Comparison of Two Types of Face Mask Ventilation in Obese Patients
NCT ID: NCT06219460
Last Updated: 2024-01-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
108 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-01-01
2023-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
CPAP in Patients With Severe Obesity After Anesthesia
NCT06287632
Comparison Between Volume Controlled Ventilation and Pressure Controlled Ventilation
NCT00224653
Gastric Insufflation During Facemask Ventilation at Different Levels of End-expiratory Pressure in Obese Patients
NCT05979129
Oxygenation Procedure for Obese Patients During Intubation in the Operating Room
NCT06914401
New Position for Endotracheal Intubation of Obese Patients
NCT03732976
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The study was conducted on patients with the BMI over 39 kg/m2 Patients qualified for bariatric surgery were selected for this study according to the order of reporting to the surgery department. The study adopted a simplified assumption that the gynoid type of obesity most often concerns women, and the android type, i.e. abdominal obesity, most often affects men. Two face masks were used to compare the effectiveness of replacement ventilation: the cuffed and uncuffed . It was randomly chosen (by tossing a coin) which face mask would be used first. The induction of anesthesia was low-opioid, the patients were placed in the supine position with the head and trunk elevated by 25 degrees on a positioning pad. 100% oxygen concentration was used for active pre-oxygenation, the test mask was applied with one hand using the EC clamp technique. The masks were changed after four consecutive measurements for each type of mask. In order to objectify the measurement with the same tidal volume, a respirator was used with the same settings: Tidal Volume of 500 ml and respiratory rate of 12/min. Sealing was measured by comparing the inspired volume with expired volume, that is the amount of leakage generated by individual masks was assessed. The obtained data were analyzed with the Kolmogorow-Smirnov test and supplemented with the values of the Wilcoxona test.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cuffed face amsk
Ventilation using cuffed face mask
Ventilation using two types of face masks
ventilation using two types of face mask
Uncuffed face mask
Ventilation using uncuffed face mask
Ventilation using two types of face masks
ventilation using two types of face mask
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ventilation using two types of face masks
ventilation using two types of face mask
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia
Exclusion Criteria
* predicted difficult face-mask ventilation
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Medical University of Lodz
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Tomasz Gaszynski
prof. dr hab.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Tomasz Gaszynski, Prof
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Medical University of Lodz, Poland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Medical University of Lodz, Poland
Lodz, , Poland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RNN/96/13/KB
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.