Non-Invasive Ventilation Versus Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assistance (NAVA) for the Treatment of Bronchiolitis

NCT ID: NCT06053684

Last Updated: 2025-09-05

Basic Information

• Recruitment Status: RECRUITING
• Clinical Phase: NA
• Total Enrollment: 130 participants
• Study Classification: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Start Date: 2023-12-18
• Study Completion Date: 2027-03-31

Brief Summary

This project aims to answer whether the use of a Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assistance mode for non-invasive ventilation in pediatric patients with bronchiolitis results in improved comfort and reduced escalations in therapy (including intubation) when compared to using a standard mode of non-invasive ventilation. Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assistance (NAVA) has been shown to result in greater synchrony then the standard mode of non-invasive ventilation. The study team hypothesizes that this improved synchrony can result in important clinical improvements when NAVA is used to treat children with bronchiolitis.

Detailed Description

Bronchiolitis is a common diagnosis in pediatric hospitals and critical care units. Viral infection in younger patients often results in increased work of breathing, hypoxemia, impaired ventilation, and increased secretion burden. In some cases, treatment of severe respiratory failure includes intubation and mechanical ventilation. Current practice for patients with bronchiolitis who require hospital admission is to initially provide non-invasive ventilation to improve the patient's respiratory mechanics. This non-invasive respiratory support can range from simple nasal cannula, to high-flow nasal cannula, to non-invasive positive pressure ventilation.

The high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) provides warm, humidified, oxygen-enriched air. Therapy commonly is prescribed with a prescribed fraction of inhaled oxygen (FiO2) delivered at 1-2 L/kg/min. This helps to improve oxygenation as the high rate of flow can "wash-out" carbon dioxide in the upper airways and thus reduce the volume of dead space ventilation.

Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) essentially provides a similar method of support as invasive ventilation without the use of endotracheal tube. Prescribed airway support is instead delivered non-invasively through a specialized nasal cannula or for larger children an occlusive facemask of appropriate size. The ventilator provides positive-end expiratory pressure (PEEP) with a prescribed delivery rate of a set inspiratory pressure (positive inspiratory pressure, or pressure control). This ventilator support enables the delivery of a set FiO2, helps maintain open airways to reduce atelectasis and allow for improved oxygenation with better V/Q matching, and improves work of breathing. The ventilator analyzes the flow generated by the patient's inspiratory effort and attempts to provide the prescribed positive inspiratory pressure at the time of the patient's own effort.

One of the major drawbacks of non-invasive ventilation for young pediatric patients with bronchiolitis is the difficulty in achieving synchrony between patient effort and ventilator-delivered positive inspiratory pressure. This is secondary to the large air leak given the non-invasive apparatus and the low inspiratory flows generated by this patient population. Thus, the ventilator and patient are often dyssynchronous which may actually increase work of breathing and agitation while impeding on the ventilatory support provided.

Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assistance (NAVA) attempts to mitigate the harms of ventilator/patient dyssynchrony. This modality utilizes a specialized catheter placed into the esophagus, often via a nasogastric route, which has the capability of monitoring the electrical activity of the patient's diaphragm. This catheter can also be utilized to deliver feeds similarly to a basic nasogastric tube. The NAVA catheter monitors both the activation of the patient's diaphragm (indicating patient respiratory effort) and the strength of this activation in, referred to as the electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) and measured in millivolts (µV). Both human and animal studies have positively correlated the peak Edi values with work-of-breathing and demonstrated higher Edi values when respiratory pathology is present . Based on the Edi tracing, the ventilator can then deliver positive inspiratory pressure that is synchronous with both the patient's respiratory effort and proportional to the strength of this effort through a multiplier referred to as the NAVA level on the ventilator. This modality has been shown to improve patient agitation levels, reduce the need for sedating medications, and enhance synchrony in non-invasive ventilation modes.

The current practice model of the investigators entails that patients with bronchiolitis who require more than 1.5 L/kg of HFNC or require non-invasive ventilation, whether via a conventional or NAVA modality, are managed in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). Both modalities for non-invasive ventilation (conventional and NAVA) are used routinely. Patient respiratory status is aggregated into a value known as the Respiratory Severity Score (RSS) which accounts for respiratory rate, dyspnea, retractions, and auscultatory findings adjusted for the age of the patient. The RSS value is a validated assessment tool with good interobserver reliability between Medical Doctors (MDs), Registered Nurses (RNs), and Respiratory Therapists (RTs). It is calculated on a 4-hour basis for all patients with bronchiolitis in the investigator's PICU and helps determine clinical improvement or deterioration and better guide decisions to increase or decrease support.

While multiple physiologic studies demonstrate a reduced work of breathing with invasive NAVA ventilation, the majority of pediatric studies focused on non-invasive NAVA ventilation were designed to determine improvements in patient/ventilator synchronization. The investigators' project aims are two-fold. The study team hypothesizes that Edi levels and RSS scores will positively correlate for patients with bronchiolitis, allowing for another metric to gauge clinical status. The investigators also hypothesizes that the improved synchronization on NAVA-NIV may improve respiratory status as measured by RSS scores and Edi levels, reduce further escalations in respiratory support, shorten the length of non-invasive ventilation required, and reduce intubation rates. This improvement will be more substantial when transitioning from HFNC to NAVA-NIV compared to transitioning to conventional-NIV.

Conditions

Bronchiolitis

Study Design

• Allocation Method: RANDOMIZED
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Primary Study Purpose: TREATMENT
• Blinding Strategy: NONE

Study Groups

Standard Non-Invasive Mechanical Servo Ventilation Arm

This arm will utilize a standard mode of non-invasive ventilation within protocol parameters.

Group Type: ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard Non-Invasive Mechanical Servo Ventilation

Intervention Type: DEVICE

The active comparator arm will utilize a standard non-invasive mode to provide ventilation support

Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assistance (NAVA) Non-Invasive Mechanical Servo Ventilation Arm

This arm with utilize a NAVA mode of non-invasive ventilation within protocol parameters.

Group Type: EXPERIMENTAL

Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assistance (NAVA) Non-Invasive Mechanical Servo Ventilation

Intervention Type: DEVICE

The experimental arm will utilize a NAVA mode to provide non-invasive ventilation support

Interventions

Standard Non-Invasive Mechanical Servo Ventilation

The active comparator arm will utilize a standard non-invasive mode to provide ventilation support

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Neurally-Adjusted Ventilatory Assistance (NAVA) Non-Invasive Mechanical Servo Ventilation

The experimental arm will utilize a NAVA mode to provide non-invasive ventilation support

Intervention Type: DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

• Patients under the age of two years old with a diagnosis of bronchiolitis presenting to the pediatric ICU
• Patient's provider believes there is equipoise between the use of NAVA or conventional non-invasive ventilation for the patient

Exclusion Criteria

• Patients unable to utilize a nasogastric tube
• Patients with a diagnosis of chronic lung disease, cyanotic heart lesions, or congestive heart failure
• Patients with hypotonia
• Patients likely to require imminent intubation: >0.60 Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (FiO2); Carbon Dioxide (CO2) > 60, frequent apneas, clinician determines patient unlikely to tolerate non-invasive modality)
• Patients with hemodynamic instability, defined as the need for vasoactive medication

• Minimum Eligible Age: 0 Years
• Maximum Eligible Age: 2 Years
• Eligible Sex: ALL
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No

Sponsors

Montefiore Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role: lead

Responsible Party

Responsibility Role: SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Jacqueline Weingarten, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Montefiore Medical Center

Locations

Children's Hospital at Montefiore

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status: RECRUITING

Countries

United States

Central Contacts

Jacqueline Weingarten, MD

Role: CONTACT

jweingar@montefiore.edu

2017459825

Monica Koncicki, MD

Role: CONTACT

mkoncicki@montefiore.org

Facility Contacts

Timothy Brandt, MD

Role: primary

718-619-7494

References

Lodeserto FJ, Lettich TM, Rezaie SR. High-flow Nasal Cannula: Mechanisms of Action and Adult and Pediatric Indications. Cureus. 2018 Nov 26;10(11):e3639. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3639.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 30740281 (View on PubMed)

Javouhey E, Barats A, Richard N, Stamm D, Floret D. Non-invasive ventilation as primary ventilatory support for infants with severe bronchiolitis. Intensive Care Med. 2008 Sep;34(9):1608-14. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1150-4. Epub 2008 May 24.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 18500424 (View on PubMed)

Morley SL. Non-invasive ventilation in paediatric critical care. Paediatr Respir Rev. 2016 Sep;20:24-31. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Mar 14.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 27118355 (View on PubMed)

Jones ML, Bai S, Thurman TL, Holt SJ, Heulitt MJ, Courtney SE. Comparison of Work of Breathing Between Noninvasive Ventilation and Neurally Adjusted Ventilatory Assist in a Healthy and a Lung-Injured Piglet Model. Respir Care. 2018 Dec;63(12):1478-1484. doi: 10.4187/respcare.06192. Epub 2018 Sep 25.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 30254048 (View on PubMed)

Pham TM, O'Malley L, Mayfield S, Martin S, Schibler A. The effect of high flow nasal cannula therapy on the work of breathing in infants with bronchiolitis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015 Jul;50(7):713-20. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23060. Epub 2014 May 21.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24846750 (View on PubMed)

Alander M, Peltoniemi O, Pokka T, Kontiokari T. Comparison of pressure-, flow-, and NAVA-triggering in pediatric and neonatal ventilatory care. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2012 Jan;47(1):76-83. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21519. Epub 2011 Aug 9.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 21830318 (View on PubMed)

Kallio M, Peltoniemi O, Anttila E, Pokka T, Kontiokari T. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) in pediatric intensive care--a randomized controlled trial. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015 Jan;50(1):55-62. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22995. Epub 2014 Jan 31.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 24482284 (View on PubMed)

Ducharme-Crevier L, Beck J, Essouri S, Jouvet P, Emeriaud G. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) allows patient-ventilator synchrony during pediatric noninvasive ventilation: a crossover physiological study. Crit Care. 2015 Feb 17;19(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-0770-7.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 25886793 (View on PubMed)

Liu LL, Gallaher MM, Davis RL, Rutter CM, Lewis TC, Marcuse EK. Use of a respiratory clinical score among different providers. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2004 Mar;37(3):243-8. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10425.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 14966818 (View on PubMed)

Duyndam A, Bol BS, Kroon A, Tibboel D, Ista E. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist: assessing the comfort and feasibility of use in neonates and children. Nurs Crit Care. 2013 Mar-Apr;18(2):86-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2012.00541.x. Epub 2012 Nov 22.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23419184 (View on PubMed)

Stein H, Hall R, Davis K, White DB. Electrical activity of the diaphragm (Edi) values and Edi catheter placement in non-ventilated preterm neonates. J Perinatol. 2013 Sep;33(9):707-11. doi: 10.1038/jp.2013.45. Epub 2013 May 2.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23636099 (View on PubMed)

Beck J, Emeriaud G, Liu Y, Sinderby C. Neurally-adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) in children: a systematic review. Minerva Anestesiol. 2016 Aug;82(8):874-83. Epub 2015 Sep 16.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 26375790 (View on PubMed)

Vignaux L, Grazioli S, Piquilloud L, Bochaton N, Karam O, Levy-Jamet Y, Jaecklin T, Tourneux P, Jolliet P, Rimensberger PC. Patient-ventilator asynchrony during noninvasive pressure support ventilation and neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in infants and children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Oct;14(8):e357-64. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182917922.

Reference Type: BACKGROUND

PMID: 23863816 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

2023-14633

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id