Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
80 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2025-10-31
2025-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Accuracy, Feasibility and Acceptance of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Critically Ill Patients
NCT02296372
Evaluation of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Patients With ACS and Type 2 Diabetes in ICU
NCT04822740
A Comparative Study to Evaluate the Accuracy and Safety of the GlySure Continuous Intravascular Glucose Monitoring System Versus Intermittent Blood Glucose Monitoring
NCT01942902
Optimization of Glycemic Control in the Hospital and Critical Care Setting
NCT04015388
Admission Glucose ICU Study
NCT00569322
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The Standards of Care in Diabetes: 2023 reported that "preliminary data suggests that CGM can significantly improve glycemic management and other hospital outcomes." Additionally, a systematic review of 32 studies evaluated the accuracy of CGM in the intensive care unit, with a consensus of moderate to good accuracy. CGM in the hospital setting could provide a valuable tool in reducing hypoglycemia, hyperglycemia, and increasing time spent in normoglycemia. Other potential benefits of CGM include a broader view of glucose patterns, capture of asymptomatic hypoglycemia, reduced length of stay, and decreased cost. The Diabetes Technology Society organized the Hospital Consensus Guideline Panel in 2020, with the final report including the recommendation for additional research on the accuracy, data management, and patient-centered outcomes of CGM use in the inpatient setting.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Open-heart surgery inpatients
Patients having elective open-heart surgery including coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), aortic valve repair/replacement (AVR), mitral valve repair/replacement (MVR), or any combination of those will have a CGM monitor placed within one hour of admission for up to 7 days or upon discharge.
CGM monitor
blood glucose sensor used to monitor interstitial glucose
General medical inpatients
Medical inpatients who have a Glucommander order for management of hyperglycemia will have a CGM monitor placed within 24 hours of admission for up to 7 days or upon discharge.
CGM monitor
blood glucose sensor used to monitor interstitial glucose
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CGM monitor
blood glucose sensor used to monitor interstitial glucose
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Glucose management per Glucommander and/or receiving POC blood glucose testing
* Patients admitted to Medical 6 or elective or urgent open-heart surgery patients admitted to the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit (CVICU)
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant or currently breastfeeding
* Prisoners
* Patients unable to consent in English.
* Patients with a preexisting insulin pump on admission
* Active skin infection at the insertion site(s)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Parkview Health
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Danielle Payne, FNP
Clinical Nurse Researcher & Nursing Research Program Coordinator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jan R Powers
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Parkview Health
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Galindo RJ, Umpierrez GE, Rushakoff RJ, Basu A, Lohnes S, Nichols JH, Spanakis EK, Espinoza J, Palermo NE, Awadjie DG, Bak L, Buckingham B, Cook CB, Freckmann G, Heinemann L, Hovorka R, Mathioudakis N, Newman T, O'Neal DN, Rickert M, Sacks DB, Seley JJ, Wallia A, Shang T, Zhang JY, Han J, Klonoff DC. Continuous Glucose Monitors and Automated Insulin Dosing Systems in the Hospital Consensus Guideline. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2020 Nov;14(6):1035-1064. doi: 10.1177/1932296820954163. Epub 2020 Sep 28.
van Steen SC, Rijkenberg S, Limpens J, van der Voort PH, Hermanides J, DeVries JH. The Clinical Benefits and Accuracy of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems in Critically Ill Patients-A Systematic Scoping Review. Sensors (Basel). 2017 Jan 14;17(1):146. doi: 10.3390/s17010146.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NUR23-1005 INPTCGM1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.