Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-05-14
2026-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
High-Flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy for Exacerbation of Chronic Pulmonary Obstructive Disease.
NCT03488628
Nasal High-Flow in COPD
NCT03564236
Effects of Nasal High-flow Oxygen in Patients With an Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
NCT03214458
Effect of High Flow Nasal During Exercise in COPD Patients
NCT03058081
Nasal High Flow (NHF) in COPD - Effects on Ventilation in Wakefulness
NCT05053074
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Objective: To assess the feasibility of a larger study comparing HFNO with NIV as first line treatment in hypercapnic, acidotic AECOPD.
Study design: prospective, randomized, multi-center, unblinded, pilot study. Study population: Patients with acidotic, hypercapnic AECOPD Intervention (if applicable): HFNO versus NIV as first line treatment at presentation Main study parameters/endpoints: Feasibility: screening rate, inclusion rate, feasibility as qualified by staff and nurses.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: All participating patients will receive standard of care (i.e., admission to the monitored ward or ICU for intensive monitoring and regular blood withdrawals, steroids, bronchodilator inhalation therapy). There will be one extra questionnaire after 3 months, but no extra blood samples or site visits, compared to regular care for the participating patients. Permission of the patient will be obtained to register date of hospital discharge and outcome after ICU discharge and ask them to fill out questionnaires at 3 months after admission about their quality of life. Previous studies have not shown that HFNO is inferior to NIV with regards to outcomes (intubation rate, mortality), albeit that they were not powered to prove non-inferiority.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
High Flow Nasal Oxygen (HFNO)
Patients will start at a flow of 50 L/min and a temperature of 37°C, FiO2¬ will start at 25%, and titrated to target SpO2 (88-92%, as in usual care).
HFNO
Respiratory support with HFNO (as opposed to NIV, as per standard of care)
Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV)
Patients will be started at
* Using the facemask interface: EPAP/PEEP set at 5-7 cmH2O and PS of 5-7 cmH2O (equal to IPAP of 10-14 cmH2O).
* Using the helmet interface; EPAP/PEEP set at least 10 cmH2O and PS of 10 cmH2O (equal to IPAP of 20 cmH2O).
* PEEP/EPAP and IPAP/PS can be titrated to effectiveness, tolerance and comfort
* FiO2 should be set to achieve a SpO2 of 88-92%
NIV
Respiratory support with Non-invasive ventilation, standard of care
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
HFNO
Respiratory support with HFNO (as opposed to NIV, as per standard of care)
NIV
Respiratory support with Non-invasive ventilation, standard of care
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Acute hypercapnic exacerbation of this condition, defined as: PaCO2\>45 mmHg or \>6.0 kPa and pH 7.20-7.35
* Age \>40 years
Exclusion Criteria
* Immediate need for intubation, based on clinical judgement of the attending physician.
* Impossibility to apply either one of the two interventions
* Patient not expected to give immediate or delayed informed consent (e.g. known cognitive impairment, dementia, active serious psychiatric disease, mental retardation).
* Established home-NIV or home CPAP, known indication for home-NIV or CPAP (e.g. OSAS or obesitas hypoventilation syndrome).
* Impeding death
* Concurrent (respiratory) diseases that may influence treatment efficacy: acute heart infarction, cardiogenic lung edema, massive pulmonary embolism (intermediate-high risk or more). NB; pulmonary infections (viral and bacterial) are a common cause of exacerbation and are no reason for exclusion.
* Other acute diseases that preclude participation in the trial such as hemodynamic instability (need for vasopressors), reduced consciousness with need for intubation, severe intoxication
* Tracheostomized patients
* Participation in other interventional trials
* Impossibility to admit the patient to the participating ICU or monitored ward (e.g. medium care / high dependency unit, depending on local infrastructure).
* Previous explicit (or written) objection to participation in research - bicarbonate \<20 mmol/L
40 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Reinier de Graaf Groep
OTHER
Haga Medisch Centrum
UNKNOWN
Ikazia Hospital, Rotterdam
OTHER
Franciscus Gasthuis
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dorien Kiers, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Reinier de Graaf
Delft, , Netherlands
Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland
Rotterdam, , Netherlands
Ikazia
Rotterdam, , Netherlands
Haaglanden Medisch Centrum
The Hague, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Louise Urlings, MD, PhD
Role: primary
Doiren Kiers, MD, PhD
Role: primary
Susanne Stads, MD, PhD
Role: primary
Peter van Vliet, MD, PhD
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
HiCAP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.