Caregiver Skills Training: Comparing Clinician Training Methods

NCT ID: NCT06038799

Last Updated: 2025-04-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

22 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-09-15

Study Completion Date

2024-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Caregiver Skills Training (CST) is an evidence-based intervention for parents of young children with developmental disabilities that was developed through a collaboration between Autism Speaks and the World Health Organization. The intervention is typically offered by Facilitators who are trained and supervised by CST Master Trainers. This study seeks to use a remote training model to compare two training and supervision processes. One group, comprised of facilitators from rural settings, will be trained and supervised by two master trainers from the University of Pittsburgh using a remote training model. A second group, comprised of facilitators from an agency serving primarily low-income households and located near Pittsburgh, will be trained and supervised in a face-to-face manner. Both groups will initially receive ten 90-minute training sessions over a 2-month period and will subsequently receive 1 hour per week of supervision while conducting their first 12-session CST group. Outcome measures will include assessment of change in caregiver stress and didactic skills as well as improvement in each child's communication/social skills, functional skills, and overall behavior. Also added was an additional research question in which face-to-face CST sessions with remote CST sessions were compared.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

There are two aspects to this study: First, the investigators will compare two training and supervision processes. One group, comprised of facilitators from rural settings, will be trained and supervised by two master trainers from the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Center for Autism and Developmental Disorders (CADD). A second group, comprised of facilitators from an agency serving primarily low-income households and located near Pittsburgh, PA, will be trained and supervised in a face-to-face manner. Both groups will receive 15 hours of training spread over the course of 2-3 months (in summer 2023). The focus of these sessions will be to introduce and train staff on the CST model, ensure their understanding of the curriculum, and to help them gain proficiency in administration. During the training phase, both groups will practice administration of activities and will be provided feedback. The master trainers will also assist the newly trained facilitators in navigating recruitment and organization of their first CST groups. Upon initiation of the CST groups, facilitators will receive 1 hour of supervision per week, either in person or via TEAMS. Supervision will extend over the 9 group sessions and 3 home visits per family (fall 2023). These supervision sessions will allow the facilitators to ask questions, obtain feedback, and troubleshoot any challenges. The investigators will also collect pre and post measures (baseline and week 12) from the parents participating in the CST groups to determine if the type of training provided to the facilitators (face-to-face versus remote) impacted parent progress. We have also added an additional research question in which we compare face-to-face CST sessions with remote CST sessions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Parenting

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The investigators will be comparing two types of training/supervision models. One will be provided remotely and one will be provided face-to-face. In addition, investigators will compare two types of treatment: face-to-face sessions versus remote sessions.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Caregivers
Parents that receive Caregiver Skills Training will be unaware of whether their group leaders were trained/supervised remotely or face-to-face.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Remote staff training

Staff will receive 15 hours of remote training followed by 12 weeks of remote supervision (one hour per week).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Caregiver Skills Training (CST)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The investigators are comparing the relative efficacy of CST between a CST group led by clinicians trained and supervised remotely versus a group led by clinicians trained an supervised face-to-face.

Face to face staff training

Staff will receive 15 hours of face to face training followed by 12 weeks of face to face supervision (one hour per week).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Caregiver Skills Training (CST)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The investigators are comparing the relative efficacy of CST between a CST group led by clinicians trained and supervised remotely versus a group led by clinicians trained an supervised face-to-face.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Caregiver Skills Training (CST)

The investigators are comparing the relative efficacy of CST between a CST group led by clinicians trained and supervised remotely versus a group led by clinicians trained an supervised face-to-face.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Parents who

* Have a child ages 2-9 with a developmental disability and/or autism
* Able to be served by one of the three UPMC sites
* Able to attend 12 sessions. Group sessions are at the clinic site and the individual sessions may be done virtually or in person.

Exclusion Criteria

* Parent()s does not speak / understand English. Given the nature of this study, we are unable to provide translation services.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Autism Speaks

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Pittsburgh

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Benjamin L Handen, PhD, BCBA-D

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Benjamin Handen, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Pittsburgh

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UPMC Altoona

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

UPMC Mon Yough

McKeesport, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Ludwig NN, Suskauer SJ, Rodgin S, Chen J, Borda A, Jones K, Lahey S, Slomine BS. Outcome Measurement in Children With a History of Disorders of Consciousness After Severe Brain Injury: Telephone Administration of the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Third Edition, and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended Pediatric Revision. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2023 Feb 1;24(2):e76-e83. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003121. Epub 2022 Dec 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 36661427 (View on PubMed)

Holly LE, Fenley AR, Kritikos TK, Merson RA, Abidin RR, Langer DA. Evidence-Base Update for Parenting Stress Measures in Clinical Samples. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019 Sep-Oct;48(5):685-705. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2019.1639515. Epub 2019 Aug 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 31393178 (View on PubMed)

Wainer AL, Berger NI, Ingersoll BR. Brief Report: The Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the Social Communication Checklist. J Autism Dev Disord. 2017 Apr;47(4):1231-1238. doi: 10.1007/s10803-016-3026-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28105548 (View on PubMed)

Sengupta K, Shah H, Ghosh S, Sanghvi D, Mahadik S, Dani A, Deshmukh O, Pacione L, Dixon P, Salomone E; WHO-CST team; Servili C. World Health Organisation-Caregiver Skills Training (WHO-CST) Program: Feasibility of Delivery by Non-Specialist Providers in Real-world Urban Settings in India. J Autism Dev Disord. 2023 Apr;53(4):1444-1461. doi: 10.1007/s10803-021-05367-0. Epub 2021 Dec 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 34853959 (View on PubMed)

Kasari C, Lawton K, Shih W, Barker TV, Landa R, Lord C, Orlich F, King B, Wetherby A, Senturk D. Caregiver-mediated intervention for low-resourced preschoolers with autism: an RCT. Pediatrics. 2014 Jul;134(1):e72-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-3229.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24958585 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

STUDY23040076

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Caregiver Implementation Strategies Field Pre-Test
NCT06770036 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA