A Study to Investigate the Efficacy of Pain Reduction With Cryoneurolysis Compared With Sham-treatment in Adults With Trigeminal Neuralgia
NCT ID: NCT06213155
Last Updated: 2025-06-19
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-02-29
2026-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
We are looking to recruit up to 24 adults with trigeminal neuralgia to take part in this study. All participants will keep a daily diary for two weeks to track their headaches before starting the treatment. Then, they will be randomly assigned to either the treatment group or the sham group.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Two Types of Radiofrequency Treatment for Trigeminal Neuralgia
NCT07013500
Incidence of Intravascular (IV) Injection During Trigeminal Nerve Blocks
NCT04467398
Neurophysiologic Signatures of Trigeminal Neuralgia Pain
NCT03778177
Predictive Factors in Maxillary and Mandibular Nerve Radiofrequency Treatment for Trigeminal Neuralgia
NCT06240494
Paresthesia-free Peripheral Nerve Field Stimulation for Trigeminal Neuralgia (FreeST Trial)
NCT05615714
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Cryoneurolysis
Cryoneurolysis
Cryoneurolysis
Stimulation
Stimulation
Stimulation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cryoneurolysis
Cryoneurolysis
Stimulation
Stimulation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. A diagnosis of primary (classic and idiopathic) trigeminal neuralgia affecting the mandibular and/or maxillary division, verified by a neurologist
3. Ability to subclassify the trigeminal neuralgia according to the The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition, i.e. sufficient magnetic resonance (MR) evaluation is mandatory
4. History of minimum mean of three trigeminal neuralgia related pain paroxysms per day last 4 weeks
5. History of minimum average daily pain intensity NRS score (ADP) of 4 to10 last 4 weeks
6. In baseline minimum average daily pain intensity NRS score (ADP) of 4 to 10
7. In baseline minimum mean of three trigeminal neuralgia related pain paroxysms per day
8. Treatment refractory as defined in this study as failure to respond, pending an adequate trial in the opinion of the investigator, contraindications or intractable side effect to one of two medications:
1. Carbamazepine
2. Oxcarbazepine
9. Unaltered prophylactic TN medication regime 2 weeks prior to baseline, and be willing to keep regime unaltered during the baseline and the blinded study period.
10. Be an appropriate candidate for the study intervention required in this study on the basis of the clinical judgment of the investigator
11. Capable of giving signed informed consent as which includes compliance with the requirements and restrictions listed in the informed consent form (ICF) and in this protocol.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Other pain conditions, not intended to be treated in this study, that in the opinion of the investigator could interfere with study procedures, accurate pain reporting, and/or confound evaluation of study endpoints.
3. High probability of neurological deterioration due to other medical conditions, that in the opinion of the investigator may confound outcome assessment.
4. Patients exhibiting a high degree of comorbidity and/or frailty associated with reduced life expectancy or high likelihood of hospitalization, at the discretion of the investigator.
5. Other coexisting current medical conditions, including, but not limited to, bleeding diathesis and thrombophilia, that presents excess procedural risk, in the opinion of the investigator.
6. Have within 6 months of enrollment a significant untreated addiction to dependency- producing medications, alcohol, or illicit drugs.
7. Abnormal pain behavior, inappropriate medication use and/or unresolved psychiatric illness, that in the opinion of the investigator are significant enough to impact perception of pain, compliance with intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome.
8. Subject has had previous radiofrequency ablation (including non-lesional pulsed radiofrequency), balloon compression, gamma knife, or chemical denervation (e.g. glycerol treatments) of the Gasserian ganglion.
9. Subject has had previous radiofrequency ablation (including non-lesional pulsed radiofrequency), balloon compression, gamma knife, or chemical denervation (e.g. glycerol treatments) of a division or branch of the trigeminal nerve being targeted in this study.
10. Facial anomaly or trauma which renders the planned procedure difficult.
11. Subject currently has an active oral or dental abscess or a local infection at the site of injection based on present symptoms.
12. Subject has been diagnosed with any major infectious processes such as osteomyelitis, or primary or secondary malignancies involving the face that have been active or required treatment in the past 6 months.
13. Current participation in another treatment study
14. Sensory deficits and/or pain configuration supporting, in the opinion of the neurologist, trigeminal neuropathy as more likely diagnosis.
15. Patients with any kind of conductive implant with contraindication for nerve stimulation according to study innervation.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
St. Olavs Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
St. Olavs University Hospital
Trondheim, , Norway
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
630286
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.