Comparison of the Sugarbaker and Keyhole Repair for Parastomal Hernia

NCT ID: NCT06077318

Last Updated: 2023-10-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-20

Study Completion Date

2023-12-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Parastomal hernia (PSH) is difficult to manage, with high rates of post-operative recurrence and complication. Keyhole and Sugarbaker are the most commonly used techniques in the surgical repair of the PSH. However, the efficacy and safety of the two surgical methods have not been adequately compared in the East Asian population.

Patients diagnosed with PSH who underwent Sugarbaker or Keyhole repair from August 2012 to August 2022 will be included. Patient demographic data and postoperative outcomes will be retrospectively analyzed. The primary outcome measure is the recurrence rate at one year follow-up time.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Consecutive patients undergoing surgical PSH repair in the Hernia Center of Huadong Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University from August 2012 to August 2022 were included in this study. Huadong Hospital undertakes surgical treatment of complex hernia and abdominal wall diseases in Shanghai, China. The surgical records and clinical data of patients will be retrospectively analyzed. Due to the retrospective design of the study, the patient's informed consent was waived. The study was conducted following the ethical standards set out in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

The patient's surgical strategy was made by the center's experienced colorectal surgeons or specialists in the department of hernia and abdominal wall surgery. In surgical practice, preference is given to the laparoscopic approach, while open surgery is chosen in cases of severe abdominal adhesions. The following three aspects of clinical data were recorded: (1) patients' demographic data, such as age, sex, the primary disease for the stoma, body mass index and comorbidities; (2) Surgical details: repair technique, size of abdominal wall defect, duration of the surgical procedure; (3) Short-term and long-term postoperative outcomes: the primary outcome is the recurrence rate at one year follow-up time, while the secondary outcomes were length and cost of the hospitalization, and rates of the intensive care unit admission, chronic pain, surgical site infection (SSI), re-admission and re-operation rates within 30 days after surgery, major complications after surgery, and surgery-related death.

Only PSH patients who received intraperitoneal onlay Sugarbaker and Keyhole mesh were included. These patients were scheduled for follow-up appointments at the outpatient clinics, specifically at 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year after surgery. If recurrence is suspected by the surgeon after a physical examination, the patient would be requested for an abdominal CT scan. During the CT scan, patients were asked to perform the Valsava maneuver to facilitate the identification of any potential recurrences through imaging. Postoperative major complications were defined as complications requiring hospitalization after surgery to the one-year follow-up time. Patients with follow-up periods of less than one year were excluded from the cohort. Recorded death, recurrence, or loss to follow-up were considered to be the endpoint.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Parastomal Hernia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Keyhole repair

The keyhole technique involves placing a mesh with a slit in the central hole around the intestinal ring, allowing facilitating the passage of the intestine through the central slit.

Keyhole repair

Intervention Type OTHER

The keyhole technique involves placing a mesh with a slit in the central hole around the intestinal ring, allowing facilitating the passage of the intestine through the central slit.

Sugarbaker repair

The modified Sugarbaker technique uses a mesh to place a patch on the lateralized intestine, effectively preventing herniation of abdominal contents through the stoma.

Sugarbaker repair

Intervention Type OTHER

The modified Sugarbaker technique uses a mesh to place a patch on the lateralized intestine, effectively preventing herniation of abdominal contents through the stoma.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Keyhole repair

The keyhole technique involves placing a mesh with a slit in the central hole around the intestinal ring, allowing facilitating the passage of the intestine through the central slit.

Intervention Type OTHER

Sugarbaker repair

The modified Sugarbaker technique uses a mesh to place a patch on the lateralized intestine, effectively preventing herniation of abdominal contents through the stoma.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Only PSH patients who received intraperitoneal onlay Sugarbaker and Keyhole mesh were included.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with less than one year follow-up periods were excluded from the cohort.

Patients received other repair approaches.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fudan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Zhijun Bao

Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Shi H, Li S, Lin Y, Yang D, Dong W, Song Z, Song H, Gu Y. Comparison of the 3-D mesh and Sugarbaker repair for parastomal hernia: a single center experience in China. Updates Surg. 2024 Sep;76(5):1991-1996. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01946-9. Epub 2024 Jul 21.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39033484 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Huadong hernia

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Repair of Inguinal Hernia
NCT06514859 RECRUITING NA