The Effects of Continuous vs. Intermittent Caloric Restriction on Fat Los
NCT ID: NCT06079658
Last Updated: 2023-10-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-10-01
2023-08-15
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Weight Outlooks by Restriction of Diet and Sleep
NCT02413866
The Effects of Combined Energy and Carbohydrate Restriction on Exercise Capacity
NCT06381908
Comparison of Low Fat and Low Carbohydrate Diets With Respect to Weight Loss and Metabolic Effects
NCT00956566
The Effect of Time Restricted Feeding on Fat Mass in Overweight Women
NCT02629900
Intermittent Fasting Versus Daily Caloric Restriction for Weight Loss
NCT03411356
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Research in overweight and obese individuals has shown that periods of moderate caloric restriction interspersed with periods of consuming a diet in balance with one's daily energy needs (caloric maintenance) is at least comparable to continuous energy restriction in terms of weight and fat loss outcomes (3) and may even bestow unique benefits by promoting greater retention of fat-free mass and a higher metabolic rate (4). However, to date, no published research has examined continuous caloric restriction compared to Intermittent energy restriction (diet breaks and diet refeeds) in females only with Obesity.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Continuous Caloric Restriction (CCR) group:
Participants in this group will be placed on a diet that is prescribed a 25% reduction from maintenance calories (calories to maintain current body weight) with a dietary protein intake of 1.2 g of protein/kg body mass and remaining calories split evenly between fat and carbohydrate. In this group they will adhere to a 25% caloric reduction daily for 12 weeks.
Continuous Caloric Restriction versus Intermittent Caloric Restriction on Fat Loss
This intervention seeks to investigate two different caloric restriction protocol on fat mass.
Intermittent Caloric Restriction (ICR) group:
Participants in this group will be placed on a diet that is prescribed a 25% reduction from maintenance calories (calories to maintain current body weight) with a dietary protein intake of 1.2 g of protein/kg body mass and remaining calories split evenly between fat and carbohydrate. Participants will adhere to a 25% caloric deficit daily and on every 7th day they will eat their maintenance calories known as a "diet refeed" and then on the 3rd week they will take a "diet break" of eating their Maintenance calories for 7 days.
Continuous Caloric Restriction versus Intermittent Caloric Restriction on Fat Loss
This intervention seeks to investigate two different caloric restriction protocol on fat mass.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Continuous Caloric Restriction versus Intermittent Caloric Restriction on Fat Loss
This intervention seeks to investigate two different caloric restriction protocol on fat mass.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
65 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Coastal Carolina University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Kelly Johnson
Assistant Professor Exercise Science
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Williams Brice Building
Conway, South Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Trexler ET, Smith-Ryan AE, Norton LE. Metabolic adaptation to weight loss: implications for the athlete. J Int Soc Sports Nutr. 2014 Feb 27;11(1):7. doi: 10.1186/1550-2783-11-7.
Fothergill E, Guo J, Howard L, Kerns JC, Knuth ND, Brychta R, Chen KY, Skarulis MC, Walter M, Walter PJ, Hall KD. Persistent metabolic adaptation 6 years after "The Biggest Loser" competition. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Aug;24(8):1612-9. doi: 10.1002/oby.21538. Epub 2016 May 2.
Arguin H, Dionne IJ, Senechal M, Bouchard DR, Carpentier AC, Ardilouze JL, Tremblay A, Leblanc C, Brochu M. Short- and long-term effects of continuous versus intermittent restrictive diet approaches on body composition and the metabolic profile in overweight and obese postmenopausal women: a pilot study. Menopause. 2012 Aug;19(8):870-6. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e318250a287.
Byrne NM, Sainsbury A, King NA, Hills AP, Wood RE. Intermittent energy restriction improves weight loss efficiency in obese men: the MATADOR study. Int J Obes (Lond). 2018 Feb;42(2):129-138. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2017.206. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2023.06
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.