Feasibility and Efficacy of Individual SH+ Intervention

NCT ID: NCT06091540

Last Updated: 2025-02-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

37 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-10-01

Study Completion Date

2024-12-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The central aim of this research is to execute a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the impact and effectiveness of the individually-delivered SH+ intervention among earthquake survivors in Türkiye. The principal focus lies in investigating the potential benefits of the intervention. The key parameter of interest will be the extent of psychological distress encountered by the participants. In addition, various secondary outcomes will also be evaluated, encompassing depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, psychosocial well-being, and grief levels. The evaluation of the intervention's effectiveness on the sample of interest will hinge on the comparison of scores obtained during the pretest and posttest measurement phases. It is hypothesized that scores will exhibit a decline following the participants' engagement with the SH+ program over the span of five weeks. Specifically, the hypothesis being tested posits that there will be a notable reduction in depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, psychological distress, psychosocial impairment, and grief scores during the post-assessment stage in contrast to the pre-assessment stage. It is expected that the experimental condition and the control condition will demonstrate significant differences in depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress, psychosocial impairment, and grief scores. The primary outcome measure of psychological distress will show a statistically significant difference between the experimental and control groups at both the immediate posttest assessment and the 3-month follow-up assessment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

On February 6 2023, Türkiye experienced two consecutive major earthquakes measuring 7.6 and 7.8 on the Richter scale, resulting in extensive devastation across 11 provinces. According to data provided by the World Health Organization, the earthquakes resulted in a death toll of 51,000 and affected 9.1 million people, causing the displacement of 3 million individuals and the provision of accommodation for over 3 million people. The region experienced numerous subsequent aftershocks. The aftermath saw the collapse or severe damage of no fewer than 298,000 buildings. Earthquakes represent a well-explored phenomenon. The devastating impact of these seismic events goes beyond mere physical destruction and loss of life; it extends to people's aspirations and future plans, causing disruptions to the natural trajectory of their lives. While the anguish experienced by those who've lost loved ones cannot be alleviated, and the reality of the disaster cannot be undone, there may be measures we can adopt to alleviate its repercussions. A fundamental protective element, psychological flexibility, emerges as a means to mitigate the adverse aftermath of earthquakes. This trait empowers individuals to embrace psychological liberation by acknowledging their present circumstances and openly investigating the facets that are within and beyond their control. Natural calamities possess the capacity to reshape our perspective on the world. One's outlook on the future, self-perception, and perception of others undergo transformation compared to our pre-earthquake mindset. The seismic event disrupts the innate cognitive flow, triggering introspection about personal safety, one's role in the world, and the significance underlying social connections. The once-steadfast sense of security is replaced by a belief that danger looms, with vulnerability a constant companion. Traditional cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) often challenges these fears by demanding evidence-based thinking, while Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) offers a different approach. Notably, as psychological flexibility increases, so does one's capacity to manage posttraumatic stress symptoms. Self-Help Plus (SH+), an intervention developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), is designed as a stress management program based on the principles of ACT. Although originally intended for group settings, this study adapts the intervention for individual delivery, tailored specifically for adults affected by the earthquakes. SH+ comprises five sessions dedicated to fostering five essential skills: grounding, disengaging from unhelpful thoughts, aligning actions with personal values, practicing kindness, and creating emotional space. While SH+ was originally conceptualized as a group-based intervention designed to foster social support and shared experiences among participants, this study adapts it for a one-on-one format, emphasizing a more personalized therapeutic approach. This individualized intervention is structured to help participants navigate their distress in a targeted, cost-effective, and concise manner. In the context of earthquake survivors, SH+ has the potential to offer a structured, evidence-based method for developing crucial coping skills, even within the individualized delivery model.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Grief Disorder, Prolonged

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Outcomes assessors will be blind to the conditions of the participants.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Feasibility and Efficacy of Individual SH+ Intervention

The first phase of the study involves executing a pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) with an earthquake-adapted iteration of the SH+ intervention. This phase will introduce modifications to the traditional SH+ approach. Unlike the conventional SH+ manual, which includes audio elements and paired discussions centered around specific topics, the adapted version will omit the audio components. Instead, the intervention will be delivered directly by the psychologist on a one-on-one basis. Additionally, while the original SH+ format involves paired discussions within a group setting, this study will focus on individual sessions. The intervention aims to provide a more personalized approach, promoting a more individualized and humane dimension to the healing process.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Feasibility and Efficacy of Individual SH+ Intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The key parameter of interest will be the extent of psychological distress encountered by the participants. In addition, various secondary outcomes will also be evaluated, encompassing depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, psychosocial well-being, and grief levels. The evaluation of the intervention's effectiveness on the sample of interest will hinge on the comparison of scores obtained during the pretest and posttest measurement phases.

Treatment as Usual

Participants will undergo random assignment to either the treatment as usual (TAU) condition or the intervention condition. Upon completion of all measurements, the control condition will be given the opportunity to receive the intervention.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Feasibility and Efficacy of Individual SH+ Intervention

The key parameter of interest will be the extent of psychological distress encountered by the participants. In addition, various secondary outcomes will also be evaluated, encompassing depression, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, psychosocial well-being, and grief levels. The evaluation of the intervention's effectiveness on the sample of interest will hinge on the comparison of scores obtained during the pretest and posttest measurement phases.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* To be eligible for participation in this study, an individual must satisfy all of the following conditions:
* Age 18 years or older
* Have directly experienced the earthquake
* Exhibit elevated levels of psychological distress, indicated by a score exceeding 15 on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) (Kessler et al., 2002)
* Display impaired psychosocial functioning, as evidenced by a score surpassing 16 on the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) (WHO, 2010)

Exclusion Criteria

* An individual meeting any of the subsequent criteria will not be included in this study:
* Presence of acute medical conditions
* Manifestation of imminent suicide risk or demonstration of acute needs/protection risks (assessed with Problem Management Plus (PM+) manual suicidality assessment)
* Affliction with severe mental disorders, such as psychotic disorders or substance dependence (assessed with PM+ manual, observation checklist),
* Experience of severe cognitive impairment, encompassing conditions like severe intellectual disability or dementia (PM+ manual observation checklist)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Koç University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ceren Acarturk

Principal investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ceren Acarturk, P.h.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Koç University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Koc University

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Turkey (Türkiye)

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Tol WA, Augustinavicius J, Carswell K, Brown FL, Adaku A, Leku MR, Garcia-Moreno C, Ventevogel P, White RG, van Ommeren M. Translation, adaptation, and pilot of a guided self-help intervention to reduce psychological distress in South Sudanese refugees in Uganda. Glob Ment Health (Camb). 2018 Jul 27;5:e25. doi: 10.1017/gmh.2018.14. eCollection 2018.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30128161 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2023.292.IRB3.135

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

EMDR vs. CBT for PTSD
NCT06758362 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA