Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
200 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-09-29
2027-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. Is risk of psychiatric relapse different among individuals who take antipsychotic medication, other medication, or no medication?
2. Are pregnancy and neonatal health outcomes different among individuals who take antipsychotic medication, other medication, or no medication?
3. Do infant behavior and neurodevelopment differ among babies who were exposed to antipsychotic medication, other medication, or no medication in utero? Participants will
* complete a psychiatric interview and questionnaires while pregnant;
* donate blood from the mother and from the umbilical cord at delivery
* have their babies participate in infant behavior evaluations and an EEG procedure.
Researchers will compare these outcomes among individuals who were treated either with antipsychotic medication, with psychotropic medications of other classes, and with no medication, to see if psychiatric benefits for the mother and health outcomes for mother and child differ among these three types of treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Use of Psychotropic Medications Among Pregnant Women With Bipolar Disorder
NCT02970721
Lithium Therapy: Understanding Mothers, Metabolism and Mood
NCT02490241
Pregnant Women Taking Lamictal for Bipolar Disorder
NCT01996293
Reproductive Function in Women With Bipolar Disorder
NCT05307848
A Pilot Study of Prophylactic Management of Lamotrigine in Pregnant Women
NCT03774641
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
APs cross the placenta and block dopamine (DA) D2 receptors, which are functional in the developing fetus, including influencing the proliferation and differentiation of neural progenitor cells. Increased DA signaling in early development results in increased numbers of inhibitory cortical interneurons and decreased numbers of pyramidal cells, while decreased DA signaling has the reverse effect. Thus, tonic DA blockade in utero could alter the excitatory/inhibitory balance in mature prefrontal cortex, which could affect fear processing, social functioning, and spatial or working memory in the long term. Additionally, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is an established short-term risk of AP in pregnancy, which is associated with both increased body size and impaired cognitive and motor development in offspring.
At present very limited data exist on developmental outcomes associated with antenatal exposure to APs. Infant studies have found some evidence of initial difficulty adapting to life outside the womb as well as early neuromotor problems, but existing studies lack adequate comparison groups, and longitudinal data are lacking. Regarding long-term outcomes, the research group has found sex-specific increases in risk for psychiatric disorders for male, but not female, offspring, in both a register-based dataset and a clinical pilot study. This potential neurodevelopmental vulnerability requires further investigation in a rigorous longitudinal cohort study.
This study aims to investigate efficacy and adverse effects of AP exposure in pregnant women with severe mental illness (SMI). The research team hypothesizes that APs will be efficacious for psychiatric disorders, but will be associated with increased weight gain in mothers, poor neonatal adaptation in neonates, and sex-specific neurodevelopmental changes in infants. The overall goal is to precisely describe the risk/benefit ratio associated with AP treatment in pregnancy, in order to allow pregnant women with SMI to make informed decisions about their care.
Study Aims:
Aim 1: To investigate efficacy and adverse effects of AP treatment for pregnant women.
Aim 1a: Efficacy of AP treatment for pregnant women with SMI. Hypothesis: Women taking either APs or non-AP mood stabilizers will be less likely to relapse with mood or psychotic episodes than those not medicated.
Aim 1b: Adverse pregnancy outcomes with AP treatment for pregnant women. Hypothesis: Women taking APs will have greater weight gain in pregnancy than women taking non-APs or women taking no medication.
Researchers will recruit women in pregnancy with SMI (bipolar or primary psychotic disorder, N=200) in three groups: taking AP, taking other psychotropic medication, and taking no psychotropic medication, via two specialized perinatal psychiatric centers in NYC and the Netherlands. Women will be followed naturalistically and assessed for psychiatric relapse in pregnancy and the postpartum period, as well as complications of pregnancy, including weight gain and gestational diabetes, This will be the first study of AP efficacy in pregnancy.
Aim 2: To describe neonatal adaptation and physical growth in neonates of the mothers either exposed or unexposed to APs during pregnancy. Aim 2a: Neonatal adaptation in neonates either exposed or unexposed to APs during pregnancy. Hypothesis: Neonates of mothers who took APs during pregnancy will evince poorer neonatal adaptation than neonates of mothers who took either non-AP psychotropics or no medication. Aim 2b: Physical growth in neonates either exposed or unexposed to APs during pregnancy. Hypothesis: Neonates of mothers who took APs during pregnancy will have larger body sizes than neonates of mothers who took either non-AP psychotropics or no medication. The research team will examine obstetric and neonatal outcomes of infants of women with SMI, including neonatal adaptation syndrome (NAS), with control for maternal diagnosis and level of functioning. This will be the first controlled study of NAS after antenatal AP exposure.
Aim 3: To describe neurobehavioral development through 6 months in children from Aim 2. Aim 3a: Auditory sensory gating in children exposed to AP antenatally. Hypothesis: All infants prenatally exposed to APs will have reduced inhibitory activity as measured by the P50 component in the EEG. Aim 3b (Exploratory): Neurobehavioral development through 6 months in children exposed to AP antenatally. Hypothesis: Researchers predict increased symptoms of anxiety and internalizing behaviors for males only. Reduced auditory sensory gating will mediate, and sex will moderate, socioemotional outcomes associated with AP exposure. Comprehensive interviews, behavioral observations, and electroencephalography (EEG) obtained in a home visit at 6 months will assess socioemotional, cognitive, and motor development. The research team will investigate whether infant sex moderates any observed effects of AP exposure. This will be the first study of neural activity after antenatal AP exposure.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Antipsychotic medication
Pregnant women with severe mental illness (diagnosis of bipolar disorder, primary psychotic disorder, or any history of psychiatric hospitalization) who are treated with any of the following medications during pregnancy: Quetiapine, olanzapine, risperidone, aripiprazole, ziprasidone, lurasidone, haloperidol, or any other medication in the first- or second-generation antipsychotic class. All orally administered, with dosages titrated to clinical effect by the participant's primary psychiatrist.
Antipsychotics
Antipsychotic medications are widely prescribed for severe mental illness such as affective and non-affective psychosis, mood stabilization, and augmentation of unipolar depression.
Non-antipsychotic medication
Pregnant women with severe mental illness (diagnosis of bipolar disorder, primary psychotic disorder, or any history of psychiatric hospitalization) who are treated with any psychotropic medications during pregnancy other than those listed.
Non-antipsychotic medication
Psychotropic medications are typically prescribed to manage symptoms of anxiety, depression, psychological distress, and/or insomnia.
No medication
Pregnant women with severe mental illness (diagnosis of bipolar disorder, primary psychotic disorder, or any history of psychiatric hospitalization) who are not treated with any psychotropic medications during pregnancy.
No Medication
Non-psychotropic medications
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Antipsychotics
Antipsychotic medications are widely prescribed for severe mental illness such as affective and non-affective psychosis, mood stabilization, and augmentation of unipolar depression.
Non-antipsychotic medication
Psychotropic medications are typically prescribed to manage symptoms of anxiety, depression, psychological distress, and/or insomnia.
No Medication
Non-psychotropic medications
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Severe mental illness, including:
* Psychotic disorder (affective and nonaffective)
* Bipolar disorder
* History of psychiatric hospitalization, regardless of diagnosis
* Able to complete study interviews and measures in English, Dutch, or Spanish
Exclusion Criteria
* Insufficiently high-functioning to provide full informed consent and/or participate in study procedures
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Erasmus Medical Center
OTHER
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)
NIH
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Thalia Robakis
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thalia Robakis, MD, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
New York, New York, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY 23-00239
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.