Validation of a New Simplified Scoring System for Acute Calculous Cholecystitis

NCT ID: NCT06213740

Last Updated: 2024-01-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

387 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-01-08

Study Completion Date

2021-12-17

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) is the second most frequent surgical condition in emergency departments. The recommended treatment is surgical treatment (ST) and the accepted mortality is \<1%, but in severe and/or fragile patients is higher. Despite the Tokyo Guidelines, there no consensus on who is the unfit patient for ST. A recent study has identified 4 risk factors that predicts the mortality in a 92% of patients (ACME) and could help to develop new guidelines in ACC. The aim of this study is this validation of the new simplified scoring system for mortality in ACC.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a retrospective single-center observational study of 387 adults with ACC during 2 non-consecutive years (2017/2021), including baseline demographic characteristics, comorbidity severity defined as Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), ASA Score, Tokyo Guidelines' severity classification and the new ACME Score. The primary outcome is to study the prediction of mortality of ACME score. Secondary outcomes include complications following Clavien-Dindo's classification, C-statistic, and ROC Curves.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Acute Cholecystitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The selected patients were among those who had acute cholecystitis according to the TG18 or received a diagnosis of ACC in the histopathological report.

Exclusion Criteria

* The study case definition was a "Pure ACC", therefore, patients with any other concomitant diagnosis potentially influencing outcome such as acute pancreatitis, acalculous cholecystitis, chronic cholecystitis, acute cholangitis, postoperative cholecystitis, gallbladder adenocarcinoma and those who had undergone cholecystectomy as a prophylactic measure in another intervention were excluded from the study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hospital del Mar

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ana María González Castillo

Doctor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ana María González Castillo

Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ACME_Validation

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cmplications of ERCP
NCT04062617 COMPLETED