Computer Decision Support to Achieve Glycemic Control in the ICU
NCT ID: NCT00589589
Last Updated: 2015-09-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2008-01-31
2011-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The EndoToolâ„¢ computer decision support system will achieve glycemic control (defined as 80-110 mg/dL) in a shorter time, reduce glycemic excursion outside of target range, and reduce incidence of hypoglycemia (blood glucose less than 50 mg/dL) in the critically ill burn patient compared to the standard of care USAISR insulin titration protocol (Appendix A).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Improving Blood Glucose Control With a Computerized Decision Support Tool: Phase 1
NCT00655460
Optimization of Glycemic Control in the Hospital and Critical Care Setting
NCT04015388
CGM Utilization With IV Insulin EndoTool and Subcutaneous Insulin in the Neuro ICU
NCT05857007
Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Inpatients
NCT06329297
Improving Blood Glucose Control With a Computerized Decision Support Tool: Phase 2
NCT00654797
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Upon admission to the burn ICU, patients expected to require continuous insulin infusion for a minimum of 7 days will be placed on EndoToolâ„¢ CDSS for the first 24 hours of glycemic management. At the 24 hour mark the patients will be randomly assigned to either the CDSS or standard of care group in pairs. Thus, the first subject will be randomized to a group and the second subject will be placed in the alternate group. This method will ensure equal numbers of patients are enrolled in each group to eliminate bias of timing of intervention due to the effect of increasing insulin resistance over time demonstrated in the burn population (Pidcoke, unpublished, USAISR).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A
Endo Tool
Computer tool to help achieve glucose control
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endo Tool
Computer tool to help achieve glucose control
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* military or civilian burns on continuous insulin infusion for 7 days
Exclusion Criteria
* less than 18 years old
* enrolled in the Continuous Glucose monitoring Study
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
United States Army Institute of Surgical Research
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Elizabeth Mann
Administrator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elizabeth A Mann, RN, MSN
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
United States Army Institute of Surgical Research
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
US Army Institute of Surgical Research
Fort Sam Houston, Texas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Van den Berghe G, Wouters PJ, Bouillon R, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Schetz M, Vlasselaers D, Ferdinande P, Lauwers P. Outcome benefit of intensive insulin therapy in the critically ill: Insulin dose versus glycemic control. Crit Care Med. 2003 Feb;31(2):359-66. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000045568.12881.10.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
H-07-040
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.