Observational Study to Develop a Predictive Score for Adverse Events Post ERCP

NCT ID: NCT06776874

Last Updated: 2025-01-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

981 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2021-03-24

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main objective of the study is: the identification of independent factors associated with an increased risk of post-ERCP complications. Other objectives are: the development of a predictive model of events post-ERCP adverse events and its validation; geographic validation of a predictive model already published in the literature using data collected during the study and the evaluation of the rate of post-ERCP AEs in the centers involved in the study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) was described for the first time in 1968 and today is the pivotal procedure for the treatment of various biliopancreatic diseases. ERCP is associated with adverse events (AEs) such as post-ERCP pancreatitis (PEP), cholangitis and also with mortality.AEs related to therapeutic ERCP have been variably reported in several studies, with an estimated range of 4-30% for all AEs and 0.1-1% for overall mortality. In a systematic review of 21 studies prospective studies found an overall AE rate of 6.85% with mortality of 0.33%. PEP (3-15%) and bleeding (1-5%) are the two most common AEs, followed by cholangitis (1-5%) and perforation (1-2%). Several studies have attempted to identify potential risk factors for EAs ERCP-relati. Many of these studies are limited by the heterogeneity of definitions, the use of outdated criteria for the definition of AEs and by not large samples of patients. A more precise identification of the risk factors of EA related to ERCP is important so that preventive therapies can be introduced early and more effectively monitor individuals at increased risk. A recent retrospective study by Eduardo-Rodrigues Pinto et al. conducted on 1491 consecutive patients undergoing 1991 ERCP procedures, identified, based on pre- and intra-procedural covariables, risk factors related to patient and procedure for EA, in order to develop, through a multivariate logistic regression analysis, a predictive score estimating the likelihood of the occurrence of EA post-ERCP. This would allow a more correct information to the patient about the procedure and an optimization of the decision making of the physician in charge of the patient. Two two models, one considering only pre-procedural factors (model 1) and the other that considers both pre- and intra-procedural factors (model 2); both showed moderate predictive ability (AUC-ROC of 0.668 and 0.684 respectively). The score is based on data from patients from a single institution and has not been validated prospectively or externally to the population on which it was developed. The main objective of the study is: the identification of independent factors associated with an increased risk of post-ERCP complications. The secondary objectives are: the development of a predictive model of events post-ERCP adverse events and its validation; geographic validation of a predictive model already published in the literature \[12\] using data collected during the study and the evaluation of the rate of post-ERCP AEs in the centers involved in the study.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

CROSS_SECTIONAL

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients undergoing ERCP according to normal clinical practice

The validation of the present predictive model and the one already published in the Literature will involve the simple application of the two models to a cohort of patients (so-called validation group), undergoing ERCP according to normal clinical practice; therefore, there will be no interventions that would may alter the patient's normal course of treatment.

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \>18 years
* Patients admitted with hepato-biliary-pancreatic disease or other pathological conditions that require treatment by ERCP
* Obtaining informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* None
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Lorenzo Lorenzo, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Lorenzo Fuccio, MD

Role: CONTACT

0512143338

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Lorenzo Fuccio, MD

Role: primary

0512143338

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ADVERCP

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Risk Factors of Post-ERCP Sepsis
NCT06187168 RECRUITING