Revitalization of Traumatized Immature Permanent Teeth

NCT ID: NCT06043453

Last Updated: 2024-07-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

72 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-10-01

Study Completion Date

2030-09-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study aims to assess the hypothesis that revitalization of teeth without (a)symptomatic apical periodontitis have a more favourable outcome in terms of further root development, periapical bone healing, maintaining/regaining pulp sensitivity and survival, than teeth with (a)symptomatic apical periodontitis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

1. Trial objectives

This study aims to investigate the effectiveness of revitalization procedures, in terms of maintaining or restoring periapical health, further root development and regaining of pulp sensitivity, in immature permanent teeth with (group 1) or without (group 2) (a)symptomatic apical periodontitis .
2. Primary endpoints RRA at 1 year post revitalization. 3 Secondary endpoints Maintained or restored periapical health (evaluated within each group separately due to expected baseline inequivalency between groups) 1 year post revitalization.

4 Other endpoints

* RRA 2 and 3 years post revitalization
* Maintained or restored periapical health 2 and 3 years post revitalization (evaluated within each group separately)
* Pulp sensitivity 1-3 years post revitalization (evaluated within each group separately due to expected baseline inequivalency between groups)
* Tooth survival 3 years post revitalization (even if no further root development and incomplete periapical bone healing with no clinical symptoms).

5 Trial Design Open, prospective cohort, multicenter Blinded: radiographic assessment and statistical analysis; operators and patients cannot be blinded, due to practically not feasible.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Apical Periodontitis Trauma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

with AP

revitalization

Intervention Type OTHER

The main idea behind revitalization is to firstly disinfect the root canal and subsequently attract or transplant mesenchymal stem cells from the (remaining) dental pulp and apical papilla (in case of immature permanent teeth) into the root canal. More specifically, this therapy is not based on mechanical and (aggressive) chemical debridement as in conventional root canal treatment but is supported by the pillars of tissue engineering: stem cells, growth factors and a scaffold .

without AP

revitalization

Intervention Type OTHER

The main idea behind revitalization is to firstly disinfect the root canal and subsequently attract or transplant mesenchymal stem cells from the (remaining) dental pulp and apical papilla (in case of immature permanent teeth) into the root canal. More specifically, this therapy is not based on mechanical and (aggressive) chemical debridement as in conventional root canal treatment but is supported by the pillars of tissue engineering: stem cells, growth factors and a scaffold .

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

revitalization

The main idea behind revitalization is to firstly disinfect the root canal and subsequently attract or transplant mesenchymal stem cells from the (remaining) dental pulp and apical papilla (in case of immature permanent teeth) into the root canal. More specifically, this therapy is not based on mechanical and (aggressive) chemical debridement as in conventional root canal treatment but is supported by the pillars of tissue engineering: stem cells, growth factors and a scaffold .

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Provision of Informed Consent
* Female and male patients
* Age range: 6-18 years
* "Healthy": ASA I and II
* Permanent immature tooth (Cvek stage of root maturation ≤ 2) requiring revitalization
* Etiological factor: (a)symptomatic apical periodontitis post dental trauma or irreversible pulpitis post dental trauma

Exclusion Criteria

* Unlikely to be able to comply with the study procedures, as judged by the investigator
* Patients older than 18 years and younger than 6
* Deciduous teeth
* Cvek root maturation stage \> 2: permanent immature tooth that can be treated by conventional root canal treatment or apexification
* Known or suspected current malignancy
* History of chemotherapy within 5 years prior to study
* History of radiation in the head and neck region
* History of other metabolic bone diseases
* Bleeding disorders
* Involvement in the planning and conduct of the study
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Ghent

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Erlangen-Nürnberg

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Regensburg

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Coimbra

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ghent University

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Nastaran Meschi, MSc, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+32476313889

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Nastaran Meschi, MSc, PhD

Role: primary

+32476313889

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

S67181

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.