Evaluation in 15 Participants of Blood Flow, Comfort and Efficiency, Using 1 vs 36 Hz Stimulation Via Textile Electrodes
NCT ID: NCT06082297
Last Updated: 2023-10-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
15 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-07-17
2019-08-13
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Does NMES Help Relieve Lower Limb Oedema and Improve Joint Mobility and Skin Tissue Oxygenation Levels?
NCT01936155
Blood Flow Stimulation in the Lower Limbs by Application of Different External Devices
NCT03420625
Blood Flow Restricted Electrical Stimulation During Immobilisation
NCT05093985
Influence of Electrode Positioning and Current Type on Fatigue, Force and Discomfort
NCT04200677
Direct Current Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Peripheral Neuropathy
NCT05442021
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SEQUENTIAL
BASIC_SCIENCE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Single arm where repeated measures where performed in 15 participants.
Each of the 15 participants in the arm was, in addition to the resting state (no intervention), exposed to 10 different interventions repeated after each other to enable repeated measures of the outcomes.
Chattanooga Physio, DJO, neuromuscular electrical stimulation
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) was applied with a device called Chattanooga Physio (DJO), testing 10 different combinations of parameter-settings. The parameter-settings that were varied and combined were frequency (1Hz and 36Hz) and plateau times (0.5s, 1.5s, 3s, 5s, 7s). The NMES was applied to the calf of the participants via transversally placed textile electrodes (3x3 cm) integrated in a sock starting with very low current amplitude followed by gradual small increases in current amplitude until induction of ankle plantar flexion, at which time-point the outcomes where measured.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Chattanooga Physio, DJO, neuromuscular electrical stimulation
Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) was applied with a device called Chattanooga Physio (DJO), testing 10 different combinations of parameter-settings. The parameter-settings that were varied and combined were frequency (1Hz and 36Hz) and plateau times (0.5s, 1.5s, 3s, 5s, 7s). The NMES was applied to the calf of the participants via transversally placed textile electrodes (3x3 cm) integrated in a sock starting with very low current amplitude followed by gradual small increases in current amplitude until induction of ankle plantar flexion, at which time-point the outcomes where measured.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Voluntary participation
Exclusion Criteria
* Pacemaker
* Ongoing thromboprophylaxis
* Skin wounds
* Vascular abnormalities
* Previous vascular system surgery in the lower limbs
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Karolinska University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Paul Ackermann
Professor,MD,PhD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paul Ackermann, PhD, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Karolinska Institutet
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Karolinska university Hospital
Stockholm, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Juthberg R, Flodin J, Aliaga N, Guo L, Rodriguez S, Persson NK, Ackermann PW. Electrically induced hemodynamic enhancement via sock-integrated electrodes is more comfortable and efficient at 1 hz as compared to 36 hz. Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 15;15(1):12944. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97431-3.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
TTE_PVV_1_vs_36_Hz
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.