Prospective Validation of the SHOCKMATRIX Hemorrhage Predictive Model
NCT ID: NCT06270615
Last Updated: 2025-02-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
1584 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-07-01
2024-06-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
PREhospital Prediction of the Risk of Intracranial Hemorrhagic Injury in the Elderly Patient with a Fall
NCT06784284
Comparison of Two Initial Evaluation Scales of the Severity of Brain Injury Adults Patients on the Neurological Outcome at 6 Months
NCT03157453
Comparison of Ultrasound Cerebral Perfusion Imaging With Routine Perfusion CT
NCT07324421
Noncontrast CT-Based Deep Learning for Predicting Hematoma Expansion Risk in Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage
NCT06602115
Blood Pressure Target in Acute Stroke to Reduce hemorrhaGe After Endovascular Therapy
NCT03160677
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: Part of the TRAUMATRIX project led by the Traumabase Group in partnership with Capgemini Invent and several research centers (Ecole polytechnique, CNRS, EHESS), this study aims to externally validate a recently developed machine learning-based predictive model for ESH in trauma patients. This model, previously trained on a high-quality trauma database named Traumabase, offers a specific ability to handle missing values.
Materials and Methods: At least 1500 adult trauma patients from 8 French trauma centers will be included for a six-24 month period with a retrospective and prospective sample. ESH will stand as our primary outcome, defined as any of the following events occurring within the first hours of trauma management: any packed red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in the resuscitation room, or transfusion exceeding 4 RBCs within the first 6 hours, or emergency hemostatic intervention (surgery or interventional radiology), or death in an unambiguous setting of uncontrolled, objectified hemorrhage. Data of interest will be collected in two phases: (1) from the prehospital phase of the trauma management, where the variables needed to calculate the algorithmic prediction of ESH (10 inputs) as well as the clinical prediction from the attending trauma leader receiving in the resuscitation room a pre-alert call from the dispatch center, will be recorded in real-time using a dedicated user-friendly smartphone interface developed by the Capgemini Invent teams; (2) from a delayed phase where a classic inclusion in the Traumabase® will be performed to retrieve the component variables of the ESH composite endpoint, and a feedback survey will be sent to the trauma teams involved in the study to collect additional informative data. The prospective data collected, we will compare to a retrospective cohort predictive performance of two systems, namely the clinical trauma expert versus our machine learning-based predictive model.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
OTHER
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Prehospital severe trauma patients
Every severe trauma patient 18 years of age or older to be admitted to a participating center excluding those already diagnosed with active hemorrhage from computed tomography findings and those with prior traumatic cardiac arrest
Ambispective validation of machine learning-based predictive model
Retrospective and prospective validation of a machine learning model to predict major haemorrhage in trauma patients compared to clinician prediction
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ambispective validation of machine learning-based predictive model
Retrospective and prospective validation of a machine learning model to predict major haemorrhage in trauma patients compared to clinician prediction
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* patients with prior traumatic cardiac arrest
* patient under 18 years of age
* opposition of patient or relative
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Traumabase Group
UNKNOWN
Capgemini Invent
UNKNOWN
Ecole polytechnique
UNKNOWN
EHESS (Ecole des hautes études en sciences sociales)
UNKNOWN
CNRS (Centre national de la recherche scientifique)
UNKNOWN
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Beaujon Hospital AP-HP, Anesthesia-Intensive Care Department
Clichy, , France
Grenoble Alpes University Hospital
La Tronche, , France
Bicêtre Hospital AP-HP, Anesthesia-Intensive Care Department
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, , France
Lille University Hospital, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit
Lille, , France
Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital AP-HP, Anesthesia-Intensive Care Department
Paris, , France
Georges-Pompidou European Hospital AP-HP, Anesthesia-Intensive Care Department
Paris, , France
University Hospitals Strasbourg, Anaesthesia, Intensive Care and Peri-Operative Medicine Department
Strasbourg, , France
University Hospital of Toulouse, Polyvalent Intensive Care
Toulouse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CRCBDD1712
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.