Community Based Group Psychoeducation for Relatives of Individuals With Mental Illness
NCT ID: NCT06190262
Last Updated: 2025-03-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
744 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-08
2025-01-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The main questions it aims to answer are:
* What is the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention?
* What is the preliminary effect of the intervention?
Participants self-select to the intervention and participation in the evaluation is voluntary. Participants will be asked to:
* Answer a questionnaire before and after their participation
* Some participants will be invited for an in-depth interview
There is no comparison group, but feasibility and acceptability will also be explored by asking the implementation team (e.g. project leaders and teachers) to participate in:
* In-depth interviews
* Answering shorter questionnaires about provider acceptability
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Psychoeducation to Sick-listed Individuals With Mental Health Problems
NCT01637363
Intervention in Groups of Family Caregivers in Primary Health Care
NCT01177696
Psychosocial Adjustment of Patients and Their Partners Following Breast Cancer Diagnosis
NCT01392066
The Impact of a Psycho-educational Program for Family Members of Individuals With Borderline Personality Disorder
NCT06074289
Evaluation of Efficiency of One Day Patient/Caregiver Psychoeducation on the Caregiver's Burden
NCT05178966
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The group-based psychoeducational program focuses on enhancing informal caregivers' or relatives' understanding of their loved ones' mental illnesses and equips them with coping strategies. The main goal is to improve caregivers' knowledge of mental illnesses and their ability to navigate in their daily life/their role as an informal caregiver without becoming overburdened.
The specific program was collaboratively developed by a non-government organization and the regional psychiatry in one of Denmarks five Regions. Participants self-select to the program and participation is free of cost.
The program consists of six sessions, two of which are conducted online. The program is designed for groups of 16-20 individuals.
Session 1: The first session serves as an introduction to the program, where participants get acquainted with each other and familiarize themselves with the program's content. During this session, participants are encouraged to establish their own rules while also discussing the "Chatham House rules."
Session 2: Moving on to the second session, the focus is on disseminating knowledge about mental illnesses, treatment, and the distinctions between regional psychiatry and community-based treatments. A compassion-focused exercise is also included during this session.
Session 3: The third session centers on providing information about various treatment opportunities, exploring different types of treatment in addition to medication and talk therapy. Moreover, participants gain insights into how they can be involved in the treatment process if the patient provides their consent. This session is conducted online.
Session 4: The fourth session delves into the caregiver role and self-care strategies. Participants are introduced to different coping-strategies.
Session 5: In the fifth session, the focus shifts to the rights of the participants, such as their entitlement to care days and information about other caregiver interventions in the community. This session is conducted online.
Session 6: Finally, in the last session, all the topics covered throughout the program are summarized, and support groups are established to provide ongoing assistance and encouragement.
In 2024, around 24 courses will be offered, each spanning a duration of 35-70 days. The sessions will be conducted. The sessions will be scheduled either weekly (with 6 sessions over a 35-day period) or bi-weekly (with 6 sessions over a 70-day period).
The evaluation:
All participants in the program will be asked to participate in the evaluation. Participation in the evaluation is completely voluntary.
The primary purpose of the evaluation is to use the results of the evaluation to continuously revise the program to reflect the needs of the participants. By the end of 2025, the program will have undergone the last revision, and be ready to move on to a full evaluation using a RCT design. Thus, in line with guidance from the UK Medical Council Research Framework (MRC) and the National Institute of Health Research framework, the present study is an initial step in determining if the developed intervention is feasible and acceptable for relatives to individuals with mental illness. A mixed-methods approach was chosen to explore indications of participants' response and view to the intervention and thereby gain a more full understanding of the intervention acceptability and feasibility.
The principal aims of this study are as follows:
1. To assess the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention, the investigators aim to:
1. Quantify recruitment rate and attendance rate
2. Measure participants' satisfaction with the intervention
3. Qualitatively explore participants satisfaction and their ideas for development
4. By using purposeful sampling strategies, some participants will be invited to take part in an in-depth interview about their experience with the program and about their perspective on facilitators and barriers of the intervention. They will also be asked about how to improve the program in the future.
2. To assess the preliminary effectiveness of the intervention, participants are asked to:
1. Self-report on their well-being before and after the intervention
2. Self-report on their level of burnout before and after the intervention
3. Self-report on their level of resilient coping before and after the intervention
This evidence will provide an initial indication of whether the intervention can contribute to change within this group. Estimated effect sizes will provide the parameters for a definitive randomized controlled trial. Data will be explored using the reliable and clinically significant change analysis. This analysis allows pre- and post-treatment scores to be compared to see if participants have achieved a level of difference that could be categorized as real and not due to measurement error. Furthermore this score can be helpful to determine if the change seen is clinically significant.
3. To assess feasibility and acceptability from the providers, the investigators aim to:
1. Conduct in-depth interviews with members of the implementation teams (such as project leaders and teachers in the program).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Psychoeducation
The experimental condition consists of a psychoeducation program with six sessions. Two of the sessions are online. A teacher and a volunteer will lead the sessions. The topic of the sessions are diverse and cover topics such as mental illness, the diathesis-stress model, treatment of mental illness, caregiver coping mechanisms and caregiver rights.
Before the first session, participants are asked to fill in an online questionnaire with background information and well-being indicators. After the last session, participants are asked to fill in another short questionnaire with the same well-being indicators and also a measure of their satisfaction with the program.
The intervention is community based group psychoeducation
The intervention is community based group psychoeducation
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
The intervention is community based group psychoeducation
The intervention is community based group psychoeducation
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to read, speak, and understand the Danish langugage
* Relative/informal caregiver of an individual with a mental illness
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Region of Southern Denmark
OTHER
OPEN, Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Region of Southern Denmark
UNKNOWN
University of Southern Denmark
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Rikke Amalie Agergaard Jensen, Ph.d.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Department of Regional Health Research, University of Southern Denmark
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Center for Involvement of Relatioves
Vejle, , Denmark
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Sinclair VG, Wallston KA. The development and psychometric evaluation of the Brief Resilient Coping Scale. Assessment. 2004 Mar;11(1):94-101. doi: 10.1177/1073191103258144.
Topp CW, Ostergaard SD, Sondergaard S, Bech P. The WHO-5 Well-Being Index: a systematic review of the literature. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84(3):167-76. doi: 10.1159/000376585. Epub 2015 Mar 28.
Funk JL, Rogge RD. Testing the ruler with item response theory: increasing precision of measurement for relationship satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. J Fam Psychol. 2007 Dec;21(4):572-83. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572.
Morley S, Williams A, Hussain S. Estimating the clinical effectiveness of cognitive behavioural therapy in the clinic: evaluation of a CBT informed pain management programme. Pain. 2008 Jul 31;137(3):670-680. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2008.02.025. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
S-20232000 - 66
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
23/25502
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
23/70733
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
OP_1919
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.