A Randomized Controlled Trial of LOT-CRT Versus conventionaL BiVP in Heart Failure Patients With NICD
NCT ID: NCT06061627
Last Updated: 2025-03-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
86 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-21
2027-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Application of Right Atrial Left Ventricular Fusion Pacing in Patients With CRT Indications
NCT03071978
Left Bundle Branch Pacing Versus Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT04110431
Clinical Efficacy of Early Left Bundle Branch Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT06126081
Safety and Effectiveness of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing Versus Conventional Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure
NCT07069738
CSP Versus BiVP for Heart Failure Patients with RVP Upgraded to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy
NCT06241651
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Compared with patients with typical LBBB, traditional biventricular pacing synchronized treatment is less effective in chronic heart failure patients accompanied by intraventricular block (NICD), which is closely related to the electrophysiological mechanism of LBBB. The blocking site of typical LBBB is generally located within the His bundle to the proximal end of the left bundle branch, while the distal end of the left bundle branch is relatively healthy. Therefore, LBBP can completely correct this type of LBBB and significantly narrow the QRS wave; The electrophysiological mechanism of NICD is relatively complex, and there may be multiple blocking sites, and LBBP cannot be completely corrected. How to improve the treatment efficacy and clinical prognosis of chronic heart failure patients with NICD is an important scientific issue that urgently needs to be solved. It is unclear whether left bundle branch pacing technology can provide support for cardiac function in such patients.
Traditional biventricular pacing combines right ventricular and left epicardial pacing; LBBAP combined with left ventricular epicardial pacing, also known as LOT-CRT, is an innovative pacing method. This study aims to explore the application value of LBBAP in patients with chronic heart failure and NICD.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
LOT-CRT group
In this arm, an right artrial (RA) lead, an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) lead and a LV pacing lead are placed are conventionally implanted.
A left bundle branch pacing(LBBP) lead is attempted to be placed.
LOT-CRT group
In addition to the leads implanted in BiVP group, it is also necessary to implant the left bundle branch area pacing(LBBAP) leads
LBBAP includes LBBP and LVSP.
LBBP is defined if fulfilling criterion 1 and at least one in criteria 2:
1. Paced morphology of RBBD in surface lead V1 (QR, Qr, rSr', rSR' or Qrs);
2. One of the following should be met, while the pacing threshold ≤ 1.5V/0.5ms:
1. Selective LBBP capture pattern appears, with an iso-electrical window between the pacing spike and QRS onset;
2. When reducing the output voltage, the LVAT undergoes a sudden change of\>10ms;
If criterion 1 is fulfilled but none in criteria 2 is met, the procedure is considered to be left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP).
BiVP group
In this arm, an RA lead , an ICD lead and a LV pacing lead are placed.
BiVP group
Implantation of a LV pacing lead is attempted using the standard-of-care technique first.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
LOT-CRT group
In addition to the leads implanted in BiVP group, it is also necessary to implant the left bundle branch area pacing(LBBAP) leads
LBBAP includes LBBP and LVSP.
LBBP is defined if fulfilling criterion 1 and at least one in criteria 2:
1. Paced morphology of RBBD in surface lead V1 (QR, Qr, rSr', rSR' or Qrs);
2. One of the following should be met, while the pacing threshold ≤ 1.5V/0.5ms:
1. Selective LBBP capture pattern appears, with an iso-electrical window between the pacing spike and QRS onset;
2. When reducing the output voltage, the LVAT undergoes a sudden change of\>10ms;
If criterion 1 is fulfilled but none in criteria 2 is met, the procedure is considered to be left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP).
BiVP group
Implantation of a LV pacing lead is attempted using the standard-of-care technique first.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Optimal medical therapy for at lest 3 months
3. NYHA class II-IV
4. LVEF≤35% as assessed by echocardiography
5. Sinus rhythm (may have paroxysmal atrial fibrillation)
6. QRS duration ≥ 150ms
7. Intraventricular block (NICD), QRS morphology is neither LBBB nor RBBB
Exclusion Criteria
2. After mechanical tricuspid valve replacement
3. Persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
4. Second or third degree atrioventricular block
5. Have a history of acute myocardial infarction within 3 months prior to enrollment
6. Patient's expected survival time is less than 12 months
7. Pregnant or planned to conceive
8. Ventricular septal hypertrophy (ventricular septal thickness exceeds 15mm at the end of diastole)
9. Patients with simple and persistent left superior vena cava
10. Patients with existing pacemaker implantation
18 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
OTHER
Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital
OTHER
Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, China
OTHER
West China Hospital
OTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University
OTHER
The First People's Hospital of Yunnan
OTHER
Xinhua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine
OTHER
Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
OTHER
Shanghai Tong Ren Hospital
OTHER
Fujian Provincial Hospital
OTHER
Fujian Medical University Union Hospital
OTHER
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jiangang Zou
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Yangang Su
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
The First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wang Y, Zhu H, Hou X, Wang Z, Zou F, Qian Z, Wei Y, Wang X, Zhang L, Li X, Liu Z, Xue S, Qin C, Zeng J, Li H, Wu H, Ma H, Ellenbogen KA, Gold MR, Fan X, Zou J; LBBP-RESYNC Investigators. Randomized Trial of Left Bundle Branch vs Biventricular Pacing for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Sep 27;80(13):1205-1216. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.07.019.
Jastrzebski M, Moskal P, Huybrechts W, Curila K, Sreekumar P, Rademakers LM, Ponnusamy SS, Herweg B, Sharma PS, Bednarek A, Rajzer M, Vijayaraman P. Left bundle branch-optimized cardiac resynchronization therapy (LOT-CRT): Results from an international LBBAP collaborative study group. Heart Rhythm. 2022 Jan;19(1):13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.07.057. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
FirstNanjingMU005
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.