Acetylcysteine, Theophylline, and a Combination of Both in the Prophylaxis of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy

NCT ID: NCT00492518

Last Updated: 2007-06-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

254 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2002-02-28

Study Completion Date

2004-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Several studies demonstrated a significant reduction of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN; definition: increase in serum creatinine of \>=0.5mg/dl and/or \>=25% increase within 48h after contrast-medium) by acetylcysteine (A) or theophylline (T). However, the results are contradictory. Therefore, it was the aim of our double-blind study to compare the effects of A, T, a combination of A and T (A+T), and placebo (P).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is the third leading cause of hospital-acquired acute renal failure (ARF). Accounting for 12% of ARF cases, CIN is defined as an increase of serum creatinine of at least 0.5 mg/d ("Barrett“s definition") and/or 25% within 48 hours of contrast-medium application. CIN is associated with prolonged hospitalisation and increased mortality. CIN frequency depends on several risk-factors including pre-existing renal dysfunction, high amounts of contrast-medium, diabetes, and concurrent use of nephrotoxic drugs. CIN incidence is low in the absence of risk-factors; however, in high-risk patients, CIN occurs in more than 50% of patients.

A variety of prophylactic approaches have been investigated. Despite nephro-protective effects of hydration with saline or with sodium bicarbonate, other trials reported CIN-incidences between 20 and 50% despite hydration. Several studies and two recent meta-analyses demonstrated a significant reduction of renal impairment after contrast-medium using medical prophylaxis with the adenosine antagonist theophylline. However, a recent trial failed to prove prophylactic effects of theophylline.

The antioxidant acetylcysteine (ACC) was effective in patients with impaired renal function in at least six studies, but it was not preventive in at least 21 trials and two recent meta-analyses. A recent study comparing the prophylactic efficacy of theophylline and acetylcysteine demonstrated superior prophylactic effects of theophylline. Nevertheless, this study did not include a placebo group, was not restricted to patients with impaired renal function and exclusively enrolled ICU-patients.

Therefore, we performed a double-blinded study to compare the effects of acetylcysteine, theophylline, a combination of both, and placebo in patients with impaired renal function (serum creatinine \>=1.3mg/dl) parenterally receiving \>=100ml of contrast-medium.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Contrast Induced Nephropathy Kidney Diseases Renal Failure Adverse Effects

Keywords

Explore important study keywords that can help with search, categorization, and topic discovery.

Contrast Induced Nephropathy Prophylaxis Theophylline Acetylcysteine Coronary angiography

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Acetylcysteine

Intervention Type DRUG

Theophylline

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Impaired renal function (serum creatinine \>=1.3mg/dl)
* \>=100ml of contrast-medium
* Age \>= 18years
* Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Previous dialysis and/or haemofiltration
* Pre-treatment with acetylcysteine and/or theophylline within the last 2 days,
* Pregnancy
* Contraindications to theophylline (untreated high grade arrhythmia or a history of seizures) or acetylcysteine (known allergy).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Technical University of Munich

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Wolfgang Huber, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Technical University of Munich

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Klinikum Rechts der Isar; Technical University of Munich

Munich, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ACC-Theo-1.3

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id