Comparative Effectiveness Study of Constant-Load Versus Graded Aerobic Exercise in Obese Children With Bronchial Asthma
NCT ID: NCT06326632
Last Updated: 2024-03-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
78 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-10-30
2023-12-07
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
A total of 78 children with BA were randomly assigned to the CL-AE group (n = 26, who underwent moderate-intensity aerobic training with the training load maintained at the same level throughout the entire program, besides the respiratory re-training program), the G-AE group (n = 26, received an intensity- and duration-graded aerobic training in addition to the respiratory re-training program), or the control group (n = 29, who only engaged in a respiratory re-training program). Interventions were administered three times/week for 12 successive weeks.
The cardiopulmonary fitness and functional capacity were evaluated in the three groups before and after the completion of the assigned interventions.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison Between Continuous Versus Interval Exercise Training in Asthmatic Patients
NCT02489383
Effects of a Pedometer-based Unsupervised Exercise Program Upon Lifestyle Physical Activity of Asthmatic Adults
NCT01984281
Aerobic Training Versus Behavioral Intervention to Increase Physical Activity in Patients With Asthma
NCT05364632
Physical Activity of Asthmatic Children
NCT03232606
Optimizing Recovery in Pediatric ALL Survivors: A Training Comparison
NCT07330141
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Outcome measures
Cardiopulmonary fitness: The peak oxygen uptake was assessed through the McMaster cycling protocol.
Functional Capacity: The 6-minute walk test was used to assess the submaximal functional capacity Perceived dyspnea and fatigue: Borg's category ratio scale (CR-10) was used to explore how much dyspnea and fatigue they perceived after the 6-minute walk test.
Interventions
The CL-AE group received a 12-week aerobic training, three times in addition to the respiratory re-training. the program included a moderate-intensity aerobic training program, with an intensity set at 65% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 45 minutes. The training intensity and duration were maintained at the same level throughout the program. The CL-AE program included a warm-up for 5 minutes and a cool-down for 5 minutes.
The G-AE group received a 12-week aerobic training, three times in addition to the respiratory re-training. The G-AE program commenced with a training intensity corresponding to 50% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 25 minutes in the first two weeks, which progressed on a two-week basis, and ended up with a training intensity corresponding to 75% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 50 minutes in the last two weeks. The G-AE program also included a warm-up for 5 minutes and a cool-down for 5 minutes.
The control group received the respiratory re-training only, 30 minutes per session, three times a week for 12 consecutive weeks. The program consisted of diaphragmatic breathing exercises, breath-hold, and breathing control exercises, pursed lip breathing, respiratory muscle strengthening, postural correction exercises, and relaxation techniques.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
CL-AE group
The CL-AE group received a 12-week constant-load aerobic training besides the respiratory retraining program.
Constant-load Aerobic Exercise
The CL-AE group received a 12-week aerobic training, three times in addition to the respiratory re-training. the program included a moderate-intensity aerobic training program, with an intensity set at 65% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 45 minutes. The training intensity and duration were maintained at the same level throughout the program. The CL-AE program included a warm-up for 5 minutes and a cool-down for 5 minutes
G-AE group
The G-AE group received a 12-week intensity- and duration-graded aerobic training in addition to the respiratory re-training.
Graded Aerobic exercise
The G-AE group received a 12-week intensity- and duration-graded aerobic training, three times in addition to the respiratory re-training. The G-AE program commenced with a training intensity corresponding to 50% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 25 minutes in the first two weeks, which progressed on a two-week basis, and ended up with a training intensity corresponding to 75% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 50 minutes in the last two weeks. The G-AE program also included a warm-up for 5 minutes and a cool-down for 5 minutes.
Control group
The control group received the respiratory re-training only for 12 consecutive weeks.
Respiratory Re-training
The respiratory re-training lasted for 30 minutes per session and was repeated three times a week for 12 consecutive weeks. The program consisted of diaphragmatic breathing exercises, breath-hold, and breathing control exercises, pursed lip breathing, respiratory muscle strengthening, postural correction exercises, and relaxation techniques.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Constant-load Aerobic Exercise
The CL-AE group received a 12-week aerobic training, three times in addition to the respiratory re-training. the program included a moderate-intensity aerobic training program, with an intensity set at 65% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 45 minutes. The training intensity and duration were maintained at the same level throughout the program. The CL-AE program included a warm-up for 5 minutes and a cool-down for 5 minutes
Graded Aerobic exercise
The G-AE group received a 12-week intensity- and duration-graded aerobic training, three times in addition to the respiratory re-training. The G-AE program commenced with a training intensity corresponding to 50% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 25 minutes in the first two weeks, which progressed on a two-week basis, and ended up with a training intensity corresponding to 75% of the maximum age-predicted heart rate for 50 minutes in the last two weeks. The G-AE program also included a warm-up for 5 minutes and a cool-down for 5 minutes.
Respiratory Re-training
The respiratory re-training lasted for 30 minutes per session and was repeated three times a week for 12 consecutive weeks. The program consisted of diaphragmatic breathing exercises, breath-hold, and breathing control exercises, pursed lip breathing, respiratory muscle strengthening, postural correction exercises, and relaxation techniques.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Body mass index ranging from 30 to 35 kg/m2
* Verified asthma diagnosis per the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) criteria
* Moderate Onset
* Clinically Stable
* Maintained medication dosages in the past three months
* Free of lower limb or spinal deformities
* Not engaging in regular exercise regimens in the past six months.
Exclusion Criteria
* Chronic lung comorbidities
* Cardiovascular or musculoskeletal conditions expected to hinder the training.
8 Years
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Cairo University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Ragab Kamal Elnaggar
Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Ragab K. Elnaggar, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ragab K. Elnaggar
Al Kharj, Riyadh Region, Saudi Arabia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RHPT/0022/023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.