GCS Survey: "GHB IN CHEMICAL SUBMISSION: MYTH OR REALITY?"

NCT ID: NCT06137599

Last Updated: 2024-07-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

200 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-03-20

Study Completion Date

2026-03-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

According to the media, GHB is the main substance used for chemical submission. The national survey conducted by the Addictovigilance centre of Paris on drug-facilitated assaults shows that GHB is used, but only in a very small proportion of cases. However, the short detection times for this substance point to its possible under-detection (06-09h in blood, 10-12h in urine). A pilot research protocol in Ile de France focusing on capillary analysis is therefore being proposed to volunteer victims to overcome this bias and answer this question: is the massive use of GHB in chemical submission a myth or a reality?

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The Addictovigilance center of Paris (CEIP-A) has been responsible for the national chemical submission survey under the supervision of the French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM) since 2003, using data from expert toxicology laboratories, forensic police and forensic medicine departments. With 20 years' experience in the criminal use of substances, the center draws up an annual report on substance-facilitated assaults in order to put in place appropriate, up-to-date prevention measures.

In 2021, the #balancetonbar movement emerged in Brussels and spread like a shockwave across Belgian cities and Europe. On Instagram, women spoke out about the extent of drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA) in nightclubs and denounced the " laissez faire " attitude of the political authorities. The movement is resonating in France and getting louder : #balancetonbar has now been joined by #MetooGHB, which puts the so-called "rape drug" in the spotlight. But what's really going on?

A retrospective study of the national survey data from 2010 to 2019 reports only 26 chemical submissions (CS) attributable to GHB/GBL out of 617 CS identified (4.2%) among 4349 suspected cases. However, this study highlights all the limits to the disclosure of GHB (low proportion of complaints filed, speed of elimination of this substance from the usual matrices, insufficient number of court orders for hair analysis).

With the aim to eliminate the limitations identified as far as possible and answer the question "Is the massive use of GHB in chemical submission a myth or a reality?", a pilot research protocol, centred on capillary analysis, is being proposed to 200 victims in the Ile de France region.

This is a non-interventional, multi-centre, category 3 study, the only acts (hair sampling) or procedures (chemical submission declaration form) are risk-free and do not affect the management of participants.

Victims are included whether or not they have lodged a complaint, in collaboration with forensic medicine departments, HIV and STI screening Center and Victim Support Associations. Referred to the parisien CEIP-A, 3 strands of hair are sampled after an interview in which the victim's history and voluntary drug use data were taken. A pre-analytical treatment of the hair (washing, fragmentation), followed by detection by high-resolution mass spectrometry is carried out by an expert laboratory in search of GHB and other known chemical submission agents (illicit drugs and psychoactive medicines).

To meet our objective, a comparative study of the results of the GCS protocol and the survey history was carried out using an exact binomial test. This study will also provide an opportunity for a more general discussion of the value of hair analysis in the detection of chemical submission agents.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

CHEMICAL SUBMISSION

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Capillary analysis

Samples taken between 2 and 6 months after the presumed events. A pre-analytical treatment of the hair (washing, fragmentation), followed by detection by high-resolution mass spectrometry is carried out by an expert laboratory to search for both GHB and psychoactive drugs.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Victims over the age of majority (≥ 18 years) on the day of the alleged events
* With a medical history leading to the suspicion of chemical submission:
* Presence of evocative clinical signs (amnesia and/or behavioural disorders and/or neurological disorders and/or other somatic disorders, etc.) AND
* In the presence of potential criminal acts (suspected or proven assault or attempted assault).
* French speaking
* Having been informed of the search

Exclusion Criteria

* \- Victims who were minors (\<18 years) on the day of the alleged events.
* Victims who usually use GHB/GBL recreationally.
* Suspecting administration of a harmful substance with no crime or offence committed at the time and no attempted assault
* Victims of needle spiking
* Victims with very short hair (\<3 cm), bald or shaven heads
* Victims who have exceeded the maximum time limit for taking a hair sample (6 months after the event)
* Do not speak French
* Oppose to participating in the study
* Victims presenting a psychotic or cognitive syndrome likely to impair judgement Victims placed under guardianship or legal protection (article L11-22-2 CSP)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mission Interministérielle de Lutte contre les Drogues et les Conduites Addictives - MILDECA

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Leïla CHAOUACHI, PharmD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

APHP(ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE DES HOPITAUX DE PARIS

Anne Batisse, PharmD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

APHP(ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE DES HOPITAUX DE PARIS

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Laetitia LASNE

Bondy, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Elisabeth ALCARAZ

Paris, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Leila CHAOUACHI

Paris, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Leïla CHAOUACHI, PharmD

Role: CONTACT

01 40 05 42 70 ext. +33

Anne Batisse, PharmD

Role: CONTACT

01 40 05 42 65 ext. +33

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Laetitia LASNE, MD

Role: primary

Elisabeth ALCARAZ, MD

Role: primary

Leila CHAOUACHI, PharmD

Role: primary

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

APHP230579

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Divided Drug Delivery
NCT02869724 UNKNOWN NA
The Effects of ∆-9-THC and Naloxone in Humans
NCT01591629 COMPLETED EARLY_PHASE1