Automated Carbon Dioxide Angiography in Fenestrated/Branched Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
NCT ID: NCT06103942
Last Updated: 2023-10-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-11-01
2025-11-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Now, with the availability of an automated CO2 injector system (Angiodroid Srl, Italy) and the improvement in image acquisition protocols, CO2 angiography is increasingly used for vascular imaging and endovascular procedures.
Fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR) for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) is nowadays considered the treatment of first choice, due to its reduced procedure-related morbidity and mortality, when compared to open repair.
A peculiarity of these procedures is the need of high volumes of contrast media, which are not needed in case of open repair. This increases the related risk of impaired kidney function at the short- and long-term.
The present study will specifically examine the safety of the use of CO2 as intra-arterial contrast agent using the Angiodroid automated CO2-injection system during F/B-EVAR procedures. Furthermore, the current study will focus on image quality during the different steps of the procedure with the aim of standardize injection parameters (volume and pressure) for the detection of the ostium of the visceral vessels as well as of the iliac arteries, all defined as target vessels.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Optimizing CO2 Injection Technique for EVAR
NCT05304026
An Innovative Approach to Automated Carbon Dioxide Angiography During Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
NCT04721951
Carbon Dioxide Guided Angiography in Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
NCT04444999
The Use of Carbon Dioxide as a Contrast Media for Performing Endovascular Procedures
NCT01861327
CO2 Automated Angiographies With Fusion Imaging for Zero- or Near Zero- Contrast FEVAR.
NCT06337890
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Carbon dioxide is an effective and low-risk alternative to ICM, which is nowadays used in endovascular procedures, thanks to its unique properties, such as no risk for nephrotoxicity or allergic reaction. For many years, the two most important restrictions for this technique consisted of: 1) the absence of a delivery system that could minimize the risk of air contamination during the CO2 angiography and allow controlled injection (in terms of pressure and volume of injection) of the CO2 and 2) the absence of a customized imaging protocol for a better visualization of CO2 during DSA acquisition.
Now, with the availability of an automated CO2 injector system (Angiodroid Srl, Italy) and the improvement in image acquisition protocols, CO2 angiography is increasingly used for vascular imaging and endovascular procedures.
Fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (F/B-EVAR) for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) is nowadays considered the treatment of first choice, due to its reduced procedure-related morbidity and mortality, when compared to open repair.
A peculiarity of these procedures is the need of high volumes of contrast media, which are not needed in case of open repair. This increases the related risk of impaired kidney function at the short- and long-term.
The literature on CO2 angiography still lacks on studies regarding the systematic use of the technique in F/B-EVAR procedures.
The present study will specifically examine the safety of the use of CO2 as intra-arterial contrast agent using the Angiodroid automated CO2-injection system during F/B-EVAR procedures. Furthermore, the current study will focus on image quality during the different steps of the procedure with the aim of standardize injection parameters (volume and pressure) for the detection of the ostium of the visceral vessels as well as of the iliac arteries, all defined as target vessels.
The main study hypothesis is that the automated standardized injection of CO2 could provide the same angiographic information and image quality as ICM, which is nowadays used as standard contrast agent in endovascular procedures.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CO2 angiography
A supplemental CO2 angiography will be performed before and after the stent graft placement.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Provided informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Known atrium- or ventricular septal defect with right-left-shunt
* Current participation in other interventional studies
18 Years
95 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Uppsala University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Giuseppe Asciutto, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Uppsala University
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rolland Y, Duvauferrier R, Lucas A, Gourlay C, Morcet N, Rambeau M, Chaperon J. Lower limb angiography: a prospective study comparing carbon dioxide with iodinated contrast material in 30 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Aug;171(2):333-7. doi: 10.2214/ajr.171.2.9694446.
Palena LM, Diaz-Sandoval LJ, Candeo A, Brigato C, Sultato E, Manzi M. Automated Carbon Dioxide Angiography for the Evaluation and Endovascular Treatment of Diabetic Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia. J Endovasc Ther. 2016 Feb;23(1):40-8. doi: 10.1177/1526602815616924. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
Scalise F, Novelli E, Auguadro C, Casali V, Manfredi M, Zannoli R. Automated carbon dioxide digital angiography for lower-limb arterial disease evaluation: safety assessment and comparison with standard iodinated contrast media angiography. J Invasive Cardiol. 2015 Jan;27(1):20-6.
Seeger JM, Self S, Harward TR, Flynn TC, Hawkins IF Jr. Carbon dioxide gas as an arterial contrast agent. Ann Surg. 1993 Jun;217(6):688-97; discussion 697-8. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199306000-00011.
Caridi JG, Hawkins IF Jr. CO2 digital subtraction angiography: potential complications and their prevention. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997 May-Jun;8(3):383-91. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(97)70577-3. No abstract available.
Bettmann MA, D'Agostino R, Juravsky LI, Jeffery RF, Tottle A, Goudey CP. Carbon dioxide as an angiographic contrast agent. A prospective randomized trial. Invest Radiol. 1994 Jun;29 Suppl 2:S45-6. doi: 10.1097/00004424-199406001-00016. No abstract available.
Hawkins IF Jr, Wilcox CS, Kerns SR, Sabatelli FW. CO2 digital angiography: a safer contrast agent for renal vascular imaging? Am J Kidney Dis. 1994 Oct;24(4):685-94. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(12)80232-0.
D'Oria M, Wanhainen A, Lindstrom D, Tegler G, Mani K. Editor's Choice - Pre-Operative Moderate to Severe Chronic Kidney Disease is Associated with Worse Short-Term and Mid-Term Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Fenestrated-Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Dec;62(6):859-868. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.08.033. Epub 2021 Oct 27.
Gallitto E, Faggioli G, Vacirca A, Pini R, Mascoli C, Fenelli C, Logiacco A, Abualhin M, Gargiulo M. The benefit of combined carbon dioxide automated angiography and fusion imaging in preserving perioperative renal function in fenestrated endografting. J Vasc Surg. 2020 Dec;72(6):1906-1916. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.02.051. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
Chisci E, Michelagnoli S, Masciello F, Turini F, Panci S, Troisi N. Benefits and Role of Carbon Dioxide Angiography in Case of Misalignment Between Fenestration and Target Vessel During Fenestrated Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2022 Feb;29(1):7-10. doi: 10.1177/15266028211032955. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
Geisbusch S, Kuehnl A, Salvermoser M, Reutersberg B, Trenner M, Eckstein HH. Editor's Choice - Hospital Incidence, Treatment, and In Hospital Mortality Following Open and Endovascular Surgery for Thoraco-abdominal Aortic Aneurysms in Germany from 2005 to 2014: Secondary Data Analysis of the Nationwide German DRG Microdata. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019 Apr;57(4):488-498. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2018.10.030. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
de Lachomette MF, Della N, Maucort-Boulch D, Duprey A, Rosset E, Feugier P, Lermusiaux P, Albertini JN, Millon A. Renal Function after Fenestrated or Branched Endovascular Aortic Repair: The Early Impairment Predictive Factors. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017 Apr;40:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2016.06.014. Epub 2016 Aug 27.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Nov2023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.