Effects of Menthol Gum Chewıng on Postoperatıve Nausea, Vomiting, and Length Of Hospital Stay in Children Undergoing Appendectomy: A Randomızed Controlled Trıal

NCT ID: NCT05679531

Last Updated: 2023-01-12

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-04-01

Study Completion Date

2022-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The study was conducted as an experimental study to determine the effect of menthol chewing gum application on postoperative nausea, vomiting and hospital stay in children with appendectomy. The population of the study consisted of children aged 7-18 who underwent appendectomy in Bursa Yüksek İhtisas Training and Research Hospital Pediatric Surgery clinic between April and June 2022. In the sample of the study, a total of 60 children (menthol gum group- intervention group=30, control=30) who had postoperative nausea-vomiting, accepted to participate in the study and met the sample selection criteria were included. Starting from the second hour after the child was brought to the clinic after appendectomy, the children in the chewing gum group with nausea and vomiting were chewed gum for an average of 15 minutes. The patients in the study group were not intervened except for routine nursing care. During the chewing gum (between 5-10. minutes), up to 30., 60. and 120. Minutes after the chewing gum.The patient was re-evaluated in terms of nausea with the BARF nausea scale. Episodes of vomiting were recorded in patients with vomiting. After the quantitative stages of the study were completed, the patient's level of relief was evaluated using a verbal descriptive scale. Nausea and vomiting were also evaluated before the patient was discharged.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting Hospitalism in Children

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control group

Children in the control group, who met the research criteria, were not applied any procedure other than clinical routine protocol and nursing care. After being brought to the pediatric surgery service, patients with nausea and vomiting were filled out with a questionnaire. The severity of nausea was evaluated with the BARF Scale during nausea and vomiting and 30, 60 and 120 minutes after nausea and vomiting in patients with nausea and vomiting.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Chewing gum group

Starting from the second hour after the child was brought to the clinic after appendectomy, menthol sugar free gum was given to children with nausea and vomiting outside the clinical routine nursing care, as soon as they could chew gum and follow the instructions, and were asked to chew for an average of 15 minutes. The product of a single brand of gum was used. In the first stage, the patient's nausea was evaluated with the BARF nausea scale before the intervention. After filling out the patient information form, the patients who met the research criteria were chewed gum for an average of 15 minutes. During the intervention (between 5-10 minutes), the patient was re-evaluated for nausea with the BARF nausea scale at 30.,60. and 120 minutes after the intervention. Episodes of vomiting were recorded in patients with vomiting.After the quantitative stages of the study were completed, the patient's level of relief was evaluated using a verbal descriptive scale.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

intervention

Intervention Type OTHER

After filling out the patient information form, the patients who met the research criteria were chewed gum for an average of 15 minutes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

intervention

After filling out the patient information form, the patients who met the research criteria were chewed gum for an average of 15 minutes.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Child and parent's willingness to participate in the research
* The child has no intellectual disability or perception problems.
* Patients who underwent general anesthesia
* Patients who do not develop postoperative complications
* Patients in the 7-18 age group
* Patients who can tolerate chewing gum in the postoperative period
* Patients who like to chew gum
* Patients with nausea and vomiting

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with a diagnosis of diabetes
* Patients with teeth and jaw problems
* Patients with menthol allergy
* Patients with irritable bowel syndrome
* Patients with a history of reflux
* Patients whose cognitive level is not suitable
* Patients with a nasogastric tube
Minimum Eligible Age

7 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Ruya Naz

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ruya Naz

Nurse

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Bursa Uludag University

Bursa, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RNaz

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.