Long Term Effects of Inspiratory Muscle Training in Cerebral Palsy
NCT ID: NCT06064292
Last Updated: 2023-10-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
27 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-03-21
2023-09-21
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methods: This was a controlled, randomised, double-blind trial and with allocation concealment performed on 27 institutionalized CP patients randomly distributed in 2 groups, "high intensity training group" (HIT) and "low intensity training group" (LIT). Participants followed a specific IMT program for 8 weeks, HIT workload was 40% of maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and LIT workload was 20% MIP. Once finished 8-week training period, CP patients continued their daily activities. Respiratory muscle strength and pulmonary function were measured pre-IMT, post-IMT, 4, 12 and 24 weeks after finishing IMT.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Inspiratory Muscle Training in Cerebral Palsy Patients
NCT04915170
Respiratory Muscle Training in Acquired Brain Injury Patients.
NCT06070831
Inspiratory Muscle Training With Powerbreath Device in Patients With ALS
NCT04889248
Does Inspiratory Muscle Training Improve Functional Capacity in Subjects With Obstructive Sleep Apnea?
NCT02584205
Respiratory Muscle Training in Adults With Spinal Cord Injury
NCT05904600
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Participants Institutionalized adults with CP aged between 35 and 64 years were included in the study, they were all members of ASPACE Salamanca. 38 patients with CP were selected to participate in the study. 27 participants were voluntarily recruited to participate in respiratory training and randomly distributed in the High Intensity Training Group (HIT) or Low Intensity Training Group (LIT).
Exclusion criteria: the presence of a respiratory disease in the previous month, inability to understand assessment tests or intervention or hemodynamic alterations (heart rate \> 150 beats per minute (bpm), systolic blood pressure \> 140 millimeters mercury (mmHg) or diastolic blood pressure \> 90 mmHg).
The sample size was established by sampling calculation done from collected during a pilot study with 10 volunteers, which determined a minimum of 10 patients for each group to perceive differences of 12 cmH2O for MIP, power of 80%, security of 95%.
Procedures and Measures of Outcomes Elderly people with cerebral palsy were randomly allocated, via computerized random assignment, to either a high intensity intervention group or a low intensity intervention group. The professional that collected the data and the participants were unaware of group assignment. Before (pre-intervention) and after (post-intervention) inspiratory muscle training, respiratory muscle strength and pulmonary function were evaluated. Once the intervention period phase ended, 3 more evaluations of the same parameters were mare, the first at 4 weeks, the second at 12 weeks and the third at 24 weeks after finishing IMT.
Primary outcome The primary outcome was respiratory muscle strength, measured pre-IMT, post-IMT and 4, 12 and 24 weeks after finishing IMT intervention. It was evaluated through maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) and maximum expiratory pressure (MEP) using a pressure measurer (Elka PM-15, Laboliser, S.A., Barcelona, Spain), from residual volume and total lung capacity, severally. Each measure was expressed in millibars and turned into centimeter of water, reference unit, (cm H2O) (1 mbar = 1.01973 cm H2O), according to recommendations of the American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society (ATS / ERS) \[24\]. Each test was repeated 3 times or until 2 valid results were obtained (difference less than 5%). A rest time of 1 minute was respected between efforts to prevent short-term respiratory muscle fatigue. The highest value was selected. MIP was evaluated every 2 weeks to graduate the load of the device training.
Secondary outcome The secondary outcome was pulmonary function, measured pre-IMT, post-IMT and 4, 12 and 24 weeks after finishing IMT intervention. The data collected were forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and peak expiratory flow (PEF). It was measured using the peak flow device (Asma-1, Vitalograph Ltd, Buckingham, England) that expresses the results of FEV1 in liters (L) and PEF in liters per minute (L/min), according to the guidelines of the ATS/ERS.
Experimental Protocol Inspiratory muscle training was carried out with a pressure threshold device (Treshold IMT, Philips-Respironics, Pittsburg, PA, USA). Threshold IMT provides consistent and specific pressure for inspiratory muscle strength and endurance training, regardless of how quickly or slowly patients breathe. This device incorporates a flow-independent one-way valve to ensure consistent resistance and features an adjustable specific pressure setting (in cm H2O) to be set by a healthcare professional. When patients inhale through Threshold IMT, a spring-loaded valve provides resistance. Before training began, the participants and primary caregivers completed one-session familiarization with a specialist to learn how to operate the device.
Adult people with cerebral palsy carried out the training program for 8 weeks, 1 session every day, 5 days a week. The participants performed 10 series of 1 minute with 1-minute rest between them.
The High Intensity Training Group (HIT) received IMT at 40% of MIP, the training load was set each 2 weeks to keep 40% of MIP. The Low Intensity Training Group (LIT) received IMT at 20% of MIP, following the same rules as HIT.
The training protocols of the two groups were developed by a specialist in respiratory therapy and all sessions with IMT were supervised by their main caregiver, therefore adherence to the program was controlled, as well as possible unwanted effects (increased fatigue, breathing problems, dizziness or sickness).
During the intervention period, both groups continued with their usual activity, receiving physiotherapy treatment for 45 minutes per day, 2 days per week. No participants received any other treatments.
After finishing the 8-week intervention period with IMT, CP patients stopped training with IMT and continued with their daily normal activities. During the following 24 weeks (without IMT), three evaluations of the respiratory parameters analyzed in the trial were made (MIP, MEP, FEV1, PEF). The first evaluation was made 4 weeks after the intervention was completed, the second 12 weeks and the third 24 weeks after finishing IMT.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
The High Intensity Training Group (HIT)
The High Intensity Training Group (HIT) received IMT at 40% of Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (MIP), the training load was set each 2 weeks to keep 40% of MIP.
INSPIRATORY MUSCLE TRAINING
After finishing the 8-week intervention period with IMT, CP patients stopped training with IMT and continued with their daily normal activities. During the following 24 weeks (without IMT), three evaluations of the respiratory parameters analyzed in the trial were made (MIP, MEP, FEV1, PEF). The first evaluation was made 4 weeks after the intervention was completed, the second 12 weeks and the third 24 weeks after finishing IMT.
The Low Intensity Training Group (LIT)
The Low Intensity Training Group (LIT) received IMT at 20% of MIP, following the same rules as HIT.
INSPIRATORY MUSCLE TRAINING
After finishing the 8-week intervention period with IMT, CP patients stopped training with IMT and continued with their daily normal activities. During the following 24 weeks (without IMT), three evaluations of the respiratory parameters analyzed in the trial were made (MIP, MEP, FEV1, PEF). The first evaluation was made 4 weeks after the intervention was completed, the second 12 weeks and the third 24 weeks after finishing IMT.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
INSPIRATORY MUSCLE TRAINING
After finishing the 8-week intervention period with IMT, CP patients stopped training with IMT and continued with their daily normal activities. During the following 24 weeks (without IMT), three evaluations of the respiratory parameters analyzed in the trial were made (MIP, MEP, FEV1, PEF). The first evaluation was made 4 weeks after the intervention was completed, the second 12 weeks and the third 24 weeks after finishing IMT.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* Inability to understand assessment tests or intervention
* Hemodynamic alterations (heart rate \> 150 beats per minute (bpm), systolic blood pressure \> 140 millimeters mercury (mmHg) or diastolic blood pressure \> 90 mmHg).
35 Years
64 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Salamanca
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
CARLOS MARTIN SANCHEZ
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Carlos Martin Sanchez, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Salamanca
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Salamanca
Salamanca, , Spain
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
21032023
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.