Postoperative Analgesic Effect of Infraspinatus-teres Minor Inter-fascial Block in Patients Undergoing Shoulder Surgery
NCT ID: NCT06240884
Last Updated: 2024-07-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
74 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-12-08
2024-04-12
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Interscalene vs Infraspinatus-teres Minor (ITM) Interfascial Block in Shoulder Surgery
NCT06844630
Ultrasound-Guided Extrafascial Versus Intrafascial Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block in Shoulder Arthroscopy
NCT05222334
Nerve Stimulator Versus Ultrasound-guided Interscalene Block for Shoulder Surgery
NCT02342873
Supraclavicular Versus Interscalene Block
NCT02014766
Ultrasound-guided PENG Block for Shoulder Surgery
NCT05072223
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Infraspinatus-teres minor (ITM), first proposed by Shin Hyung Kim, is a single-site injection in the interfascial plane between Infraspinatus and teres minor. Once the IS and Tm on the humeral head area are identified, by moving the probe mediocaudally, the interfascial structure of the IS and Tm can be traced along the glenohumeral joint, scapular neck area. On autopsy, local anesthetics were found to have spread to the suprascapular and axillary nerves. This result suggests that interfascia block injection of local anesthetics between the infraspinatus and teres minor muscles may help relieve pain in the upper shoulder, back, and external sensory areas. At present, there are few clinical reports on the use of infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block for postoperative analgesia of shoulder joint, and the postoperative analgesia effect is only reported in individual cases, without comparison with other nerve blocks There are few studies on the clinical application of ITM block, but ISB has become the best method for postoperative analgesia of shoulder joint surgery. the investigators designed a prospective, randomized controlled, non-inferior study to investigate the efficacy of ultrasound-guided subaspina-teres minor interfascial block in analgesia and overall quality of recovery after shoulder joint surgery.
The primary outcome indicator was the area under the NRS curve at rest in the 0-24h postoperative period
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block
Patients will receive Infraspinatus-teres Minor Interfascial Block with 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine prior to induction of general anesthesia.
Infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block
After identifying the infraspinatus and teres minor muscles on the posterior surface of the scapular neck. Under real-time ultrasound guidance, the needle is advanced into the interfascial plane between the infraspinatus and teres minor muscles using an in-plane technique, and after confirming the fascial opening with 3 to 5 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine (20 mL total dose), the remaining 0.375% ropivacaine is injected. After extubation and the patients were awake, anesthesiologists who were unaware of the study subgroups began to assess the analgesic effect of the patients' block at rest using the numeric pain rating scale (NRS) at 0.5h, 3h, 6h, 12h, 18h, 24h, and 48h postoperatively.
interscalene block
The patient underwent an ultrasound-guided brachial plexus nerve block in the interosseous sulcus using 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine.
interscalene block
The tip of the needle was placed between the C5 and C6 nerve roots, and after a bloodless retraction with 0.5 to 1 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine to confirm nerve displacement, the remaining 0.375% ropivacaine was injected (total dose of 20 ml). Subsequently, the catheter was inserted over the needle and the needle was withdrawn.After extubation and the patients were awake, anesthesiologists who were unaware of the study subgroups began to assess the analgesic effect of the patients' block at rest using the numeric pain rating scale (NRS) at 0.5h, 3h, 6h, 12h, 18h, 24h, and 48h postoperatively.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Infraspinatus-teres minor interfascial block
After identifying the infraspinatus and teres minor muscles on the posterior surface of the scapular neck. Under real-time ultrasound guidance, the needle is advanced into the interfascial plane between the infraspinatus and teres minor muscles using an in-plane technique, and after confirming the fascial opening with 3 to 5 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine (20 mL total dose), the remaining 0.375% ropivacaine is injected. After extubation and the patients were awake, anesthesiologists who were unaware of the study subgroups began to assess the analgesic effect of the patients' block at rest using the numeric pain rating scale (NRS) at 0.5h, 3h, 6h, 12h, 18h, 24h, and 48h postoperatively.
interscalene block
The tip of the needle was placed between the C5 and C6 nerve roots, and after a bloodless retraction with 0.5 to 1 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine to confirm nerve displacement, the remaining 0.375% ropivacaine was injected (total dose of 20 ml). Subsequently, the catheter was inserted over the needle and the needle was withdrawn.After extubation and the patients were awake, anesthesiologists who were unaware of the study subgroups began to assess the analgesic effect of the patients' block at rest using the numeric pain rating scale (NRS) at 0.5h, 3h, 6h, 12h, 18h, 24h, and 48h postoperatively.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Age 18-80 years old;
3. ASA Grade I-III;
4. The duration of surgery is expected to be 1-3h
Exclusion Criteria
2. accompanied by abnormal sensory or motor function of the upper limb;
3. Active infection at the puncture site, or coagulation dysfunction (hemophilia, von willeophilia, or International normalized ratio \[INR\]\>2);
4. Patients with severe respiratory diseases and a serious history of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases;
5. ipsilateral shoulder joint surgery history;
6. Patients with nerve block failure;
7. Allergic to local anesthetics;
8. Long-term use of opioids (duration ≥3 months or duration ≥1 month and daily dose ≥5mg morphine equivalent);
9. Operation time \<1h or \>3h
10. Patients and their families refused surgical anesthesia and were unable to complete the questionnaire.
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Qing-he Zhou
professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
QINGhe ZHOU
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
deputy chair of board
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University
Jiaxing, Zhejiang, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kim SH, Yeo IS, Jang J, Jung HE, Chun YM, Yang HM. Infraspinatus-teres minor (ITM) interfascial block: a novel approach for combined suprascapular and axillary nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2024 Jan 11;49(1):67-72. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-104738.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023-KY-676
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.