Supporting Patients by Family Education in Psychotic Illness: A Prospective Cohort Study
NCT ID: NCT05500001
Last Updated: 2025-11-18
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
RECRUITING
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
113 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2022-09-01
Study Completion Date
2026-09-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Background: A lack of education, resources, and support for family carers of young adults with psychotic illnesses leaves them ill-equipped to support their loved one. Although family support groups exist, few groups offer evidence-based, skills-focused, psychoeducation taught by certified professionals and provided on a public-health level. By equipping families with skills and knowledge, public healthcare harnesses a powerful ally to maintain community stabilization.
Aims: The primary study goal is to implement a psychoeducation intervention for family carers supporting young adults with psychosis to reduce family burden and foster community stabilization of service users.
Methods: A longitudinal pre-post design will be used to assess the long-term effectiveness of the psychoeducation intervention for family carers supporting a young adult with psychosis on service utilization and functional indexes. Nine expert-reviewed, and family peer-informed psychoeducation modules are administered in 2-hour sessions over 9 weeks to family carers.
Conclusion: Presenting the novel approach of an expert-reviewed, peer-informed psychoeducation intervention for family carers, with a focus on knowledge and skill development, the researchers contribute to literature and best practice in patient and family-centered care.
Aims: The primary study goal is to implement a psychoeducation intervention for family carers supporting young adults with psychosis to reduce family burden and foster community stabilization of service users.
Methods: A longitudinal pre-post design will be used to assess the long-term effectiveness of the psychoeducation intervention for family carers supporting a young adult with psychosis on service utilization and functional indexes. Nine expert-reviewed, and family peer-informed psychoeducation modules are administered in 2-hour sessions over 9 weeks to family carers.
Conclusion: Presenting the novel approach of an expert-reviewed, peer-informed psychoeducation intervention for family carers, with a focus on knowledge and skill development, the researchers contribute to literature and best practice in patient and family-centered care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Genetic Counseling for Female First Degree Relatives of Individuals With Mental Illness
NCT00714818
Schizophrenia
Bipolar Disorder
Schizoaffective Disorder
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Caring for the Carer
NCT07167641
Care Burden
Care Giving Burden
Caregiver Burnout
+1 more
RECRUITING
NA
Stepped Care for Youth at Risk of Psychosis
NCT04829292
Clinical High Risk for Developing Psychosis
RECRUITING
NA
Community Based Group Psychoeducation for Relatives of Individuals With Mental Illness
NCT06190262
Caregiver Burden
Caregiver Burnout
Well-Being, Psychological
+2 more
COMPLETED
NA
The Effect of Nonviolent Resistance in Parent Group Training in Child Psychiatric Care
NCT05086328
Helplessness, Learned
Family Conflict
Mentalising
+1 more
UNKNOWN
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Background:
A lack of education, resources, and support for family carers of young adults with psychotic illnesses leaves them ill-equipped to support their loved one. Often family carers are excluded from the discharge planning process or are unaware of how to support of their loved one in community. Although best practice documents champion family involvement the implementation of these guidelines is challenge and families are often excluded from care.There is evidence of the disparity between best practice documents and true practice in the literature.
Family inclusion also addresses the impact of psychotic disease on the family's functioning and mental health. Psychotic illness (e.g., anosognosia, paranoia) can interfere with relational health and the natural maturation of family relationships over time. Families face extreme challenges when supporting a young adult with psychotic illness including social isolation, likely because their typical social supports are unable to relate to their situation, prompting them to seek support with those who share their situation (i.e., family support groups). Family carers, even in the face of these hardships, work with great tenacity toward improving service user stability in community.
There is a lack of high-quality effectiveness research showing longitudinal evidence for treatment effects on the carer and the young person in family psychoeducation groups. For example, one study provided a family intervention that was primarily knowledge- and support-based. These researchers used a pre-post design to assess the mental health knowledge, but did not assess long-term effectiveness of the group, overall family functioning, and functioning of the service user.
The intent for this longitudinal pre-post study is to evaluate the effect of skills-based educational programming for family carers supporting young adults admitted to or discharged from hospital with psychosis of any etiology on 6-month and 24-month service user readmission rates and service user/family functional indexes. The investigators hypothesize that system integration of a program which delivers early support for the family carers by way of an educational intervention beginning prior to or shortly after hospital discharge may reduce family burden as well as improve short- and long-term patient outcomes. To the investigators' knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate effectiveness of a family carer skills-based education intervention within a public healthcare system.
The investigators will use a longitudinal pretest-posttest design with a non-equivalent control group to evaluate the short- and long-term effectiveness of this family psychoeducation intervention. While a control group can be used for comparison of the service utilization data for young adults with psychosis using archival data from health records, gathering long-term control group data from families not participating in the trial is unethical in that denial of an intervention for up to two years is potentially harmful to both the families and the young adult they support. Likewise, control group data gathered directly from young adult service users presents the same ethical problem. Using archival health utilization data, however, allows us to exclude any service users' whose families have elected to access the psychoeducation program within the 2-year timeframe of the study. This allows us to find control data for health service utilization while not withholding the psychoeducation intervention from those who seek it. The investigators acknowledge that the control group is non-equivalent because families and service users who chose not to engage in the study may vary systematically from those who did.
Each measure will be taken pre-intervention (i.e., baseline), post-intervention, then again at 6- and 24-months post-intervention. A gift card incentive ($25.00 per data collection meeting) will be provided to family and young adult participants as a token of appreciation for their participation.
Service utilization data will be collected for 12-months pre-intervention to be compared to 12-months post-intervention and 12-24 months post-intervention.
Recruitment:
Study information will be disseminated by clinical teams and through community organizations, and family carers meeting eligibility criteria will self-identify for participation. Once recruited, and with family consent, young adult service users of participating family carers will be contacted for recruitment into the study.
Measures:
A variety of measures will be used to collect functional index data for the family members and the young adult service users. Health utilization data will be mined for 12-months pre-intervention, and up to 24-months post-intervention to assess long term service user outcomes. See Outcome Measures section for details.
Secondary Data Control Group:
While randomization into treatment and control groups was not feasible for this study, non-equivalent control group data can be mined from health records for young adults whose family did not participate in the study.
Intervention:
The educational modules are developed by experts in the areas of interest and are evidence based, family peer-informed and expert peer-reviewed. The curriculum consists of 9 modules delivered weekly over 9 weeks. Evidence-based content includes the Listen-Empathize-Agree-Partner (LEAP) communication Program, and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. The family psychoeducation classes are to take place at a designated AHS location.
Limitations and Conclusion:
The described protocol is one of the first attempts in the literature to evaluate an evidence-based intervention for carers of young adults with psychotic illness. The current study builds on others by incorporating psychoeducational elements, modules specific to the LEAP approach, and modules specific to ACT. Furthermore, the design of the study intends to gather longitudinal 24-month post-intervention data from carers and service users, including health service utilization data.
Several limitations must be considered with regards to this protocol. First, using a pre-post design the investigators cannot draw causal conclusions regarding the effect of the intervention. To address this limitation the investigators will use secondary data from health records as a non-equivalent control group for health utilization data. A second limitation is that participants self-select for the study, and may differ systematically from those who choose not to participate. For example, the sample will likely be biased towards families who are already supportive and involved in their young adults' care. The sample of young adults participating will be additionally biased because those who are especially unwell may be unable to participate. By comparing the health utilization data of the participants to the nonequivalent control group in a longitudinal design the investigators will gain some evidence to rule out history effects. Even with these limitations, the described design builds on existing knowledge of effective family psychoeducation groups and their long term effects on young adults experiencing psychosis.
A lack of education, resources, and support for family carers of young adults with psychotic illnesses leaves them ill-equipped to support their loved one. Often family carers are excluded from the discharge planning process or are unaware of how to support of their loved one in community. Although best practice documents champion family involvement the implementation of these guidelines is challenge and families are often excluded from care.There is evidence of the disparity between best practice documents and true practice in the literature.
Family inclusion also addresses the impact of psychotic disease on the family's functioning and mental health. Psychotic illness (e.g., anosognosia, paranoia) can interfere with relational health and the natural maturation of family relationships over time. Families face extreme challenges when supporting a young adult with psychotic illness including social isolation, likely because their typical social supports are unable to relate to their situation, prompting them to seek support with those who share their situation (i.e., family support groups). Family carers, even in the face of these hardships, work with great tenacity toward improving service user stability in community.
There is a lack of high-quality effectiveness research showing longitudinal evidence for treatment effects on the carer and the young person in family psychoeducation groups. For example, one study provided a family intervention that was primarily knowledge- and support-based. These researchers used a pre-post design to assess the mental health knowledge, but did not assess long-term effectiveness of the group, overall family functioning, and functioning of the service user.
The intent for this longitudinal pre-post study is to evaluate the effect of skills-based educational programming for family carers supporting young adults admitted to or discharged from hospital with psychosis of any etiology on 6-month and 24-month service user readmission rates and service user/family functional indexes. The investigators hypothesize that system integration of a program which delivers early support for the family carers by way of an educational intervention beginning prior to or shortly after hospital discharge may reduce family burden as well as improve short- and long-term patient outcomes. To the investigators' knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate effectiveness of a family carer skills-based education intervention within a public healthcare system.
The investigators will use a longitudinal pretest-posttest design with a non-equivalent control group to evaluate the short- and long-term effectiveness of this family psychoeducation intervention. While a control group can be used for comparison of the service utilization data for young adults with psychosis using archival data from health records, gathering long-term control group data from families not participating in the trial is unethical in that denial of an intervention for up to two years is potentially harmful to both the families and the young adult they support. Likewise, control group data gathered directly from young adult service users presents the same ethical problem. Using archival health utilization data, however, allows us to exclude any service users' whose families have elected to access the psychoeducation program within the 2-year timeframe of the study. This allows us to find control data for health service utilization while not withholding the psychoeducation intervention from those who seek it. The investigators acknowledge that the control group is non-equivalent because families and service users who chose not to engage in the study may vary systematically from those who did.
Each measure will be taken pre-intervention (i.e., baseline), post-intervention, then again at 6- and 24-months post-intervention. A gift card incentive ($25.00 per data collection meeting) will be provided to family and young adult participants as a token of appreciation for their participation.
Service utilization data will be collected for 12-months pre-intervention to be compared to 12-months post-intervention and 12-24 months post-intervention.
Recruitment:
Study information will be disseminated by clinical teams and through community organizations, and family carers meeting eligibility criteria will self-identify for participation. Once recruited, and with family consent, young adult service users of participating family carers will be contacted for recruitment into the study.
Measures:
A variety of measures will be used to collect functional index data for the family members and the young adult service users. Health utilization data will be mined for 12-months pre-intervention, and up to 24-months post-intervention to assess long term service user outcomes. See Outcome Measures section for details.
Secondary Data Control Group:
While randomization into treatment and control groups was not feasible for this study, non-equivalent control group data can be mined from health records for young adults whose family did not participate in the study.
Intervention:
The educational modules are developed by experts in the areas of interest and are evidence based, family peer-informed and expert peer-reviewed. The curriculum consists of 9 modules delivered weekly over 9 weeks. Evidence-based content includes the Listen-Empathize-Agree-Partner (LEAP) communication Program, and Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. The family psychoeducation classes are to take place at a designated AHS location.
Limitations and Conclusion:
The described protocol is one of the first attempts in the literature to evaluate an evidence-based intervention for carers of young adults with psychotic illness. The current study builds on others by incorporating psychoeducational elements, modules specific to the LEAP approach, and modules specific to ACT. Furthermore, the design of the study intends to gather longitudinal 24-month post-intervention data from carers and service users, including health service utilization data.
Several limitations must be considered with regards to this protocol. First, using a pre-post design the investigators cannot draw causal conclusions regarding the effect of the intervention. To address this limitation the investigators will use secondary data from health records as a non-equivalent control group for health utilization data. A second limitation is that participants self-select for the study, and may differ systematically from those who choose not to participate. For example, the sample will likely be biased towards families who are already supportive and involved in their young adults' care. The sample of young adults participating will be additionally biased because those who are especially unwell may be unable to participate. By comparing the health utilization data of the participants to the nonequivalent control group in a longitudinal design the investigators will gain some evidence to rule out history effects. Even with these limitations, the described design builds on existing knowledge of effective family psychoeducation groups and their long term effects on young adults experiencing psychosis.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Psychotic Disorders
Family Members
Anosognosia
Paranoia
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
NA
Intervention Model
SINGLE_GROUP
A longitudinal pre-post study design will be used. A non-equivalent comparison group will be available for some measures.
Primary Study Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Blinding Strategy
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Family Psychoeducation Intervention Arm
These participants will receive the psychoeducation intervention and outcome measures will be taken from them and their young adult service user. The intervention includes psychoeducation on stages of a family's journey, the biopsychosocial basis of psychosis, and skills for coping (Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for Caregivers) and communicating (LEAP).
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
Supporting Patients by Family Education in Psychotic Illness Group
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
Psychoeducation for families supporting young adults with psychosis.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Supporting Patients by Family Education in Psychotic Illness Group
Psychoeducation for families supporting young adults with psychosis.
Intervention Type
BEHAVIORAL
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Young adult service user is aged 17-27 at time of recruitment
* Young adult service user has had an admission or discharge from an Alberta Health Services or Covenant Health psychiatric unit for psychosis in the Edmonton Zone within previous 12-months
* Young adult service user has had an admission or discharge from an Alberta Health Services or Covenant Health psychiatric unit for psychosis in the Edmonton Zone within previous 12-months
Exclusion Criteria
* Not proficient in English
* Young adult service user has NOT had an admission or discharge from an Alberta Health Services or Covenant Health psychiatric unit for psychosis in the Edmonton Zone within previous 12-months
* Young adult service user has NOT had an admission or discharge from an Alberta Health Services or Covenant Health psychiatric unit for psychosis in the Edmonton Zone within previous 12-months
Minimum Eligible Age
17 Years
Maximum Eligible Age
27 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Alberta Health services
OTHER
Sponsor Role
collaborator
Families Supporting Adults with Mental Illness-Alberta
UNKNOWN
Sponsor Role
collaborator
University of Alberta
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Responsibility Role
SPONSOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Melanie Robles, md
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Alberta
Adam Abba-Aji, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Alberta Health services
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Royal Alexandra Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Site Status
RECRUITING
Alberta Hospital Edmonton
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Site Status
RECRUITING
University of Alberta Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Site Status
RECRUITING
Grey Nuns Community Hospital
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Site Status
RECRUITING
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Canada
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Alberta Health Services. (2018). Patient and Family Centered Care Resource Kit: How to Improve the Patient Experience. Quality and Healthcare Improvement, Engagement and Patient Experience Department.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Amador X. (2020).I Am Not Sick, I Don't Need Help! How To Help Someone Accept Treatment. New York: Vida Press
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
American Psychological Association [APA]. (2011). Family Interventions. Retrieved on August 9, 2022 from https://www.apa.org/pi/about/publications/caregivers/practice-settings/intervention/family
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Day, K., & Petrakis, M. (2017). Family interventions in early psychosis service delivery: A systematized review. Social Work in Mental Health, 15(6): 632-650. doi:10.1080/15332985.2016.1271381
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Day K, Starbuck R, Petrakis M. Family group interventions in an early psychosis program: A re-evaluation of practice after 10 years of service delivery. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2017 Aug;63(5):433-438. doi: 10.1177/0020764017710301. Epub 2017 May 24.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Early Psychosis Guidelines Writing Group and EPPIC National Support Program (2016). Australian Clinical Guidelines for Early Psychosis, 2nd edition update, Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Melbourne.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ewertzon M, Hanson E. Support Interventions for Family Members of Adults with Mental Illness: A Narrative Literature Review. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2019 Sep;40(9):768-780. doi: 10.1080/01612840.2019.1591547. Epub 2019 May 30.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Hayes, S.C., Strosahl, K.D., & Wilson, K.G. (1999)Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavior change. Guilford Press.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Jolley S, Johns LC, O'Donoghue E, Oliver J, Khondoker M, Byrne M, Butler L, De Rosa C, Leal D, McGovern J, Rasiukeviciute B, Sim F, Morris E. Group acceptance and commitment therapy for patients and caregivers in psychosis services: Feasibility of training and a preliminary randomized controlled evaluation. Br J Clin Psychol. 2020 Nov;59(4):524-551. doi: 10.1111/bjc.12265. Epub 2020 Sep 17.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kreyenbuhl J, Buchanan RW, Dickerson FB, Dixon LB; Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT). The Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT): updated treatment recommendations 2009. Schizophr Bull. 2010 Jan;36(1):94-103. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbp130. Epub 2009 Dec 2.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
MacCourt, P. (2013). Family Caregivers Advisory Committee, Mental Health Commission of Canada. National Guidelines for a Comprehensive Service System to Support Family Caregivers of Adults with Mental Health Problems and Illnesses. Calgary, AB: Mental Health Commission of Canada. Retrieved from: http://www.mentalhealthcommission.ca
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
McFarlane WR, Dixon L, Lukens E, Lucksted A. Family psychoeducation and schizophrenia: a review of the literature. J Marital Fam Ther. 2003 Apr;29(2):223-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2003.tb01202.x.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Poon, A.W.C., Curtis, J., Howard, A., Ward, P.B., & Lappin, J.M. (2019). Health of Carers of Young People with Early Psychosis: A Biopsychosocial Approach. Australian Social Work, 72(3): 260-273, DOI: 10.1080/0312407X.2018.1530269
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rachamim L, Nacasch N, Sinay I. Complicated Grief, Depression, Health and Attachment Style in First Degree Relatives of Individuals with a Chronic Psychotic Disorders. Community Ment Health J. 2022 Apr;58(3):526-535. doi: 10.1007/s10597-021-00848-z. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Rosas-Santiago, F.J., Genchi, J.J., Heredia, I.S., & Zamora, V.E.R. (2022). Psychoeducation and group acceptance and commitment therapy as psychological support strategies for informal caregivers of patients with a first psychotic episode: An experimental study. Psychosis: Psychological, Social and Integrative Approaches.[Preprint]. doi:10.1080/17522439.2022.2061041.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
World Health Organization. (2013). Mental health action plan 2013-2020. World Health Organization Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241506021
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Zentner KE, Shettell K, Abba-Aji A, Robles M. Supporting patients by family education in psychotic illness: a longitudinal pre-post study protocol. BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 24;13(10):e072881. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072881.
Reference Type
DERIVED
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro00110691
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Evaluation of Efficiency of One Day Patient/Caregiver Psychoeducation on the Caregiver's Burden
NCT05178966
RECRUITING
NA
Families Coping With Mental Illness Program
NCT00435721
UNKNOWN
PHASE1
A Treatment Engagement Protocol for Psychiatrically Hospitalized Adolescents at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis
NCT04314635
UNKNOWN
PHASE1
The Impact of a Psycho-educational Program for Family Members of Individuals With Borderline Personality Disorder
NCT06074289
COMPLETED
NA
School-Based Living In Families With Emotions Training
NCT06793878
COMPLETED
NA
Comprehensive Support for Alzheimer's Disease Caregivers
NCT00362284
COMPLETED
NA
Caregiving During Crisis
NCT04939714
COMPLETED
NA
Genetic Counselling in the Prevention of Mental Health Consequences of Cannabis Use
NCT03601026
RECRUITING
NA
Efficacy of Family Constellations in the General Population
NCT05051462
COMPLETED
NA
Altitudes for Caregivers
NCT06094647
COMPLETED
NA
Psychosocial Training for Pediatric Health Care Providers
NCT00070876
COMPLETED
NA
Effectiveness of a Multi-Component Evidence-Based Parent Training Program in Reducing Child Maltreatment
NCT00595010
COMPLETED
PHASE1
Family Intervention for Mental Illness and Substance Abuse
NCT00043693
COMPLETED
NA
Enhancing Systems of Care: Supporting Families and Improving Youth Outcomes
NCT03637478
COMPLETED
NA
Facilitating Caregiver Adaptation to Patient Institutionalization
NCT01194128
COMPLETED
PHASE3
Enhancing Consensual Social Skills to Prevent Non-consensual Sexual Acts
NCT05830643
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
An eHealth Psychosocial Intervention for Caregivers of Children With Cancer
NCT05333601
COMPLETED
NA
Intervention in Groups of Family Caregivers in Primary Health Care
NCT01177696
UNKNOWN
NA
A Feasibility Study of a Suicide Prevention Video
NCT05119946
COMPLETED
NA
mHealth for Early Psychosis Caregivers in Statewide Program Outreach
NCT07225179
RECRUITING
NA
Ensuring Quality in Psychological Support
NCT04704362
COMPLETED
NA
Early Intervention Foster Care: A Prevention Trial
NCT00701194
COMPLETED
NA
Digital Support Strategies for Caregiver Home Practice
NCT06907966
RECRUITING
NA
An Innovative Psychosocial Intervention for Adult-Child Caregivers of Parents With Alzheimer's Disease
NCT00409279
UNKNOWN
NA
Psychoeducation for Patients With Bipolar Disorder in Rwanda
NCT04671225
COMPLETED
NA