Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
76 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-09-12
2024-11-14
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
* On Day 1, participants will complete a baseline measure assessing their biochemical, physiological, emotional, and behavioral responses to a stressful lethal force decision making task.
* In the next four to six weeks, participants will complete 20 CES sessions.
* Within five days of completing the 20 CES sessions, participants will complete a follow-up measure assessing their biochemical, physiological, emotional, and behavioral responses to the same stressful lethal force decision making task they completed on Day 1.
Researchers will compare the Active CES group to the Sham CES group to see how 20 sessions of Active CES will affect the participants responses to their biochemical, physiological, emotional and behavioral responses relative to the Sham CES group.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) for Soldiers With Combat-Related Symptoms
NCT00866411
Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation: Piloting a Road to PTSD Prevention in First Responders
NCT06203717
Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES) Therapy
NCT02453347
Novel Mental Health Therapies to Improve Military Readiness
NCT05887713
Acupressure and Stress Resilience
NCT01614444
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
BASIC_SCIENCE
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Active CES
Active Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES)
Active CES
Active CES group will receive a minimum of 250µA and up to 500µA depending on thresholding, once daily for 20 days (over the course of 4\~6 weeks), 20 minutes per day.
Sham CES
Sham Cranial Electrotherapy Stimulation (CES)
Sham CES
Sham CES group will be identical to Active CES group with the exception of the device not administering any electrical current
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Active CES
Active CES group will receive a minimum of 250µA and up to 500µA depending on thresholding, once daily for 20 days (over the course of 4\~6 weeks), 20 minutes per day.
Sham CES
Sham CES group will be identical to Active CES group with the exception of the device not administering any electrical current
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Can sit and stand freely.
* Have not used or experienced CES administration in the past.
* Agree to have their data stored in a repository (database) for future use.
Exclusion Criteria
* Women only:
1. Pregnant or plan to become pregnant during the study
2. Nursing
* History of:
1. A neurological or psychological disorder (such as depression, anxiety disorders, migraines, cluster headaches, seizures, Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or panic attacks).
2. Cardiac disease (including arrhythmia or fast or skipped heart beats).
3. Implanted medical devices, such as pacemakers.
4. Hypertension.
5. Insomnia
6. Head injury (including neurosurgery, concussion, TBI, skull fracture, hematoma)
7. Illness that caused brain injury
8. Any other brain-related condition (such as traumatic brain injury)
9. Metal in the head (outside of mouth, such as shrapnel, surgical clips, or fragments from welding or metalwork)
10. Implanted medical device (e.g., pacemaker, insulin pump)
18 Years
40 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
United States Department of Defense
FED
Tufts University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kana Okano, Ph.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Tufts University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tufts University
Medford, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Okano K, Lee MM, Hart-Pomerantz H, Smith M, Sandone MK, Harvey T, Brunye TT. Effects of repeated cranial electrotherapy stimulation on physiological and behavioral responses to acute stress: a double-blind randomized clinical trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2025 Aug 13;19:1641801. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2025.1641801. eCollection 2025.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
STUDY00003572
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.