Brain Effect Mechanism of Spinal Manipulative Therapy on LDH Analgesia Based on Multimodal MRI
NCT ID: NCT06277739
Last Updated: 2025-06-15
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
90 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-06-01
2025-05-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of the Manual Therapy on Brain Function in Young Chronic Neck Pain Patients
NCT06560437
High Intensity Focused Electromagnetic Therapy on Pain and Quality of Life in Patients With Lumbar Disc Prolapse
NCT07278596
Pressure Pain Thresholds and Basal Electromyographic Activities Following Spinal Mechanical Manipulation
NCT01469533
Back Pain Response to Different Acupuncture Methods
NCT01598974
Acupuncture for Painful Temporomandibular Disorder
NCT06738667
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Group1 (Spinal Manipulation Therapy)
The participant was placed in a side-lying position facing the clinician with the more painful side facing upward. The clinician passively flexed the participant's hips and knees to induce lumbar spine flexion until they felt the spinous process of the affected lumbar vertebrae begin to move. Next, the clinician passively rotated the participant's torso opposite to the side they were lying on until they felt rotation in the vertebra above the suspected lesion. The clinician applied a rapid thrust to the shoulder (anterior to posterior force) and pelvis (posterior to anterior force) resulting in a rotation force couple on the hypomobile segment.
Spinal Manipulative Therapy
The participant was placed in a side-lying position facing the clinician with the more painful side facing upward. The clinician passively flexed the participant's hips and knees to induce lumbar spine flexion until they felt the spinous process of the affected lumbar vertebrae begin to move. Next, the clinician passively rotated the participant's torso opposite to the side they were lying on until they felt rotation in the vertebra above the suspected lesion. The clinician applied a rapid thrust to the shoulder (anterior to posterior force) and pelvis (posterior to anterior force) resulting in a rotation force couple on the hypomobile segment. If a cavitation (ie, an audible pop) occurred, the treatment was considered complete. If no cavitation was produced, the participant was repositioned and the manipulation was attempted again. A maximum of 2 attempts per side was permitted. If no cavitation was produced after the 4 attempts (ie, 2 per side), the treatment was considered complete.
Group2 Sham Laser Treatment)
The laser manufacturer (MedX Health Corp) provided a MedX 1100 system that did not deliver any significant amount of light energy or heat but otherwise appeared operational to participants and clinicians. The sham laser was delivered over the painful region with the study participant positioned as described for spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization treatments.
Sham Laser Treatment
The laser manufacturer (MedX Health Corp) provided a MedX 1100 system that did not deliver any significant amount of light energy or heat but otherwise appeared operational to participants and clinicians. The sham laser was delivered over the painful region with the study participant positioned as described for spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization treatments.
Group3 (healthy controls)
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Spinal Manipulative Therapy
The participant was placed in a side-lying position facing the clinician with the more painful side facing upward. The clinician passively flexed the participant's hips and knees to induce lumbar spine flexion until they felt the spinous process of the affected lumbar vertebrae begin to move. Next, the clinician passively rotated the participant's torso opposite to the side they were lying on until they felt rotation in the vertebra above the suspected lesion. The clinician applied a rapid thrust to the shoulder (anterior to posterior force) and pelvis (posterior to anterior force) resulting in a rotation force couple on the hypomobile segment. If a cavitation (ie, an audible pop) occurred, the treatment was considered complete. If no cavitation was produced, the participant was repositioned and the manipulation was attempted again. A maximum of 2 attempts per side was permitted. If no cavitation was produced after the 4 attempts (ie, 2 per side), the treatment was considered complete.
Sham Laser Treatment
The laser manufacturer (MedX Health Corp) provided a MedX 1100 system that did not deliver any significant amount of light energy or heat but otherwise appeared operational to participants and clinicians. The sham laser was delivered over the painful region with the study participant positioned as described for spinal manipulation and spinal mobilization treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The age range for participants is 18 to 65 years, encompassing any gender, and they must be right-handed.
* Participants should be in the non-acute phase of the condition, experiencing mild to moderate pain and functional impairment, with the duration of symptoms exceeding 2 weeks.
* Participants should have a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score greater than 4 and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores less than 15.
* Eligible participants must not have taken analgesics, neurotropic nutrition drugs, or sedatives in the past month and should not have undergone systemic treatment.
* Participants should not have received spinal manipulation or other physical therapies in the past month.
* Participants must voluntarily agree to participate in this study and have signed an informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
* Individuals with severe primary diseases impacting the cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, liver, or kidney systems.
* Those with neurogenic functional disorders, psychiatric conditions, a history of significant head trauma, or a history of unconsciousness.
* Individuals diagnosed with primary sciatica or dry sciatica.
* Those with lumbar spondylolisthesis.
* Patients suffering from lumbar tumors or tuberculosis.
* Individuals with severe osteoporosis or localized skin lesions in the lumbar area.
* Patients experiencing painful conditions beyond the lumbar region.
* Those with diseases characterized by structural changes in the brain.
* Individuals with impaired consciousness, severe visual or hearing impairments, speech disorders, or others who are unable to complete health assessments.
* Individuals with dental implants, metal stents, or other elements that may compromise MRI imaging.
* Those with a fear of MRI or other reasons that prevent undergoing MRI scans.
* Patients diagnosed with lumbar disc herniation but who are asymptomatic.
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zhou Xingchen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zhou Xingchen
Prof.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Zhi-zhen Lv, Ph.D.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
The Third School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zhou XC, Wu S, Wang KZ, Chen LH, Wei ZC, Li T, Hua ZH, Xia Q, Lyu ZZ, Lyu LJ. Impact of Spinal Manipulative Therapy on Brain Function and Pain Alleviation in Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Resting-State fMRI Study. Chin J Integr Med. 2025 Feb;31(2):108-117. doi: 10.1007/s11655-024-4205-7. Epub 2024 Dec 21.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
20220117020315695
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.