Validation of a Clinical Complications Scale (CCS) in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness
NCT ID: NCT06167200
Last Updated: 2025-02-06
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
42 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-05-15
2024-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This is a multi-site prospective observational study conducted in patients with Severe Acquired Brain Injury and DoC admitted to six centers of Fondazione Don Gnocchi (Italy), with clinical data collection not deviating from routine practice (except for CCS administration). The study is non-commercial and will have a maximum total duration of 24 months. It is planned to assess inter-rater agreement and concurrent validity with a similar instrument (CoCoS scale).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Behavioral Signs of Consciousness Recovery in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness (DOCSIGNS)
NCT04687397
Clinical Validity of the Minimally Conscious State "Plus" and "Minus"
NCT05954650
Neurophysiological Evaluation of Residual Cognitive Functions in Patients With Severe Alterations of Consciousness
NCT05802524
Diagnostic Accuracy of the Vegetative and Minimally Conscious State
NCT04139239
Olfactory Stimulation in Severe Brain Injury
NCT05747170
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
* assessment of inter-rater agreement;
* assessment of concurrent validity with a similar instrument (CoCoS).
This study will be implemented throutgh three phases:
(i) Identification of a group of evaluators at participating centers (n=3 per center; total n=18) and training them to administer the CCS and CoCos scales by group videoconference; (ii) Recruitment of a sample of DoC patients (n=7 per center; total n=42) who will each undergo assessment with CCS (administered twice by two independent assessors, A and B) and with CoCoS (administered by a third independent assessor, C); (iii) Evaluation of the degree of agreement between observers in administering the CCS scale (agreement between evaluators A and B) and evaluation of concurrent validity between CCS and CoCoS scale (agreement between evaluators A/B and C).
The study involves the collection of the following clinical data for each patient on admission and during the following 15 days:
* Demographic data respecting patient anonymity (patient's numeric identification code, age, sex, ethnicity, education);
* Anamnestic data (date and etiology of acute event);
* Clinical data including blood chemistry tests, clinical complications and related therapies administered as per normal clinical reports in use at enrolling units, and referring to the 15-day period following the date of enrollment. Each patient also will be evaluated with CRS-R scale 3-5 times within one week after enrollment for confirmation of the diagnosis of DoC. Assessments with CCS and CoCoS clinical scales completed on clinical reports referring to medical complications that occurred within 15 days of enrollment.
The CCS provides a record of clinical complications in 11 categories corresponding to systems of the body (metabolic abnormalities, disorders-cardiovascular, skin and musculoskeletal problems, gastrointestinal disorders, genito-urinary disorders, respiratory disorders) or categories of clinical problems frequently encountered in the population of patients with DoC (neurosurgical complications, epilepsy and myoclonus, paraosteortropathy, neurovegetative crisis, sepsis; Estraneo et al., 2018). For each category, the severity of complications is graded from 0 (absent complication) to 3 (severe complication) based on the intensity of the therapeutic intervention required, interference with the clinic, and/or frequency and duration of morbid events (an exception is the "sepsis" category for which only presence/absence is recorded). In the case of multiple clinical complications occurring within the same category, the most severe will be considered for the severity score. In this way, a cumulative scale score with range 0-31 can be derived.
Descriptive data from the sample at study entry will be expressed in terms of mean and standard deviation for quantitative variables and as frequencies for nominal variables. For the assessment of inter-rater agreement in the administration of the CCS, Fleiss' weighted K-index will be calculated on the individual subscale scores and the total score of the scale administered to each patient by two different operators. For concurrent validity testing between the CCS and CoCoS scales, Fleiss' weighted K-index will be calculated between the scores at the subscales in common between the two instruments, while Spearman's correlation coefficient for ranks will be calculated on the total scores obtained by patients on the two scales.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Patients with DoC consecutively admitted to participating units and met the inclusion criteria
Patients in VS or MCS due to severe acquired brain injury with different etiology (traumatic, anoxic, vascular) consecutively admitted at participating neurorehabilitation units. The total sample will be composed of 42 patients (n=7 pts per participating unit).
No intervention, study is observational
No intervention, study is observational
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
No intervention, study is observational
No intervention, study is observational
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Time post-injury ≥28 days;
* age ≥18 years;
* Traumatic, vascular, anoxic, or mixed etiology.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Anna Estraneo
Neurologist, Senior Researcher
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anna Estraneo, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Polo Specialistico Riabilitativo Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi ONLUS
Sant'Angelo dei Lombardi, Avellino, Italy
IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Firenze
Florence, , Italy
Polo Riabilitativo del Levante Ligure Fondazione Don Gnocchi
La Spezia, , Italy
IRCCS S. Maria Nascente Fondazione Don Gnocchi
Milan, , Italy
Istituto Palazzolo Fondazione Don Gnocchi
Milan, , Italy
Centro Spalenza Fondazione Don Gnocchi
Rovato, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Giacino JT, Ashwal S, Childs N, Cranford R, Jennett B, Katz DI, Kelly JP, Rosenberg JH, Whyte J, Zafonte RD, Zasler ND. The minimally conscious state: definition and diagnostic criteria. Neurology. 2002 Feb 12;58(3):349-53. doi: 10.1212/wnl.58.3.349.
Wannez S, Heine L, Thonnard M, Gosseries O, Laureys S; Coma Science Group collaborators. The repetition of behavioral assessments in diagnosis of disorders of consciousness. Ann Neurol. 2017 Jun;81(6):883-889. doi: 10.1002/ana.24962.
Pistoia F, Carolei A, Bodien YG, Greenfield S, Kaplan S, Sacco S, Pistarini C, Casalena A, De Tanti A, Cazzulani B, Bellaviti G, Sara M, Giacino J. The Comorbidities Coma Scale (CoCoS): Psychometric Properties and Clinical Usefulness in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness. Front Neurol. 2019 Oct 17;10:1042. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01042. eCollection 2019.
Estraneo A, Loreto V, Masotta O, Pascarella A, Trojano L. Do Medical Complications Impact Long-Term Outcomes in Prolonged Disorders of Consciousness? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Dec;99(12):2523-2531.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.04.024. Epub 2018 May 26.
Giacino JT, Kalmar K, Whyte J. The JFK Coma Recovery Scale-Revised: measurement characteristics and diagnostic utility. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Dec;85(12):2020-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.02.033.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SCC_DOC
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.