The Effect of the Helper Skin Tap Technique and Buzzy® During Vaccination
NCT ID: NCT06312228
Last Updated: 2024-03-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
96 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-05-01
2023-10-02
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Cold Application and Vibration in Reducing Pain During Vaccination in Children
NCT06566378
White Noise and Buzzy for Reducing Pain During Infant Vaccination
NCT07286721
Effectiveness of Vibratory Versus Cold Stimuli on Pain Perception in Children
NCT06841601
The Effect of Mechanical Vibration and Helfer Skin Tap Technique on Procedural Pain in Infants During Vaccination
NCT06454812
Efficacy of Animation, Buzzy, and Multiple Interventions on Pain in Children
NCT05374902
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Materials and Methods Setting The sample of the study consisted of 96 children (buzzy: 32, helfer skin tap: 32, control: 32) who underwent MMR vaccination at Bakırköy Family Health Centre No. 9 between May 2023 and October 2023.
Sample The population of the study, which was planned as a randomised controlled experimental study, consisted of 4-year-old children who applied to Bakırköy Family Health Centre (FHC) No. 9 for MMR vaccination. According to the power analysis for the sample size in line with the literature (Mahato and Thakur 2019; Şıktaş and Uysal 2023), the power of the sample was calculated with the G\*Power 3.1 programme. With a Type I error of 0.05 and a test power of 0.80 (α= 0.05, 1-β= 0.80), the minimum sample size (30 children in each group) was calculated as 90 children. Considering the losses that may occur from the sample for any reason during the study period, the study was completed with 96 children, including 32 children in the study and control groups.
Data Collection In the study, children who came to the Family Health Centre for MMR vaccination were first evaluated in terms of sampling criteria, and infants who did not meet the criteria were excluded from the study. The nurses who collected and administered the data are different. According to the childhood vaccination calendar of the Ministry of Health, MMR, quadrivalent mixed vaccine (DaBT-IPA (diphtheria, acellular pertussis, tetanus, inactive polio) are administered at the age of 4 years. The infants included in the study were first given MMR vaccine in the left arm and the other vaccine was given in the leg 10 minutes after the end of the administration.
Application MMR vaccine was administered according to the vaccine administration technique in the Ministry of Health's Expanded Immunisation Programme (2009) Circular. Vaccines are stored in the refrigerator under cold chain conditions between +2 0C - +8 0C. Before vaccine injection, it was ensured that the vaccination room was well lit and warm, and children were in a comfortable environment. The children in the Helfer Skin Tap Technique, buzzy and control group, who met the sampling criteria, were first examined by the family physician, and the parents of the children who did not have any objection to vaccination were informed about the research and their verbal and written consent was obtained and then the data collection form was filled out. Before the vaccine injection, body weight, height and physiological parameters (pulse, blood pressure, SpO2, body temperature) were measured and behavioural pain responses were evaluated by the child, nurse and parent using the Wong-Baker pain scale and fear scale. The child was first seated on the parent's lap (on the knee) and the holding position was adjusted. The child's legs were placed between the parent's legs and the arms were wrapped around the parent to hold the child. After the vaccine injection, pain and fear responses were evaluated by the nurse and parent using the Wong-Baker pain scale and fear scale. In addition, physiological parameters of the children were also measured and recorded.
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Statistical analyses were performed using R vers. 2.15.3 program Minimum, maximum, mean, standard deviation, median, first quartile, third quartile, frequency, and percentage were used to report the study data. The Shapiro-Wilk test and graphical analysis were used to evaluate the compliance of quantitative data with normal distribution. A dependent groups t-test was used to compare the values before and after the intervention. An independent groups t-test was used to evaluate normally distributed variables between two groups. One-way analysis of variance was used in the evaluations of variables with normal distribution between more than two groups. The Mann-Whitney U test evaluated variables that did not show normal distribution between the two groups. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used in the evaluations of variables that did not show normal distribution between more than two groups. Pearson correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between quantitative variables. The Pearson chi-square test, Fisher-Freeman-Halton exact test, and Fisher's exact test were used to compare qualitative variables. Statistical significance was accepted as p\<0.05.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Helper Skin Tap Technique Group
Before the vaccine injection, body weight, height and physiological parameters (pulse, blood pressure, SpO2, body temperature) were measured and behavioural pain responses were evaluated by the child, nurse and parent using the Wong-Baker pain scale and fear scale. Slow tapping was performed with rhythmic tapping movements on the left deltoid muscle where the vaccine will be administered to the children. When the needle was to be inserted into the deltoid muscle, the tapping was slightly increased and the needle entry was made with the same movement. After the vaccine injection was given, the needle was rapidly withdrawn from the muscle by increasing the tapping movements while the needle was withdrawn.
Helfer Skin Tap
Slow tapping was performed with rhythmic tapping movements on the left deltoid muscle where the vaccine will be administered to the children. When the needle was to be inserted into the deltoid muscle, the tapping was slightly increased and the needle entry was made with the same movement. After the vaccine injection was given, the needle was rapidly withdrawn from the muscle by increasing the tapping movements while the needle was withdrawn.
Buzzy Group
Before the vaccine injection, body weight, height and physiological parameters (pulse, blood pressure, SpO2, body temperature) were measured and behavioural pain responses were evaluated by the child, nurse and parent using the Wong-Baker pain scale and fear scale. The ice pack previously removed from the deep freezer was kept at room temperature for 10 minutes and the hole in the ice pack wing was placed on the hook behind the Buzzy®. The Buzzy® was placed on the left arm deltoid muscle and activated and kept for 30 seconds. After 30 seconds, Buzzy® was pulled up 1 centimetre (cm) and the MMR vaccine injection was administered to the area corresponding to the left deltoid muscle. After the vaccine injection, Buzzy® was pulled to the injection site and kept for another 30 seconds.
Buzzy
The ice pack previously removed from the deep freezer was kept at room temperature for 10 minutes and the hole in the ice pack wing was placed on the hook behind the Buzzy®. The Buzzy® was placed on the left arm deltoid muscle and activated and kept for 30 seconds. After 30 seconds, Buzzy® was pulled up 1 centimetre (cm) and the MMR vaccine injection was administered to the area corresponding to the left deltoid muscle. After the vaccine injection, Buzzy® was pulled to the injection site and kept for another 30 seconds.
Control Group
Before the vaccine injection, body weight, height and physiological parameters (pulse, blood pressure, SpO2, body temperature) were measured and behavioural pain responses were evaluated by the child, nurse and parent using the Wong-Baker pain scale and fear scale. MMR vaccine injection was routinely administered in the area corresponding to the left deltoid muscle without any intervention or application to the injection site.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Helfer Skin Tap
Slow tapping was performed with rhythmic tapping movements on the left deltoid muscle where the vaccine will be administered to the children. When the needle was to be inserted into the deltoid muscle, the tapping was slightly increased and the needle entry was made with the same movement. After the vaccine injection was given, the needle was rapidly withdrawn from the muscle by increasing the tapping movements while the needle was withdrawn.
Buzzy
The ice pack previously removed from the deep freezer was kept at room temperature for 10 minutes and the hole in the ice pack wing was placed on the hook behind the Buzzy®. The Buzzy® was placed on the left arm deltoid muscle and activated and kept for 30 seconds. After 30 seconds, Buzzy® was pulled up 1 centimetre (cm) and the MMR vaccine injection was administered to the area corresponding to the left deltoid muscle. After the vaccine injection, Buzzy® was pulled to the injection site and kept for another 30 seconds.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The administration of the DTP vaccine,
* Being at an appropriate weight for their age,
* The child not having received any analgesic medication during the day,
* The willingness of the parent to participate in the research
Exclusion Criteria
* Having a chronic illness,
* Having an allergy (egg allergy),
* Having a body temperature above 37.5 degrees Celsius
4 Years
4 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Tarsus University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Duygu Sonmez Duzkaya
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tarsus University
Mersin, , Turkey (Türkiye)
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Ayinde O, Hayward RS, Ross JDC. The effect of intramuscular injection technique on injection associated pain; a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021 May 3;16(5):e0250883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250883. eCollection 2021.
Therese, A. M., & Devi, S. (2014). Effectiveness of Helfer skin tap technique and routine technique on pain reduction among patients receiving intramuscular injection at Government General Hospital, Puducherry. Int J Sci Res, 3(10).
Jose, R. M., Sulochana, B., & Shetty, S. (2012). Effectiveness of Skin Tap Technique in Reducing Pain Response. International Journal of Nursing Education, 4(1).
Mahato, E. (2019). Effectiveness of Helfer's Skin Tap Technique Versus Routine Technique on Pain Reduction among Patient's Receiving Intramuscular Injections. International Journal of Nursing Education, 11(1),41-44.
Taddio A, McMurtry CM, Shah V, Riddell RP, Chambers CT, Noel M, MacDonald NE, Rogers J, Bucci LM, Mousmanis P, Lang E, Halperin SA, Bowles S, Halpert C, Ipp M, Asmundson GJG, Rieder MJ, Robson K, Uleryk E, Antony MM, Dubey V, Hanrahan A, Lockett D, Scott J, Bleeker EV; HELPinKids&Adults. Reducing pain during vaccine injections: clinical practice guideline. CMAJ. 2015 Sep 22;187(13):975-982. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.150391. Epub 2015 Aug 24. No abstract available.
Shah V, Taddio A, McMurtry CM, Halperin SA, Noel M, Pillai Riddell R, Chambers CT; HELPinKIDS Team. Pharmacological and Combined Interventions to Reduce Vaccine Injection Pain in Children and Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Clin J Pain. 2015 Oct;31(10 Suppl):S38-63. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000281.
Noel M, Chambers CT, McGrath PJ, Klein RM, Stewart SH. The influence of children's pain memories on subsequent pain experience. Pain. 2012 Aug;153(8):1563-1572. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.02.020. Epub 2012 May 3.
Koc T, Gozen D. The Effect of Foot Reflexology on Acute Pain in Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2015 Oct;12(5):289-96. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12099. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023/05
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.