Short-Term Effect Of Ceriter Stride One (CSO) on FOG and Falling in pwP
NCT ID: NCT06204081
Last Updated: 2024-06-05
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
11 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-12-05
2024-05-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of the study is to explore the short-term effects of the CSO in terms of reducing (preventing) freezing of gait and fall risk in a pilot group of pwP whose functionality is limited (Hoehn and Yahr 4). Short-term impact on gait (episodes of freezing of gait, mean step length, mean gait speed) will be evaluated and user satisfaction surveyed.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Validity of the Ceriter Stride One in Measuring Gait and Pressure Parameters in Healthy Adults
NCT06164652
Adaptive Auditive Cueing As a Therapy for Freezing of Gait in Parkinson Patients
NCT04274478
Digital Wearable Walking Aid for Freezing of Gait in Parkinson´s Disease
NCT03978507
Understand FoG in PD: Behavioral Physiology and Clinical Application
NCT02987140
DetectFoG : Detection of Gait Freezing Episodes in Parkinsonian Patients Using Inertial Measurement Units
NCT05822258
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
These principles are implemented with the CSO : the device makes the pmP stop at onset of propulsion and generates an auditory, rhythmic cue to facilitate starting and walking with larger steps (prevention).
This is an innovative application, not a standard-of-care intervention.
Protocol :
20 persons with Parkinson's disease (H\&Y 4) (attending physical therapy at Movita).
The test proceeds in 3 stages : preparation / gait test / subjective evaluation :
Preparation
* Info / IC
* General data : age, sex, number of years since diagnosis, use of aids, medication, fall incidents last week (fall diary based on fall diary), (last intake) medication and current efficacy (VAS).
* MDS-UPDRS-II (degree of dependence), nFOGQ, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA).
Clinical gait test :
The soles are placed in the patient's shoes. If the patient uses an assistive device in daily life, the test is performed with an assistive device.
Following procedure is done in a randomized order\*:
\- Walking without auditory cue: for 3 minutes, the patient is asked to walk back and forth at a comfortable pace on a 4-meter course through a doorway (start : 2 meters before the doorway, stop : 2 meters beyond the doorway) without any auditory support. If no freezing occurs during this period, pwP is asked to turn 360° in the doorway.
The first 1.5 minutes gait is performed without a double task, the next 1.5 minutes with a cognitive double task (100 - 3 = ... - 3 = ... -3 = ...).
\- Walking with auditory cues: for 3 minutes the patient is asked to walk back and forth at a comfortable pace along a 4-meter course through a doorway (start : 2 meters in front of the doorway, stop : 2 meters beyond the doorway) with auditory cues given at the occurrence of a freeze. If no FOG occured, the pwP is asked to turn 360° in the doorway.
The first 1.5 minutes gait is performed without a dual task, the next 1.5 minutes with a cognitive dual task (100 - 3 = ... - 3 = ... -3 = ...).
After each condition (with - without auditory cueing) a short break (2 minutes) is taken, during which a Borg scale for fatigue is taken. After the second condition, satisfaction with the effect of the aid is questioned (see below).
The entire gait test is filmed (by a 2nd person). In this way data, including the number of freezing episodes, can be checked.
\*Randomization of conditions: per 2 patients. The first patient draws a card indicating whether or not the patient starts with auditory cues while walking. The 2nd patient then starts with the other condition, and so on. Thus we obtain 10 patients starting with the auditory cueing condition and 10 without.
Parameters considered : duration/step, gait asymmetry (pressure of left foot vs. right foot), number of freezing periods, distance walked, number of steps, mean step length.
Satisfaction questions
* On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the level of comfort of the Ceriter Stride One?
* On a scale of 1 to 10, how safe do you feel when using the Ceriter Stride One?
* To what extent do you feel more secure, on a scale of 1 to 10, while walking by using the Ceriter Stride One?
* Open question : do you have any comments, concerns or questions of your own?
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
persons with Parkinson's Disease, Hoehn & Yahr stage 4, FOG
This group tests first without the use of cues (CSO evaluates gait pattern, but does not adjust), and then with cues.
CSO_without cueing
The sole is worn without using the cueing application
CSO_cueing
The sole is worn with using the cueing application
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CSO_without cueing
The sole is worn without using the cueing application
CSO_cueing
The sole is worn with using the cueing application
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* gait impairment with freezing of gait (FOG)
* 18-80 years old
* I.C. (informed consent)
* Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) \>25
Exclusion Criteria
* MoCA \< 25
* no FOG
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Ghent
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dirk Cambier, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UGent, FGE
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ghent University
Ghent, Oost-Vlaanderen, Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Zoetewei D, Herman T, Brozgol M, Ginis P, Thumm PC, Ceulemans E, Decaluwe E, Palmerini L, Ferrari A, Nieuwboer A, Hausdorff JM. Protocol for the DeFOG trial: A randomized controlled trial on the effects of smartphone-based, on-demand cueing for freezing of gait in Parkinson's disease. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2021 Jun 29;24:100817. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100817. eCollection 2021 Dec.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
protocol of the DeFOG trial
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ONZ - 2023 - 0501
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.