Intensive Group Based CIMT for Young Children

NCT ID: NCT06330831

Last Updated: 2024-03-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

35 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-05-09

Study Completion Date

2023-07-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This project aims to investigate the effectiveness of an intensive, group-based Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) program for young children ages 2-6 years with unilateral hemiparesis, or weakness on one side of the body. This project involves two studies. Study 1 investigates the effect of one dosage of a 1-month, intensive group based CIMT summer program. Study 2 investigates the effect of a repeated, consecutive episode of the intensive, group based CIMT program for children who attended the program the following summer.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Children with hemiparesis, or weakness on one side of the body, caused by neurological conditions such as cerebral palsy or brain injury often experience difficulty using their arm and hand on their affected side (unilateral function), using both arms together (bimanual coordination) and participating in meaningful activities (occupational performance). Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) has become one of the most evidence-based treatments for children with unilateral hemiplegia. Constraint Induced Movement Therapy involves constraining the non-affected arm and hand using a cast or sling to promote the use of the affected hand. Though CIMT offered on an individual basis to children in their own homes has been found to be effective, there are disadvantages to individual, signature models or caregiver delivered models of CIMT which include cost, decreased in number of children who can receive the therapy, and caregiver burden. Group based CIMT offers an alternative model of delivery for CIMT intervention that alleviates some of the challenges. The goal of this overall project was to evaluate the effectiveness of an intensive, group-based Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (CIMT) program for young children ages 20 months through 6 years of age with hemiparesis. The children attended a month-long intensive, group based CIMT program lasting 3 hours/day x 5 days/week x 4 weeks. For the first 3 weeks the children wore a cast on their non-affected arm for nearly 24 hours a day. During the last week of the program, the occupational therapists removed the cast and focused on bimanual skills (using both hands together). The children participated in testing that measured unilateral function (performance of the weaker arm such as range of motion, grasp, ability to bear weight or catch self), bimanual coordination (the ability to use both hands for functional tasks such as holding a toy, cutting food), and occupational performance (the ability to participate in meaningful daily activities- dressing, play, school-related activities). Study 1 analyzed the effects of a single dosage of the CIMT intervention (attending the program for one month). The investigators hypothesized (predicted) that following the study, the children would statistically significantly improve unimanual function, bimanual coordination, and occupational performance. Study 2 analyzed the effects of two, consecutive episodes of CIMT intervention (attending the CIMT program for 2 summers in a row). The researcher hypothesized children would display statistically significant improvements in unimanual function, bimanual coordination, and occupational performance after each episode.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy Non-Accidental Traumatic Head Injury to Child

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Study 1 is a single group pre-post study of children who received 1 episode of the intensive, group based CIMT intervention (2 data points- pre CIMT 1 and post CIMT1). Study 2 is a repeated measures design to evaluate the long-term effects of the first episode and the effects of the second episode of intensive group based CIMT (4 data points- pre CIMT1; post CIMT1 (at the end of 1 month intervention); pre CIMT 2- 11 months after post of CIMT1; post CIMT 2- 12 months post CIMT 1)
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

No masking occurred for the participants or care providers since all parents/caregivers consented to have their children participate in the intensive group based CIMT intervention. The parents/ care providers knew who the interventionists were. The principal investigator was aware of all participants' assignment to the study. The principal investigator also delivered the intervention to the 2-3-year-old group and also served as the assessor of outcomes along with trained student investigators. The principal investigator attempted to limit bias by having all students achieve an inter-rater reliability level of 90% or above (intra-class correlation coefficient ICC\>.90) on the QUEST and by not allowing the student investigators or herself to consult the pre-intervention assessment outcome scores until after post-intervention outcome assessment scoring was completed.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intensive, Group Based CIMT

The intensive, group based CIMT program lasted for 3 hours/day x 5 days/week x 4 weeks. Children wore a cast on their non-affected arm for 24 hours/day for 3 weeks. During the last week, the cast was removed to focus on bimanual skills. Occupational therapists ran and were present for every hour of the program. Both physical therapy and speech language pathology cotreated for 1 1/2 hours two times per week and either music, art, or adaptive martial arts occurred 1 hour per week. Interns and volunteers served as intervention assistants to maintain a 2:1 or 1:1 child to therapist/interventionist ratio. The same theme-based lesson plans were used for the 2-3-year-old program and the 4-6-year-old program. Each age group program offered spots for 3-6 children to attend per year except for 2020 when the programs were suspended due to COVID 19 pandemic.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Intensive, Group Based Constraint Induced Therapy (CIMT)

Intervention Type OTHER

See arm description. Children who were in study 2 received two consecutive episodes of the intensive, group based CIMT intervention (episode 1 during the first summer, episode 2 during the following summer).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Intensive, Group Based Constraint Induced Therapy (CIMT)

See arm description. Children who were in study 2 received two consecutive episodes of the intensive, group based CIMT intervention (episode 1 during the first summer, episode 2 during the following summer).

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of unilateral hemiparesis
* Between the ages of 20 mos.- 6 yrs 11 mos. 30 days
* Authorized through insurance or scholarship to attend the CIMT summer program
* Manual Ability Classification Scale or Mini-MACS level of 1-4
* Able to follow simple commands.

Exclusion Criteria

* If in child protective service custody since videographic information for QUEST and AHA assessments could not be obtained
* If receiving additional OT therapy during the intensive, group based CIMT program
* If missed more than 3 days of the group based CIMT intervention
Minimum Eligible Age

20 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

6 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ability KC

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Rockhurst University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Katie Ryan-Bloomer

Associate Professor of Occupational Therapy

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Katherine S Ryan-Bloomer

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Associate Professor of OT Rockhurst University; Occupational Therapist at Ability KC

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Thorley M, Lannin N, Cusick A, Novak I, Boyd R. Reliability of the quality of upper extremity skills test for children with cerebral palsy aged 2 to 12 years. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2012 Feb;32(1):4-21. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2011.602389. Epub 2011 Aug 15.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21838618 (View on PubMed)

Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Holmefur M, Kottorp A, Eliasson AC. The Assisting Hand Assessment: current evidence of validity, reliability, and responsiveness to change. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007 Apr;49(4):259-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.00259.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17376135 (View on PubMed)

Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, Opzoomer A, Polatajko H, Pollock N. The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther. 1990 Apr;57(2):82-7. doi: 10.1177/000841749005700207.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10104738 (View on PubMed)

McColl MA, Denis CB, Douglas KL, Gilmour J, Haveman N, Petersen M, Presswell B, Law M. A Clinically Significant Difference on the COPM: A Review. Can J Occup Ther. 2023 Mar;90(1):92-102. doi: 10.1177/00084174221142177. Epub 2023 Jan 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36650928 (View on PubMed)

James S, Ziviani J, Boyd R. A systematic review of activities of daily living measures for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014 Mar;56(3):233-44. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12226. Epub 2013 Aug 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23937056 (View on PubMed)

Regalado A, Decker B, Flaherty BM, Zimmer L, Brown I. Effectiveness of Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Children With Hemiparesis Associated With Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review. Am J Occup Ther. 2023 May 1;77(3):7703205160. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2023.050152.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 37358836 (View on PubMed)

Chiu HC, Ada L. Constraint-induced movement therapy improves upper limb activity and participation in hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2016 Jul;62(3):130-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jphys.2016.05.013. Epub 2016 Jun 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27323932 (View on PubMed)

Tinderholt Myrhaug H, Ostensjo S, Larun L, Odgaard-Jensen J, Jahnsen R. Intensive training of motor function and functional skills among young children with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2014 Dec 5;14:292. doi: 10.1186/s12887-014-0292-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25475608 (View on PubMed)

Walker C, Shierk A, Roberts H. Constraint Induced Movement Therapy in Infants and Toddlers with Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy: A Scoping Review. Occup Ther Health Care. 2022 Jan;36(1):29-45. doi: 10.1080/07380577.2021.1953206. Epub 2021 Aug 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34339315 (View on PubMed)

Wang TN, Liang KJ, Liu YC, Shieh JY, Chen HL. Effects of Intensive Versus Distributed Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy for Children With Unilateral Cerebral Palsy: A Quasi-Randomized Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2023 Feb-Mar;37(2-3):109-118. doi: 10.1177/15459683231162330. Epub 2023 Mar 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36987387 (View on PubMed)

Wu WC, Hung JW, Tseng CY, Huang YC. Group constraint-induced movement therapy for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy: a pilot study. Am J Occup Ther. 2013 Mar-Apr;67(2):201-8. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2013.004374.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23433275 (View on PubMed)

Gelkop N, Burshtein DG, Lahav A, Brezner A, Al-Oraibi S, Ferre CL, Gordon AM. Efficacy of constraint-induced movement therapy and bimanual training in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy in an educational setting. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2015 Feb;35(1):24-39. doi: 10.3109/01942638.2014.925027. Epub 2014 Jul 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24983295 (View on PubMed)

Cohen-Holzer M, Katz-Leurer M, Reinstein R, Rotem H, Meyer S. The effect of combining daily restraint with bimanual intensive therapy in children with hemiparetic cerebral palsy: a self-control study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011;29(1):29-36. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2011-0674.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21876293 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

x2ghr8pc

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.