Standard Ultrasound Guidance vs. New Needle-steering Device in Subclavian Venous Catheterization
NCT ID: NCT06050902
Last Updated: 2024-04-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
124 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2024-01-16
2025-08-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The hypothesis is that the needle-steering device will result in a better success rate of subclavian venous cannulation, at first puncture, compared with the conventional ultrasound-guided technique.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Axillary Versus Subclavian Vein Strategies for Central Venous Catheterization Under Continuous Ultrasound Guidance
NCT01543360
Comparison of Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catherterization Via the Lower Internal Jugular Vein or the Subclavian Vein
NCT03162757
Ultrasound Guided Peripheral IV Insertion
NCT03841864
Immediate Complications According to Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheters Insertion Site: a Non-inferiority Randomized Clinical Trial
NCT02975622
Ultrasound Guidance Versus Anatomical Landmarks for Subclavian Vein Catheterization
NCT04690296
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
New magnetic devices theoretically allow better visualization of the needle, a higher success rate and a lower complication rate. In this context, the team performed a prospective randomized simulation trial on a phantom ("reduced torso model"), comparing the standard ultrasound guidance technique with an ultrasound-guided technique assisted by a new needle-steering device in subclavian central venous catheterization (study in progress). The results of this study show a statistically significant improvement in subclavian venipuncture (shorter success time, fewer multiple skin punctures, fewer punctures of the posterior wall of the subclavian vein and needle redirection, greater comfort).
These preliminary results argue for a clinical trial of the practical performance of this new device in intensive care unit patients.
The hypothesis is that the needle-steering device will result in a higher success rate of subclavian venous cannulation at first puncture compared with the conventional ultrasound guidance technique.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
OTHER
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard ultrasound guidance for subclavian venipuncture
62 patients undergoing the usual standard ultrasound guidance technique for subclavian venipuncture
No interventions assigned to this group
Subclavian venipuncture using the needle-steering device
62 patients undergoing subclavian venipuncture using the needle-steering device
Subclavian venipuncture for catheter placement using the needle-steering device
1. Navigation software is implemented in an ultrasound machine.
2. A linear ultrasound probe (similar in appearance to a standard ultrasound probe) is used
3. Magnetization of the puncture needle after short introduction of the needle in a dedicated device.
4. Real time needle guidance on the ultrasound screen during the puncture.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Subclavian venipuncture for catheter placement using the needle-steering device
1. Navigation software is implemented in an ultrasound machine.
2. A linear ultrasound probe (similar in appearance to a standard ultrasound probe) is used
3. Magnetization of the puncture needle after short introduction of the needle in a dedicated device.
4. Real time needle guidance on the ultrasound screen during the puncture.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients or representatives must have given free, informed consent and signed the consent form or patient included in an emergency situation
* Patients must be affiliated to/or beneficiary of a health insurance scheme.
* All patients must be adults (≥18 years of age).
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with severe primary or secondary hemostasis disorders (Pq \< 50 G/L or TP \< 30%, or INR \> 2).
* Patients with a PaO2/FiO2 ratio \< 100 mmHg in mechanically ventilated patients (invasive or non-invasive ventilation).
* Patients with a precarious or unstable respiratory status and significant risk of barotrauma
* Patients for whom it is difficult to visualize the subclavian veins bilaterally (left and right) during ultrasound pre-screening
* Patients with a malformation/deformity of the subclavian region (congenital or acquired: history of surgery/cervical trauma)
* Body mass index \< 15 kg/m² ou \> 40 kg/m²
* Local infection at the puncture site
* Thrombosis of the subclavian or axillary vein
* Patients participating in a category 1 defined RIPH involving subclavian central venous line placement.
* Patients under court protection, guardianship or curatorship.
* Pregnant, parturient or breastfeeding women.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
CHU de NIMES
Nîmes, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NIMAO/2021-1/NB-01
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.