Application of Unilateral Epidural Anesthesia in Older Patients With Hip Fracture

NCT ID: NCT06093412

Last Updated: 2023-10-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

106 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-01

Study Completion Date

2021-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Because of population ageing, fragility fractures have become a huge burden on healthcare systems and wider society. Fractures result in a sharp drop in both short-term and long-term quality of life, they have a strong influence on activities of daily living and mobility, and they are associated with a significant increase in 1-year mortality (18%-36%). Surgery can benefit elderly patients with hip fractures to an extent, but it entails inevitable risks, particularly with respect to general anesthesia. In recent years unilateral spinal anesthesia has attracted attention due to the advantages of hemodynamic stability, reduced anesthetic dosage, and sufficient sensory block.

On the basis of a previous study, in the current study anesthetics were directly implanted into the unilateral epidural space in elderly patients with hip fractures prior to the completion of surgery. Data from 106 patients with old hip fractures who had undergone surgical treatment incorporating unilateral epidural anesthesia (UEA) or combined lumbar and epidural anesthesia were retrospectively analyzed in an attempt to provide a feasible solution for this kind of patients' anesthesia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Surgery can benefit elderly patients with hip fractures to an extent, but it entails inevitable risks, particularly with respect to general anesthesia. In recent years unilateral spinal anesthesia has attracted attention due to the advantages of hemodynamic stability, reduced anesthetic dosage, and sufficient sensory block. On the basis of a previous study, in the current study anesthetics were directly implanted into the unilateral epidural space in elderly patients with hip fractures prior to the completion of surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Anesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

unilateral epidural anesthesia (UEA) group

Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of anesthesia they received; a UEA group (n = 42) and a combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSEA) group (n = 64).

unilateral epidural anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The patients received unilateral epidural anesthesia

combined lumbar and epidural anesthesia (CSEA) group

Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of anesthesia they received; a UEA group (n = 42) and a combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSEA) group (n = 64).

combined lumbar and epidural anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The patients received combined lumbar and epidural anesthesia

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

unilateral epidural anesthesia

The patients received unilateral epidural anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

combined lumbar and epidural anesthesia

The patients received combined lumbar and epidural anesthesia

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

had a fracture of a proximal femur were aged \> 65 years the fracture occurred within 2 weeks of receiving treatment with comorbidities including pulmonary disease, arrhythmia, senile valve disease or lacunar infarction underwent intraspinal anesthesia during surgery

Exclusion Criteria

had a secondary fracture after endoprosthetic reconstruction or intramedullary nail had a pathological fracture caused by tumor or tuberculosis condition was accompanied by lower limb nerve dysfunction had a cognitive or psychiatric disorder coagulation disorders hospitalization data were incomplete.
Minimum Eligible Age

66 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

94 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Peng Liu

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Overall Study Officials Zhao, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital

Chengdu, Sichuan, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Prestmo A, Hagen G, Sletvold O, Helbostad JL, Thingstad P, Taraldsen K, Lydersen S, Halsteinli V, Saltnes T, Lamb SE, Johnsen LG, Saltvedt I. Comprehensive geriatric care for patients with hip fractures: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Apr 25;385(9978):1623-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62409-0. Epub 2015 Feb 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25662415 (View on PubMed)

Cheng SY, Levy AR, Lefaivre KA, Guy P, Kuramoto L, Sobolev B. Geographic trends in incidence of hip fractures: a comprehensive literature review. Osteoporos Int. 2011 Oct;22(10):2575-86. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1596-z. Epub 2011 Apr 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21484361 (View on PubMed)

Bentler SE, Liu L, Obrizan M, Cook EA, Wright KB, Geweke JF, Chrischilles EA, Pavlik CE, Wallace RB, Ohsfeldt RL, Jones MP, Rosenthal GE, Wolinsky FD. The aftermath of hip fracture: discharge placement, functional status change, and mortality. Am J Epidemiol. 2009 Nov 15;170(10):1290-9. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwp266. Epub 2009 Oct 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19808632 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

h9mwa68d

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.