GCS Survey: "GHB IN CHEMICAL SUBMISSION: MYTH OR REALITY?"
NCT ID: NCT06137599
Last Updated: 2024-07-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2024-03-20
2026-03-20
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
New Psychoactive Substances in Intoxicated Patients During the Winter Activities
NCT04155281
Substance Use Disorder in Chemsex Practice
NCT06476873
GHB Poisoning and Poisoning Induced by Others
NCT03651778
Effectiveness of tDCS on Reducing Craving in Patients Practicing Chemsex: a Single-center, Double-blind, Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial
NCT05945199
Dose-response of Cannabis and Driving
NCT03656029
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In 2021, the #balancetonbar movement emerged in Brussels and spread like a shockwave across Belgian cities and Europe. On Instagram, women spoke out about the extent of drug-facilitated sexual assault (DFSA) in nightclubs and denounced the " laissez faire " attitude of the political authorities. The movement is resonating in France and getting louder : #balancetonbar has now been joined by #MetooGHB, which puts the so-called "rape drug" in the spotlight. But what's really going on?
A retrospective study of the national survey data from 2010 to 2019 reports only 26 chemical submissions (CS) attributable to GHB/GBL out of 617 CS identified (4.2%) among 4349 suspected cases. However, this study highlights all the limits to the disclosure of GHB (low proportion of complaints filed, speed of elimination of this substance from the usual matrices, insufficient number of court orders for hair analysis).
With the aim to eliminate the limitations identified as far as possible and answer the question "Is the massive use of GHB in chemical submission a myth or a reality?", a pilot research protocol, centred on capillary analysis, is being proposed to 200 victims in the Ile de France region.
This is a non-interventional, multi-centre, category 3 study, the only acts (hair sampling) or procedures (chemical submission declaration form) are risk-free and do not affect the management of participants.
Victims are included whether or not they have lodged a complaint, in collaboration with forensic medicine departments, HIV and STI screening Center and Victim Support Associations. Referred to the parisien CEIP-A, 3 strands of hair are sampled after an interview in which the victim's history and voluntary drug use data were taken. A pre-analytical treatment of the hair (washing, fragmentation), followed by detection by high-resolution mass spectrometry is carried out by an expert laboratory in search of GHB and other known chemical submission agents (illicit drugs and psychoactive medicines).
To meet our objective, a comparative study of the results of the GCS protocol and the survey history was carried out using an exact binomial test. This study will also provide an opportunity for a more general discussion of the value of hair analysis in the detection of chemical submission agents.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Capillary analysis
Samples taken between 2 and 6 months after the presumed events. A pre-analytical treatment of the hair (washing, fragmentation), followed by detection by high-resolution mass spectrometry is carried out by an expert laboratory to search for both GHB and psychoactive drugs.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* With a medical history leading to the suspicion of chemical submission:
* Presence of evocative clinical signs (amnesia and/or behavioural disorders and/or neurological disorders and/or other somatic disorders, etc.) AND
* In the presence of potential criminal acts (suspected or proven assault or attempted assault).
* French speaking
* Having been informed of the search
Exclusion Criteria
* Victims who usually use GHB/GBL recreationally.
* Suspecting administration of a harmful substance with no crime or offence committed at the time and no attempted assault
* Victims of needle spiking
* Victims with very short hair (\<3 cm), bald or shaven heads
* Victims who have exceeded the maximum time limit for taking a hair sample (6 months after the event)
* Do not speak French
* Oppose to participating in the study
* Victims presenting a psychotic or cognitive syndrome likely to impair judgement Victims placed under guardianship or legal protection (article L11-22-2 CSP)
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mission Interministérielle de Lutte contre les Drogues et les Conduites Addictives - MILDECA
UNKNOWN
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Leïla CHAOUACHI, PharmD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
APHP(ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE DES HOPITAUX DE PARIS
Anne Batisse, PharmD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
APHP(ASSISTANCE PUBLIQUE DES HOPITAUX DE PARIS
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Laetitia LASNE
Bondy, , France
Elisabeth ALCARAZ
Paris, , France
Leila CHAOUACHI
Paris, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Laetitia LASNE, MD
Role: primary
Elisabeth ALCARAZ, MD
Role: primary
Leila CHAOUACHI, PharmD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
APHP230579
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.