Validity of Web-Based OSDI-6 Questionnaire in a Chinese Adult Population

NCT ID: NCT06158906

Last Updated: 2024-02-20

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: COMPLETED
• Total Enrollment: 270 participants
• Study Classification: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2023-12-01
• Study Completion Date: 2024-02-17

Brief Summary

This study aimed to evaluate the validity of the Chinese translation version of OSDI-6 (C-OSDI-6) in a theoretical set-up of two questionnaire groups for dry eye

Detailed Description

Screening for dry eye symptoms and quantifying dry eye symptoms aids in assessment, diagnosis, and treatment. Patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments such as the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI-12) are utilized for assessing patients' subjective experiences and functional abilities. The OSDI-12 comprises of 12-item and is often used in conjunction with other tests in clinical settings to assess individuals with DE. Created in 1997, the original OSDI consisted of 12 items and was designed to evaluate subjective dry eye symptoms and the consequences of DED on vision-related activities of daily life over the preceding week. The 12 items are grouped into three subscales: ocular symptoms (three items), vision-related functions (six items), and environmental triggers (three items). While the original version of the OSDI-12 questionnaire was created in English and was later translated and validated into other languages, it should be used carefully since the cutoff values vary among various languages (27.2 points for the Chinese version and 36.3 points for the Japanese version) . Recent research using Rasch analysis found that separating answer items into four categories by merging "half of the time" and "most of the time" might lead to higher thresholds and better intervals in each category. The OSDI-12 total score is calculated using the formula: [(sum of scores for all questions answered) × 100]/ [(total number of questions answered) × 4]. Ocular Surface Disease Index-6 (OSDI-6) is a derivative and shortened version of the original OSDI-12 and can potentially improve efficiency in a busy clinical setting.

Conditions

Dry Eye

Study Design

• Observational Model Type: OTHER
• Study Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Study group

Dry eye patients were recruited to fill in the questionnaire

No interventions assigned to this group

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Diagnosed dry eye
• Able and willing to comply with the schedule
• Able to read and understand the C-OSDI-12 questionnaire independently

Exclusion Criteria

• The researchers judged to be not suitable

• Minimum Eligible Age: 18 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 70 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

He Eye Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Locations

He Eye Hospital

Shenyang, None Selected, China

Countries

China

References

Jones L, Downie LE, Korb D, Benitez-Del-Castillo JM, Dana R, Deng SX, Dong PN, Geerling G, Hida RY, Liu Y, Seo KY, Tauber J, Wakamatsu TH, Xu J, Wolffsohn JS, Craig JP. TFOS DEWS II Management and Therapy Report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):575-628. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 28736343 (View on PubMed)

Craig JP, Nichols KK, Akpek EK, Caffery B, Dua HS, Joo CK, Liu Z, Nelson JD, Nichols JJ, Tsubota K, Stapleton F. TFOS DEWS II Definition and Classification Report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):276-283. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.008. Epub 2017 Jul 20.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 28736335 (View on PubMed)

Schiffman RM, Christianson MD, Jacobsen G, Hirsch JD, Reis BL. Reliability and validity of the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Arch Ophthalmol. 2000 May;118(5):615-21. doi: 10.1001/archopht.118.5.615.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 10815152 (View on PubMed)

Nichols KK, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K. Performance and repeatability of the NEI-VFQ-25 in patients with dry eye. Cornea. 2002 Aug;21(6):578-83. doi: 10.1097/00003226-200208000-00009.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 12131034 (View on PubMed)

Lu F, Tao A, Hu Y, Tao W, Lu P. Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of Three Common Dry Eye Questionnaires in Chinese. J Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug 27;2018:2401213. doi: 10.1155/2018/2401213. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 30225139 (View on PubMed)

Midorikawa-Inomata A, Inomata T, Nojiri S, Nakamura M, Iwagami M, Fujimoto K, Okumura Y, Iwata N, Eguchi A, Hasegawa H, Kinouchi H, Murakami A, Kobayashi H. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Ocular Surface Disease Index for dry eye disease. BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 25;9(11):e033940. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033940.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 31772113 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

OSDI6

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id