Joint Aspiration in Dysfunctional Hip, Knee or Shoulder Prostheses

NCT ID: NCT06054711

Last Updated: 2023-09-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

600 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-02-07

Study Completion Date

2024-08-07

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

After a hip, knee or shoulder arthroplasty, the evolution is not always favorable. It can be marked by an infectious or non-infectious complication, most often implant failure. In this context, joint fluid aspiration (JFA) is indicated to document a prosthetic joint infection (PJI) or to bring to light arguments for implant failure. Nevertheless, opinions differ on its indication for microbiological identification. Some teams perform it systematically when faced with a prosthesis dysfunction. Others, only in the presence of suggestive signs of PJI. Finally, others never perform it.

Based on clinical, radiological and biological (CRP) signs, at the preoperative stage and before JFA, we classify our patients into 3 groups: supposedly septic (chronic joint infection), supposedly aseptic (implant failure) or intermediate (Unknown). This last group, often encountered in consultation, poses a diagnosis problem more than the others.

In our experience, JFA is an essential diagnosis tool in these 3 groups of patients. It helps to choose the surgical strategy. In addition, the dosage of biomarkers in the joint fluid as the alpha defensin, the leucocyte esterase and the CRP could provide an additional argument to investigate the infectious origin or not, in particular in difficult cases.

In summary, the disagreement on the usefulness of JFA in case of PJI suspicion and any other prosthetic dysfunction, the lack of data on large prospective studies and our questioning about the contribution of JFA in the aseptic and intermediate group of patients, motivated us to set up this study to evaluate the interest of the JFA for the preoperative diagnosis, as well as that of the dosage of biomarkers in the joint fluid.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Visit V0: corresponds to the first consultation. After informing and obtaining the consent of the patient, the investigator will collect the anamnesis, clinical, radiological and biological data, then will indicate the anticipated medico-surgical strategy. The FJA will be prescribed during this consultation, as well as the dosage of the CRP in blood the same day as the FJA.

Then, the investigator will classify the patient (primary classification) in one of the three groups the groups: supposedly septic, supposedly aseptic or intermediate.

A reclassification of patients (secondary classification) will be done, based on the bacteriological results of the FJA (positive, negative and doubtful). Biomarker results will not be disclosed or considered for patient care.

Visit V1: corresponds to the day of the FJA in the x.ray department and the blood sample in the central laboratory for the CRP dosage.

During FJA, 2 ml of additional joint fluid will be collected in addition to the volume usually collected for CRP, Leukocyte Esterase and alpha defensin dosage in joint fluid. Alpha defensin dosage will be performed only in patients in the intermediate group with a negative FJA.

Visit V2: Day of prosthesis revision in the event of chronic PJI or mechanical prosthesis dysfunction (Implant failure) requiring surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Joint Prosthesis; Complications

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Prospective cohorte study
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Joint Fluid Aspiration

all included patients reporting prothesis complication will undergo a joint fluid aspiration

Group Type OTHER

joint puncture

Intervention Type OTHER

Patients reporting complications such as pain hindering mobility or affecting quality of life, or any other symptoms suspecting prosthesis failure or infection will undergo joint fluid aspiration.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

joint puncture

Patients reporting complications such as pain hindering mobility or affecting quality of life, or any other symptoms suspecting prosthesis failure or infection will undergo joint fluid aspiration.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient consent to participate in the study.
* Patient aged over 18 years
* Patient with hip, knee or shoulder joint prosthesis
* Patient who has the Indication to perform a FJA, whatever the cause of revision (mechanical, septic)
* Over one-month symptoms evolution for patients suspected of infection

Exclusion Criteria

* Acute prosthesis infection with less than one-month symptoms' duration
* Antibiotic therapy between preoperative FJA and intraoperative samples
* Pregnant or breastfeeding woman.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

SMARMOR

Director

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Simon MARMOR, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-Simon

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix saint Simon

Paris, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Younes KERROUMI, MD

Role: CONTACT

+33144643384

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Simon MARMOR, MD

Role: primary

0033144641640

Valérie ZELLER, MD

Role: backup

0033144641780

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2020-A00466-33

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Incidence of Adductor Canal Catheter Dislodgment
NCT05961085 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
Multicentre SMS Study - FR
NCT06640764 RECRUITING