Endoscopic Common Bile Duct Stones Clearance During Pregnancy
NCT ID: NCT06092905
Last Updated: 2023-10-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-04-01
2023-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
EUS Guided ERCP in Bile Duct Stone Removal
NCT02870686
Prospective Evaluation of Residual Bile Duct Stone by Peroral Cholangioscopy After Conventional ERCP
NCT03482375
Comparison Between Pre and Intraoperative ERCP in Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones
NCT01046552
ESWL Versus SOPIL for Treatment of Pancreatic Duct Stones
NCT04158297
Immediate vs. Elective Endoscopic Removal of Large CBD Stones in High-Risk Elderly Patients
NCT06948279
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Sedation and anesthesia was done by safe medications by senior anesthetist, and the endoscopic procedure was performed in left lateral decubitus instead of prone position. The gravid uterus was kept away from the monopolar electrocautery current pathway. Radiocontrast injection and fluoroscopy was deleted and replaced by trans-abdominal US and endoscopic bile aspiration Data including perioperative outcomes and follow up data will collected, tabulated and analyzed.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pregnant women with symptomatic common bile duct stones
Pregnant women with symptomatic common bile duct stones
Endoscopic clearance of common bile duct stones
Under general anesthesia, in left lateral decubitus, endoscopic clearance of common bile duct stones was done. Ultrasonography was used to ensure right positioning of the guide wire in the common bile duct, and ensure stone clearance.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Endoscopic clearance of common bile duct stones
Under general anesthesia, in left lateral decubitus, endoscopic clearance of common bile duct stones was done. Ultrasonography was used to ensure right positioning of the guide wire in the common bile duct, and ensure stone clearance.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
50 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
South Valley University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Abdallah Mohamed Taha Aly
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
ABDALLAH M ALY, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
South Valley University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Qena Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University Hospitals
Qina, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Luo L, Zen H, Xu H, Zhu Y, Liu P, Xia L, He W, Lv N. Clinical characteristics of acute pancreatitis in pregnancy: experience based on 121 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Feb;297(2):333-339. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4558-7. Epub 2017 Nov 21.
Xu Q, Wang S, Zhang Z. A 23-year, single-center, retrospective analysis of 36 cases of acute pancreatitis in pregnancy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Aug;130(2):123-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.02.034. Epub 2015 May 2.
Goldschmiedt M, Wolf L, Shires T. Treatment of symptomatic choledocholithiasis during pregnancy. Gastrointest Endosc. 1993 Nov-Dec;39(6):812-4. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(93)70272-2. No abstract available.
Tham TC, Vandervoort J, Wong RC, Montes H, Roston AD, Slivka A, Ferrari AP, Lichtenstein DR, Van Dam J, Nawfel RD, Soetikno R, Carr-Locke DL. Safety of ERCP during pregnancy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Feb;98(2):308-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2003.07261.x.
Inamdar S, Berzin TM, Sejpal DV, Pleskow DK, Chuttani R, Sawhney MS, Trindade AJ. Pregnancy is a Risk Factor for Pancreatitis After Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography in a National Cohort Study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jan;14(1):107-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2015.04.175. Epub 2015 May 5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SVU-MED-SUR11-4-23-3-601
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.