Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
15 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2022-10-04
2028-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Family Nurture Intervention in the NICU at The Valley Hospital
NCT03267043
Fluid Balance Study in Sick Neonates
NCT00962754
Inadvertent Hyperventilation During Intraoperative Care in Neonates
NCT03823716
Adolescents Born Preterm; Nurtured Beginnings
NCT00310869
Family Nurture Intervention in the NICU
NCT02710474
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Between the 1960s and the present, we have seen the emergence of medical therapies and technologies developed to treat neonates. Over this time period, there has also been a changing and growing understanding of the long-term impact that medical interventions have on the infants treated as well as on their families. Finally, the demographic characteristics of neonates have also changed as public health crises as well as the development of modern reproductive technologies led to new patient populations and new expectations of what NICUs should or should not achieve. I am interested in the ways in which these changes have led to evolving treatment criteria for neonates and ways in which neonatologists decided when to treat and when treatment was considered futile. I will interview medical professionals who are working or have worked at NICUs about the changes they experienced in their place of work over the course of their careers, the impact that medical technologies and changing patient populations had on considerations about treatment options, and the discussions they had with colleagues and the parents of patients.
There is to date no sustained historical analysis of neonatology. There are anthropological studies of the development of fetal surgery \[Casper 1998\] as well as Assisted Reproductive Technologies \[Spar, 2006; Thompson, 2005\]. There are analyses of the social history of particular medical interventions \[abortion, birth control, etc.\] \[Schoen, 1995; Schoen 2005\] and the treatment of the fetus \[Withycombe, 2019\]. And scholars have discussed the value of reproduction and the fetus as it pertains to emerging technologies of genetic testing and the history of disability \[Davis, 2019; Herzog, 2018; Lowy, 2018; Maienschein, 2003; Maienschein, 2014; Rapp, 2000; Reagan, 2010.\] This study will contribute to our understanding of the ways in which medical professionals have made decisions about life, death, and the quality of life of those being treated.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
OTHER
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Oral History Interviews
I will ask interview subjects about their educational and career path, their research interests and clinical work in the field of neonatology. I will also ask them about their personal and professional motivations and thoughts about their work. And we will discuss how their interactions with colleagues and patients/caregivers shaped their work experience and decision making.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Johanna Schoen, PhD
Professor of History
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Johanna Schoen, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johanna Schoen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rutgers University
New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Pro2021000877
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.