Comparative Clinical Study to Evaluate the Possible Efficacy and Safety of Oral N-Acetyl Cysteine Versus Rectal Diclofenac in the Prevention of Post Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis

NCT ID: NCT06252441

Last Updated: 2024-02-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-02-29

Study Completion Date

2025-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the current study is to compare the efficacy and safety of oral NAC and rectal diclofenac in preventing Post Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Pancreatitis. .

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) , a key tool that is used in diagnosis and treatment of pancreato-biliary diseases. Post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP) is the most common and serious complication that can occur following this procedure and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. A variety of patient-related and procedure-related factors have been associated with higher rates of PEP.

Two definitions were used for diagnosis of PEP. In both definitions, PEP is diagnosed if two of the three criteria are found in the patient .The consensus criteria that was developed by Cotton and Colleagues in 1991 defined PEP as the presence of a new pancreatic-type abdominal pain associated with at least a threefold elevation in pancreatic enzyme concentration occurring 24 hours following the ERCP procedure, with the necessity for a new or extended hospitalization for at least two nights. Severity of pancreatitis is defined based on the number of hospitalized days following ERCP as mild (\< 4 days), moderate (4 to 10 days), or severe (\>10 days). The revised Atlanta Classification in 2012 lists abdominal pain consistent with acute pancreatitis, amylase or lipase elevation to more than 3 times the upper limit of normal, and abdominal imaging that reveals pancreatic inflammation.

Several potential triggers can contribute to PEP. Mechanical trauma caused by ERCP instrumentation can harm the papilla and pancreatic duct, affecting pancreatic drainage. Thermal injury can occur during biliary or pancreatic sphincterotomy electrosurgical current. Chemical damage can occur when contrast medium is introduced into the pancreatic duct. Hydrostatic damage can occur when injecting contrast media into the pancreatic duct or infusing fluids such as water or saline solution during sphincter manometry. Regardless of the cause, the initial injury sets in motion a chain of events that include premature activation of proteolytic enzymes, autodigestion of pancreatic tissue, and impaired secretion from acinar cells. These events result in pancreatitis clinical symptoms, which have an influence both locally and systemically. Most PEP prevention techniques try to disrupt one or more steps in this cascade.

While the precise mechanism of PEP remains unknown, it is most likely induced by a proinflammatory cascade initiated by pancreatic acinar cell damage, which results in systemic cytokine release. Cytokines play a major role in the pathogenesis of acute pancreatitis as part of the underlying systemic inflammatory response, tissue damage, and organ dysfunction. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) is a pro-inflammatory cytokine that promotes the inflammatory response, whereas Interleukin-10 (IL-10) is an immunosuppressive cytokine that inhibits inflammation. These markers can be used in measurement of the degree of systemic inflammation as predictors of the development of PEP.

Phospholipase A2 is essential in this signaling cascade. Diclofenac is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that effectively inhibits phospholipase A2 activity. According to this notion, anti-inflammatory drugs such as diclofenac can stop or attenuate the first cascade that leads to clinical PEP.

Previous meta-analyses have suggested that NSAIDs are effective in preventing PEP. The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guidelines recommend routine rectal administration of 100 mg of diclofenac or indomethacin immediately before ERCP procedure in all patients without contraindications to NSAIDs administration. Rectal administration route of diclofenac is the most effective in the prevention of PEP. Rectal diclofenac is a cheap, widely available agent with easy administration method and favorable side effect profile.

Oxidative stress and active oxygen species can activate inflammatory cascade and immune responses. N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), an antioxidant drug with anti-inflammatory properties can inhibit oxidative stress as well as inflammatory intermediates, suggesting that it could aid in the prevention of PEP. Despite the failure of intravenous N-acetyl cysteine studies, 2013 pilot research revealed that oral NAC may be useful in reducing PEP. This would be due to the different pharmacokinetics of NAC followed in different studies. In a multicenter global randomized controlled trial investigation, It is reported that oral NAC is more effective than indomethacin in the prevention of PEP.

Although both oral NAC and rectal diclofenac are widely used pharmacological agents, till now no study has evaluated their comparative safety and efficacy in preventing PEP. Hence this study is planned to evaluate and compare their efficacy and safety in preventing PEP.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Post ERCP Pancreatitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Rectal Diclofenac

This Group will include 23 patients who will receive 100 mg rectal diclofenac before ERCP.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rectal Diclofenac

Intervention Type DRUG

100 mg Rectal Diclofenac Before ERCP

Oral N-acetyl cysteine

This Group will include 23 patients who will receive 1200 mg N-acetyl cysteine in 150 cc water orally before ERCP.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Oral N-acetyl cysteine

Intervention Type DRUG

1200 mg N-acetyl cysteine in 150 cc water orally before ERCP.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Rectal Diclofenac

100 mg Rectal Diclofenac Before ERCP

Intervention Type DRUG

Oral N-acetyl cysteine

1200 mg N-acetyl cysteine in 150 cc water orally before ERCP.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age more than 18 years old.
2. Gender: males and females.
3. Patients with suitable indications for ERCP due to suspected pancreato-biliary disorders.
4. Blood amylase and lipase levels before ERCP are within the normal limits.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age of less than 18 years old.
2. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM).
3. Severe bleeding tendency.
4. Impaired renal function (serum creatinine \> 2 mg/dL), (creatinine clearance \<30 ml/min).
5. Patients with severe heart disease.
6. Subjects who underwent prior biliary or pancreatic sphincterotomy or dilatation or stenting of either duct.
7. Currently pregnant or nursing.
8. Admission due to established pancreatitis before ECRP.
9. Unwillingness to undergo ERCP.
10. Previously documented allergy to NAC or diclofenac or any other NSAIDs.
11. History of NSAIDs intake one week before the procedure.
12. Recent Active bleeding, ulcer, or asthma.
13. Patients with rectal disease (hemorrhoids, fissures, abscesses, and incontinence).
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Tanta University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Mariam Tarek Mohammed Tabana

Teaching Assistant , Faculty of Pharmacy, Menoufia University

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Obstructive Jaundice Clinic in the National Liver Institute, Menoufia University , Shebin Elkoom

Menofia, , Egypt

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Mariam Tabana

Role: CONTACT

01095153770

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Post ERCP Pancreatitis

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

N Acetyl Cysteine for Cystinosis Patients
NCT01614431 COMPLETED PHASE4