Vascular Closure With Novel External Compression Device: The LockeT Study
NCT ID: NCT06199414
Last Updated: 2024-01-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
70 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-01-31
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Vascular Closure With a Device Compared to Manual Compression After Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: The LockeT II Study
NCT06078735
Venous Vascular Closure System Versus Manual Compression Following Single Shot Device AF Ablation
NCT05563142
Impact of Steerable Delivery Sheaths on Successful Closure of LA A With AMULET
NCT05464511
Multimodality Evaluation of LAA Leaks Arising After Incomplete LAAC: Insights From the LAA-Leak Registry
NCT05131308
VAscular Closure for Cardiac Ablation Registry (VACCAR)
NCT03546439
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Other methods of vascular closure include figure-of-eight (F-8) a, subcutaneous suture or Z-stitch or fellow's stitch has been evaluated as a means to achieve homeostasis following major cardiovascular procedures. One pooled meta-analysis of six studies including 982 patients demonstrated that F-8 is safe and effective means of achieving hemostasis. In comparison to MC time to hemostasis was significantly lower and overall access site complications like hematoma, bleeding was also noted to be lower in F-8 group.
In recent years, invasive, vascular closure devices have become popular. However, results continue to suggest that the risk versus benefit has not been definitively demonstrated. LockeT is a new suture retention device designed to closely mimic manual compression without the need for a healthcare professional to stand bedside.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Subjects with Figure-of-eight (F-8) suture
This is the group of subjects for whom Figure-of-eight (F-8) suture is used for their venous closure.
Venous Closure
Vascular closure to achieve vascular hemostasis following femoral access with large bore sheaths in catheter ablation procedures
Subjects with LockeT Device
This is the group of subjects for whom LockeT device is used for their venous closure.
Venous Closure
Vascular closure to achieve vascular hemostasis following femoral access with large bore sheaths in catheter ablation procedures
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Venous Closure
Vascular closure to achieve vascular hemostasis following femoral access with large bore sheaths in catheter ablation procedures
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Subjects must be at least 18 years of age.
* Subjects underwent Atrial Fibrillation radiofrequency ablation procedure.
* Subjects must have undergone F-8 or LockeT for venous closure.
Exclusion Criteria
* Subjects under the age of 18.
* Subject's electrophysiology procedure is not planned to access the left atrium or ventricle.
* Subjects in which F-8 or a LockeT was not used.
* If the EP physician detected a formed hematoma prior to venous closure, that patient will be excluded from the study.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Research Foundation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute - Roe Clinic
Overland Park, Kansas, United States
Overland Park Regional Medical Center
Overland Park, Kansas, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Donita Atkins
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Natale A, Mohanty S, Liu PY, Mittal S, Al-Ahmad A, De Lurgio DB, Horton R, Spear W, Bailey S, Bunch J, Musat D, O'Neill P, Compton S, Turakhia MP; AMBULATE Trial Investigators. Venous Vascular Closure System Versus Manual Compression Following Multiple Access Electrophysiology Procedures: The AMBULATE Trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Jan;6(1):111-124. doi: 10.1016/j.jacep.2019.08.013. Epub 2019 Oct 30.
Mujer MT, Al-Abcha A, Flores J, Saleh Y, Robinson P. A comparison of figure-of-8-suture versus manual compression for venous access closure after cardiac procedures: An updated meta-analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2020 Aug;43(8):856-865. doi: 10.1111/pace.14008. Epub 2020 Jul 20.
Atti V, Turagam MK, Garg J, Alratroot A, Abela GS, Rayamajhi S, Lakkireddy D. Efficacy and safety of figure-of-eight suture versus manual pressure for venous access closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2020 Apr;57(3):379-385. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00547-6. Epub 2019 Apr 18.
Jensen CJ, Schnur M, Lask S, Attanasio P, Gotzmann M, Kara K, Hanefeld C, Mugge A, Wutzler A. Feasibility of the Figure-of-8-Suture as Venous Closure in Interventional Electrophysiology: One Strategy for All? Int J Med Sci. 2020 Apr 6;17(7):965-969. doi: 10.7150/ijms.42593. eCollection 2020.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
KCHRRF_LockeT Retrospect_0020
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.