The Effect of Pharyngeal Cooling Applications on Postoperative Throat Pain and Nausea Vomiting

NCT ID: NCT06271161

Last Updated: 2024-02-21

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

84 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-01-01

Study Completion Date

2024-01-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The goal of this observational study is to to evaluate the effects of a throat pack soaked with saline at +4 ºC on postoperative throat pain (POTP) and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in dental surgical procedures performed under general anesthesia. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. How long can we keep the pharyngeal mucosa cold using tampons and cold wash solutions? 2. Does cooling the pharyngeal mucosa reduce the incidence of postoperative sore throat and nausea and vomiting?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The study included 84 ASA I - II patients, over 18 years of age, who would undergo outpatient surgery under general anesthesia in the operating room of Selçuk University Faculty of Dentistry. Apfel score was used to classify patients according to PONV risk. Patients with Apfel scores of 0, 1 and 2 were included in the study. Patients with a history of difficult intubation, patients who could not be intubated at the first attempt, patients with bleeding disorders, motion sickness, malignancy, and patients who had an upper respiratory tract infection in the last 2 weeks were excluded from the study.

The patients were not prescribed any analgesics or anxiolytics before surgery. Pulse oximetry (SpO2), electrocardiogram (ECG), non-invasive blood pressure and end-tidal CO2 pressure (PETCO2) and nasopharyngeal temperature measurement (T), which are standard monitoring methods in general anesthesia applications, were applied to all patients and the values were recorded every 5 minutes. Each patient was administered IV cannulation over the right hand and 1 mg/kg intravenous methylprednisolone and 40 mg pantoprozole were administered before surgery. Anesthesia was induced with 3 mg/kg iv sodium thiopental, 0.6 mg/kg iv rocuronium bromide and 1-1.5 mcg/kg iv fentanyl, and was maintained with 2% sevoflurane in 50% N2O/50% O2. All patients were given appropriate head and neck position before surgery, after nasal intubation with an endotracheal tube (ETT) with lubricating gel applied to the cuff, with the help of a videolaryngoscope. ETT cuff pressure was kept within the range of 20-30 cm H2O with the help of a manometer (VBM, Sultz, Germany) throughout the surgery. The patient's body temperature was monitored by placing a reusable temperature probe into the nasopharynx and recorded during the operation. A throat tampon made of 20x10 cm diameter gauze soaked in saline at +4 ºC was gently placed into the oropharynx by the anesthetist and surgical procedures were initiated.

Demographic data of the patients included in the study such as age, gender, weight, Apfel scores, total doses of opioid drugs used in anesthesia, anesthesia-related data such as ASA score, endotracheal tube diameter, and surgical procedure-related data such as surgical time, surgical procedure, and amount of bleeding were recorded.

During the surgery, the operating room temperature was kept between 22 ºC and 24 ºC. The amount of saline at +4 ºC used to wash the oral cavity during surgical procedures was recorded. At the conclusion of the surgical procedures, the neuromuscular blockade was reversed and the tampon was gently removed by the same anesthesiologist before extubation. All patients were administered IV 50 mg Dexketoprofen just before waking up from general anesthesia.

All patients in the study were extubated and taken to the recovery room. Nausea, vomiting, and sore throat were recorded at the 5th, 10th, and 30th minutes, and at the 1st, 2nd, and 6th hours postoperatively by a surgical assistant who was blinded to the study. IV 20 mg metoclorpamide was used as rescue antiemetic. For pain scores higher than POBA 4, 75 mg tramadol in 100 ml 0.9% saline was administered as a 10-minute IV infusion. Analgesic and antiemetic drug use was recorded as present or absent. All patients were discharged on the day of surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Pain Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Throat, Sore Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

OTHER

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* \> 18 year old
* ASA I-II
* Apfel Score\<2

Exclusion Criteria

* Clinical diagnosis of motion sickness
* Clinical diagnosis of malignancy
* Clinical diagnosis of upper respiratory tract infection in last 2 weeks
* Clinical diagnosis of any bleeding disorders
* Patient that couldn't be intubated at first attempt
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Selcuk University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

FUNDA ARUN

Assisstant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

FUNDA ARUN, Ass. Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Selcuk University Faculty of Dentistry

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Funda Arun

Selçuklu, Konya, Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

F002

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.