Evaluation in 15 Participants of Blood Flow, Comfort and Efficiency, Using 1 vs 36 Hz Stimulation Via Textile Electrodes

NCT ID: NCT06082297

Last Updated: 2023-10-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

15 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-07-17

Study Completion Date

2019-08-13

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Muscle contractions induced by calf low-intensity neuromuscular electrical stimulation (C-LI-NMES) can increase venous return and may reduce venous thromboembolism. This study aimed to compare the effect of different C-LI-NMES frequencies and plateau times on hemodynamics, discomfort and energy efficiency, when applied via sock-integrated transverse textile electrodes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Fifteen healthy participants were stimulated via two 3x3cm transverse textile electrodes integrated in a sock, with ten different combinations of frequency (1Hz or 36Hz) and plateau times (0.5/1.5/3/5/7s), with gradually increasing NMES-intensity until plantar flexion-induction. At this point, popliteal peak venous velocity (PVV), time-averaged mean velocity (TAMV) and ejection volume (EV) were assessed by Doppler-ultrasound, discomfort by a numerical rating scale (NRS, 0-10) and values for current amplitude and energy were calculated based on the NMES-device“s intensity level. Values expressed with median (interquartile range), significance set to p\<0.05.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hemodynamic Instability Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SEQUENTIAL

Repeated measures tests on on each of the 15 participants, comparing outcomes for no intervention and 10 different interventions in the form of variations in parameter-settings of neuromuscular electrical stimulation, with gradually increasing current amplitude until induction of ankle plantar flexion.
Primary Study Purpose

BASIC_SCIENCE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Participants did not receive information about what parameter-settings that were used for the different tests.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Single arm where repeated measures where performed in 15 participants.

Each of the 15 participants in the arm was, in addition to the resting state (no intervention), exposed to 10 different interventions repeated after each other to enable repeated measures of the outcomes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Chattanooga Physio, DJO, neuromuscular electrical stimulation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) was applied with a device called Chattanooga Physio (DJO), testing 10 different combinations of parameter-settings. The parameter-settings that were varied and combined were frequency (1Hz and 36Hz) and plateau times (0.5s, 1.5s, 3s, 5s, 7s). The NMES was applied to the calf of the participants via transversally placed textile electrodes (3x3 cm) integrated in a sock starting with very low current amplitude followed by gradual small increases in current amplitude until induction of ankle plantar flexion, at which time-point the outcomes where measured.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Chattanooga Physio, DJO, neuromuscular electrical stimulation

Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) was applied with a device called Chattanooga Physio (DJO), testing 10 different combinations of parameter-settings. The parameter-settings that were varied and combined were frequency (1Hz and 36Hz) and plateau times (0.5s, 1.5s, 3s, 5s, 7s). The NMES was applied to the calf of the participants via transversally placed textile electrodes (3x3 cm) integrated in a sock starting with very low current amplitude followed by gradual small increases in current amplitude until induction of ankle plantar flexion, at which time-point the outcomes where measured.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Device name and manufacturer:

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18-99 years of age
* Voluntary participation

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy
* Pacemaker
* Ongoing thromboprophylaxis
* Skin wounds
* Vascular abnormalities
* Previous vascular system surgery in the lower limbs
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

99 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Karolinska University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Paul Ackermann

Professor,MD,PhD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paul Ackermann, PhD, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Karolinska Institutet

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Karolinska university Hospital

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Juthberg R, Flodin J, Aliaga N, Guo L, Rodriguez S, Persson NK, Ackermann PW. Electrically induced hemodynamic enhancement via sock-integrated electrodes is more comfortable and efficient at 1 hz as compared to 36 hz. Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 15;15(1):12944. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-97431-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40234723 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TTE_PVV_1_vs_36_Hz

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

NMES and Chronic Ankle Instability
NCT04322409 UNKNOWN PHASE1