Hospital Implementation of a Stroke Protocol for Emergency Evaluation and Disposition

NCT ID: NCT06094478

Last Updated: 2025-08-22

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

900 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-17

Study Completion Date

2028-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Most stroke patients are initially evaluated at the closest hospital but some need to be transferred to a hospital that can provide more advanced care. The "Door-In-Door-Out" (DIDO) process at the first hospital can take time making transferred patients no longer able to get the advanced treatments. This study will help hospitals across the US "stand up" new ways to evaluate stroke patients, decide who needs to be transferred, and transfer them quickly for advanced treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Nearly 800,000 people in the United States (US) each year experience acute stroke, which remains the leading cause of adult disability and 5th leading cause of death. Despite the proliferation of stroke centers nationwide, almost half of the US population lives beyond a 60-minute drive of a comprehensive stroke center (CSC) and many patients require inter-hospital transfer (IHT) from a non-CSC to a CSC. Building upon prior work to reduce door-in-door-out (DIDO) time at referring hospitals, this proposal entitled "Hospital Implementation of a Stroke Protocol for Emergency Evaluation and Disposition (HI-SPEED)" study seeks to (1) implement a novel, evidence-based, multi-component DIDO intervention in eight diverse stroke systems of care across multiple regions of the US and (2) conduct a dual evaluation of its effectiveness in reducing median DIDO time (primary outcome) and disability (secondary outcome) and of the fidelity and quality of implementation. The HI-SPEED study will definitively establish the effectiveness and generalizability of a multi-component evidence-based DIDO intervention and provide information about contextual adaptations for high-quality implementation and widespread dissemination. This study benefits from our well-established interdisciplinary expertise in stroke, emergency and prehospital medicine, systems and quality engineering, health services research, and strong multicenter research collaborations. Findings from HI-SPEED will have substantial implications for a wide range of hospitals and stroke systems of care worldwide.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Stroke, Acute Ischemic Stroke, Acute Hemorrhagic Stroke

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

This study is a multicenter, prospective cluster-randomized, controlled study designed to establish the effectiveness of a multi-component DIDO intervention, the HI-SPEED Protocol, to reduce the median DIDO time for acute ischemic stroke (primary outcome) and for hemorrhagic stroke (secondary outcome) and increase the proportion of acute ischemic stroke patients with good functional outcomes after endovascular therapy (secondary outcome), defined as a 3-month modified Rankin Score of 0-2.
Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Control Phase

Pre-implementation of HI-SPEED Protocol

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Implementation Phase

Post-Implementation of HI-SPEED Protocol

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

HI-SPEED Protocol

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The HI-SPEED Protocol or Bundle consists of 7 components including 1) stroke screening scales, 2) imaging pathways, 3) telestroke operations, 4) a best practice alert, 5) stroke team communication tool, 6) door-to-needle (thrombolysis) treatment pathway, and 7) a standardized hand-off tool. This protocol will be implemented at each participating health system in clusters of 2 health systems.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HI-SPEED Protocol

The HI-SPEED Protocol or Bundle consists of 7 components including 1) stroke screening scales, 2) imaging pathways, 3) telestroke operations, 4) a best practice alert, 5) stroke team communication tool, 6) door-to-needle (thrombolysis) treatment pathway, and 7) a standardized hand-off tool. This protocol will be implemented at each participating health system in clusters of 2 health systems.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

HI-SPEED Bundle

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age \>=18 years
* Final diagnosis: AIS, ICH, or SAH

Exclusion Criteria

* Final diagnosis: TIA or stroke NOS
* Age \<18 years
* Comfort care measures on day 0 or 1
* Left hospital against medical advice
* Enrolled in clinical trial related to stroke that is competing with this study
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Miami

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Yale University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Cincinnati

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Weill Medical College of Cornell University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Utah

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Emory University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Michigan

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Chicago

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Shyam Prabhakaran, MD, MS

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Chicago

Jane Holl, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Chicago

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Yale New Haven Hospital

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Jackson Memorial Hospital

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Emory University Hospital

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

UChicago Medicine Ingalls Memorial Hospital

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

New York Presbyterian - Weill Cornell Hospital

New York, New York, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

University of Cincinnati Medical Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

University of Utah Health

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Shyam Prabhakaran, MD, MS

Role: CONTACT

773-702-0080

Jane L Holl, MD, MPH

Role: CONTACT

773-702-8186

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Joseph Schindler, MD

Role: primary

203-737-1057

Gillian Gordon Perue, MD

Role: primary

786-466-1380

Fadi Nahab, MD

Role: primary

Lakshmi Warrior, MD

Role: primary

203-737-1057

Ava L Liberman, MD

Role: primary

Christopher T Richards, MD, MS

Role: primary

513-585-8962

Lee S Chung, MD

Role: primary

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Anderson CS, Chalmers J, Stapf C. Blood-pressure lowering in acute intracerebral hemorrhage. N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 26;369(13):1274-5. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1309586. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24066751 (View on PubMed)

Richards CT, Holl JL, Khorzad R, Prabhakaran S. Abstract TMP70: Simulation Modeling Predicts Actual Patient Transport Rates Following the Implementation of a Prehospital Comprehensive Stroke Center DirectTransport Protocol. Stroke. 2020;51(Suppl_1):ATMP70-ATMP70.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Menon BK, Saver JL, Goyal M, Nogueira R, Prabhakaran S, Liang L, Xian Y, Hernandez AF, Fonarow GC, Schwamm L, Smith EE. Trends in endovascular therapy and clinical outcomes within the nationwide Get With The Guidelines-Stroke registry. Stroke. 2015 Apr;46(4):989-95. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007542. Epub 2015 Feb 13.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25681065 (View on PubMed)

Saver JL, Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Reeves MJ, Grau-Sepulveda MV, Pan W, Olson DM, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Schwamm LH. Time to treatment with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator and outcome from acute ischemic stroke. JAMA. 2013 Jun 19;309(23):2480-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.6959.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23780461 (View on PubMed)

Mendelson SJ, Aggarwal NT, Richards C, O'Neill K, Holl JL, Prabhakaran S. Racial disparities in refusal of stroke thrombolysis in Chicago. Neurology. 2018 Jan 30;90(5):e359-e364. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004905. Epub 2018 Jan 3.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29298854 (View on PubMed)

Curran GM, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne JM, Stetler C. Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012 Mar;50(3):217-26. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22310560 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1U01NS131797-01

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

IRB22-1932

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.