Impact of Steerable Delivery Sheaths on Successful Closure of LA A With AMULET

NCT ID: NCT05464511

Last Updated: 2025-08-28

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

300 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2026-01-31

Study Completion Date

2026-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The novel Amplatzer steerable delivery sheath (Abbott Vascular) is found to be safe and effective in performing LAAO procedure. However, the procedural outcomes have not been compared with the traditional non-steerable fixed curve sheath. In this study investigators aim to compare the outcome of patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion with the dual mechanism closure Amulet device using non-steerable fixed curve sheath versus a novel steerable sheath.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common abnormal heart rhythm associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. It is one of the strongest risk factors of systemic thromboembolism (TE), with stroke being the most serious outcome. Prevention of stroke is the cornerstone of managing AF, which can be achieved either by oral anticoagulation (OAC) or Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) in patients who have a contraindication to OAC. Heterogeneity in cardiac chamber size, interatrial septum, LAA anatomy and orientation, operator experience and currently available fixed curve sheaths add to the complexity of the procedure. Alignment of LAAO device along the access of the left atrial appendage body is an important factor in improving closure rates. The devices which are currently approved by FDA for LAA closure in the U.S. are Amplatzer Amulet device (Abbott Medical) and Watchman and Watchman FLX devices (Boston Scientific). In a recent study, Amplatzer Amulet device was found to be noninferior in terms of safety and effectiveness, with superior LAA occlusion rates but higher device-related complications as compared to first generation watchman device. The LAAO device sheaths that are used currently have fixed shapes and angles that may not be optimal for some LAA anatomy, which can lead to excessive device manipulation, prolonged procedure time, and potentially suboptimal co-axiality during the process. This may lead to increase device related complications. The new Amplatzer steerable delivery sheath (Abbott Vascular) is designed to provide distal bidirectional steerability of the sheath for Amulet implantation. Such steerability may enable successful endovascular closure of greater proportion of LAA, allow precise position of the transseptal puncture, and potentially reduce procedural times and complications with complex cases.

Investigators hypothesize that the use of novel steerable sheath for LAAO closure is safer and more effective as compared to non-steerable fixed curve sheath

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Atrial Fibrillation Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This will be a multi-centered, retrospective as well as prospective observational registry with patients undergoing LAAO with the dual mechanism closure Amulet device. This study will proceed with a target of 300 patients who have undergone or are planned to undergo LAAO with dual mechanism closure Amulet device. Patient level data of participating centers will be obtained from National Cardiovascular Data Registry (NCDR®) of patients who have already had the procedure. Prospective data will be collected for all patients willing to participate in the study.
Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Patients with Amulet device using non-steerable fixed curve sheath

Patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion with the dual mechanism closure Amulet device using non-steerable fixed curve sheath.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Patients with Amulet device using a novel steerable sheath

Patients undergoing left atrial appendage occlusion with the dual mechanism closure Amulet device using a novel steerable sheath.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Left atrial appendage occlusion with the dual mechanism closure Amulet device using a novel steerable sheath.

Intervention Type OTHER

Left atrial appendage occlusion with the dual mechanism closure Amulet device using a novel steerable sheath.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Left atrial appendage occlusion with the dual mechanism closure Amulet device using a novel steerable sheath.

Left atrial appendage occlusion with the dual mechanism closure Amulet device using a novel steerable sheath.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Patients with atrial fibrillation who meets the indication/criteria for left atrial appendage occlusion and undergoing implantation of Amplatzer™ Amulet™ Left Atrial Appendage Occluder device

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient been/being implanted with device other than Amplatzer™ Amulet™ Left Atrial Appendage Occluder
* Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
* Prisoners
* Patients not willing to participate in the study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kansas City Heart Rhythm Research Foundation

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Menorah Medical Center

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Overland Park Regional Medical Center

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Centerpoint Medical Center Clinic

Independence, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Centerpoint Medical Center

Independence, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Medical Center Clinic

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Research Medical Center

Kansas City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Donita Atkins

Role: CONTACT

816-651-1969

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gangireddy SR, Halperin JL, Fuster V, Reddy VY. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation: an assessment of net clinical benefit. Eur Heart J. 2012 Nov;33(21):2700-8. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs292. Epub 2012 Sep 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23008509 (View on PubMed)

Reddy VY, Sievert H, Halperin J, Doshi SK, Buchbinder M, Neuzil P, Huber K, Whisenant B, Kar S, Swarup V, Gordon N, Holmes D; PROTECT AF Steering Committee and Investigators. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure vs warfarin for atrial fibrillation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014 Nov 19;312(19):1988-98. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.15192.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25399274 (View on PubMed)

Jazayeri MA, Vuddanda V, Parikh V, Lakkireddy DR. Percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: current state of the art. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017 Jan;32(1):27-38. doi: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000367.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27898435 (View on PubMed)

Lakkireddy D, Thaler D, Ellis CR, Swarup V, Sondergaard L, Carroll J, Gold MR, Hermiller J, Diener HC, Schmidt B, MacDonald L, Mansour M, Maini B, O'Brien L, Windecker S. Amplatzer Amulet Left Atrial Appendage Occluder Versus Watchman Device for Stroke Prophylaxis (Amulet IDE): A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Circulation. 2021 Nov 9;144(19):1543-1552. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057063. Epub 2021 Aug 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34459659 (View on PubMed)

Saw J, Perrin N, Nestelberger T, Mondesert B, Tsang M, Ibrahim R. First-in-Human Experience With the Amplatzer Steerable Delivery Sheath for Left Atrial Appendage Closure. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Oct 11;14(19):2191-2193. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.07.022. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34620400 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

KCHRRF-STEERRCLOSE-0015

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Zenith LAA Occlusion System
NCT05951101 RECRUITING NA