Stroke DOC Arizona TIME - Stroke Team Remote Evaluation Using a Digital Observation Camera
NCT ID: NCT00623350
Last Updated: 2011-05-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2007-12-31
2009-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Study aims (1) to determine the impact of a site-independent, remote, telemedicine consultation system on decision making in the Emergency Department, regarding the decision to treat or not to treat with thrombolytics; (2) to assess the numbers of patients who receive thrombolytics and the time to treatment in patients evaluated by telemedicine versus telephone only; (3) to assess the appropriateness of thrombolytic treatment decisions in telemedicine versus telephone-only consultations; and (4) to assess the completeness of the data collection in telemedicine versus telephone-only consultations.
60 patients in Arizona with acute presentation of stroke symptoms, per bedside practitioner discretion (onset generally less than 12 hours and likely less than 3 hours)
Two arms: Video Camera/Telemedicine (Intervention n = 30) and No Video Camera/Telephone only (Control n = 30)
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Stroke Team Remote Evaluation Using a Digital Observation Camera- Long Term Outcomes(STRokE DOC-LTO)
NCT00936455
Stroke Team Remote Evaluation Using a Digital Observation Camera
NCT00283868
Stroke Therapy, Education, Prevention: Telemedicine Outpatient Initiative Trial
NCT01875328
Tele-Stroke: Prehospital Identification of Patients With Suspected Stroke Using Onsite Mobile Telemedicine - Feasibility
NCT03370094
Telestroke 2: Prehospital Triage of Patients With Suspected Stroke Using Onsite Mobile Telemedicine
NCT04578002
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Noninvasive prospective multi-center study of an interactive 2-way, wireless or site-independent, audiovisual telemedicine system designed for real-time remote examination of acute stroke symptoms and deficits as a basis for treatment consultation and recommendation.
Study aims (1) to determine the impact of a site-independent, remote, telemedicine consultation system on decision making in the Emergency Department, regarding the decision to treat or not to treat with thrombolytics; (2) to assess the numbers of patients who receive thrombolytics and the time to treatment in patients evaluated by telemedicine versus telephone only; (3) to assess the appropriateness of thrombolytic treatment decisions in telemedicine versus telephone-only consultations; and (4) to assess the completeness of the data collection in telemedicine versus telephone-only consultations.
60 patients in Arizona with acute presentation of stroke symptoms, per bedside practitioner discretion (onset generally less than 12 hours and likely less than 3 hours)
Two arms: Video Camera/Telemedicine (Intervention n = 30) and No Video Camera/Telephone only (Control n = 30)
Assessments
All cases will undergo the following assessments:
Patient-Level Visits
Baseline: Pre-stroke Modified Rankin Scale (demographics), pre-treatment Modified Rankin Scale, medications during prior 3 days, physical exam and vital signs, NIHSS, Modified NIHSS, EKG, screening labs, and head CT scan
Treatment: Treatment times, thrombolytic safety outcome, and recanalization treatment
Day 90: Modified Rankin Scale, Barthel Index, and mortality
End of Study: End of study/Termination
Meta-Level Reviews
Adjudication: Post case completion, review and evaluation of each remote consultation on whether the recommendation for or against thrombolytic therapy was appropriate, given the information presented at each of 3 levels of adjudication.
Central Read: Post case completion, review and evaluation of each Baseline head CT scan interpretation on whether there was a CT contraindication to thrombolytic therapy.
Trial Groups
There will be two trial groups in this study. The investigators hypothesized (based upon sample size calculations) that the correct treatment will be recommended at rates of 80% (telephone) and 90% (full telemedicine).
Target Population
60 AZ patients will be randomized to either telephone-only or video telemedicine consultation. Appropriateness of therapeutic decision-making, numbers treated, time to treatment, and completeness of data collection will be evaluated and compared for each group.
If the protocol or grant application is investigator-initiated, a 200-word (or less) abstract of the proposed protocol or grant application must be included (an abstract included in an NIH or other submission is acceptable). If the protocol is sponsor initiated, a summary written by the Mayo investigator must be included. Summary should include: 1) Hypothesis, 2) Basic study plan, 3) Statistical method/rationale, 4) Scientific basis or justification, 5) Inclusion/exclusion criteria, and 6) Monetary consideration. You may type or cut and paste from an existing document to address this question
Objectives
1. to determine the impact of a site-independent, remote, telemedicine consultation system on decision making in the Emergency Department, regarding the decision to treat or not to treat with thrombolytics;
2. to assess the numbers of patients who receive thrombolytics and the time to treatment in patients evaluated by telemedicine versus telephone only;
3. to assess the appropriateness of thrombolytic treatment decisions in telemedicine versus telephone-only consultations; and
4. to assess the completeness of the data collection in telemedicine versus telephone-only consultations.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
1
Acute Stroke Telephone consult for the decision of tPA within 3 hours of symptoms onset.
Telephone
Acute Stroke consult by Telephone for the decision of tPA within 3 hours of symptom onset.
2
Acute Stroke consult via audio video telemedicine for the decision of tPA within 3 hours of symptom onset.
Two way audio/video telemedicine consult
Acute Stroke consult by two way audio video telemedicine for the decision of tPA within 3 hours of symptom onset.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Telephone
Acute Stroke consult by Telephone for the decision of tPA within 3 hours of symptom onset.
Two way audio/video telemedicine consult
Acute Stroke consult by two way audio video telemedicine for the decision of tPA within 3 hours of symptom onset.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Written Informed Consent
* Eighteen years of age or older
* Symptoms consistent with acute stroke (ischemic or hemorrhagic)
* Acute presentation of stroke symptoms, per bedside physician discretion (onset generally less than 12 hours and likely less than 3 hours)
Exclusion Criteria
* Unlikely to complete study through 90-day follow-up
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Arizona Department of Health Services
OTHER_GOV
Yuma Regional Medical Center
OTHER
Kingman Regional Medical Center
OTHER
University of California, San Diego
OTHER
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mayo Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Demaerschalk BM, Bobrow BJ, Raman R, Kiernan TE, Aguilar MI, Ingall TJ, Dodick DW, Ward MP, Richemont PC, Brazdys K, Koch TC, Miley ML, Hoffman Snyder CR, Corday DA, Meyer BC; STRokE DOC AZ TIME Investigators. Stroke team remote evaluation using a digital observation camera in Arizona: the initial mayo clinic experience trial. Stroke. 2010 Jun;41(6):1251-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.574509. Epub 2010 Apr 29.
Demaerschalk BM, Bobrow BJ, Raman R, Ernstrom K, Hoxworth JM, Patel AC, Kiernan TE, Aguilar MI, Ingall TJ, Dodick DW, Meyer BC; Stroke Team Remote Evaluation Using a Digital Observation Camera (STRokE DOC) in Arizona-The Initial Mayo Clinic Experience (AZ TIME) Investigators. CT interpretation in a telestroke network: agreement among a spoke radiologist, hub vascular neurologist, and hub neuroradiologist. Stroke. 2012 Nov;43(11):3095-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.666255. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
Demaerschalk BM, Raman R, Ernstrom K, Meyer BC. Efficacy of telemedicine for stroke: pooled analysis of the Stroke Team Remote Evaluation Using a Digital Observation Camera (STRokE DOC) and STRokE DOC Arizona telestroke trials. Telemed J E Health. 2012 Apr;18(3):230-7. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0116. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
Miley ML, Demaerschalk BM, Olmstead NL, Kiernan TE, Corday DA, Chikani V, Bobrow BJ. The state of emergency stroke resources and care in rural Arizona: a platform for telemedicine. Telemed J E Health. 2009 Sep;15(7):691-9. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0018.
Capampangan DJ, Wellik KE, Bobrow BJ, Aguilar MI, Ingall TJ, Kiernan TE, Wingerchuk DM, Demaerschalk BM. Telemedicine versus telephone for remote emergency stroke consultations: a critically appraised topic. Neurologist. 2009 May;15(3):163-6. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e3181a4b79c.
Demaerschalk BM, Miley ML, Kiernan TE, Bobrow BJ, Corday DA, Wellik KE, Aguilar MI, Ingall TJ, Dodick DW, Brazdys K, Koch TC, Ward MP, Richemont PC; STARR Coinvestigators. Stroke telemedicine. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009;84(1):53-64. doi: 10.4065/84.1.53.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
06-005731
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.