Boneview-ED - Impact of Artificial Intelligence Detecting Fractures in the Emergence Department : a Pragmatic Prospective Study

NCT ID: NCT06013852

Last Updated: 2024-08-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

1600 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-22

Study Completion Date

2025-01-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Traumatic emergencies are the primary reason for consultation in emergency departments and standard radiography is the primary imaging exam for osteoarticular trauma. However, with the increase in the number of patients admitted to emergency departments and thus the increased workload for emergency room attendants, Interpretation of radiographs in trauma emergencies is made more difficult, resulting in a high risk of misinterpretation.

The growing presence of artificial intelligence in the medical field, notably through the involvement of diagnostic software on imageries, makes its use more relevant in the aid of the replay of osteoarticular imageries.

A recent meta-analysis of 32 studies evaluating the performance of artificial intelligence in fracture detection found comparable performance between experienced radiologists and AI-based diagnosis. However, these were mainly retrospective studies, and thus more distant from the reality of its use in a care stream such as emergencies.

The objective of this study is therefore to prospectively validate the use of artificial intelligence software during its implementation in an emergency department for patients admitted for a suspicion of osteoarticular trauma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

After completing the X-ray requested, the senior emergency physician reads the X-ray (native image only), gives his diagnosis (fracture yes/ no and localization) and reports if he requests the specialist (orthopedist/ radiologist) or not and the reason why he asks for it (urgent management, doubt about a fracture). After processing the radiography with the "Boneview" software, the emergency physician makes a second reading taking into account the analysis of artificial intelligence. It indicates its result and its decision in the same way. Then, he performs the practical management of the patient: specialized call, exit, urgent management.

During the systematic rereading of the radiographs made in the emergency department the night before and night by the radiology intern, he makes a first reading of the native images and gives the result (fracture yes/ no and localization). Then, he makes a second reading assisted by "Boneview" and gives the result again.

A radiologist specialized in osteoarticular imaging will read the radiographs initially native. He will note the result (fracture yes/ no and localization) then read the radiographs annotated by the software. He will give the result again.

For the patient, there will be no additional imaging exams, but the x-ray will be read a secondary time with artificial intelligence assistance. This pet reading causes a change in patient management.

Indeed if a discrepancy is noted between the reading of the radiography by the internal radiology or the conclusion of the emergency physician and the reading of the senior radiologist specialized in osteoarticular imaging, the patient will be recalled and reconvoked to the emergency department if necessary

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Fractures, Bone

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Unique arm

Without and with Boneview software use for all included patients

Group Type OTHER

processing the radiography with the "Boneview" software

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

all X-Rays will be analysed with and without the software

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

processing the radiography with the "Boneview" software

all X-Rays will be analysed with and without the software

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Major patient
* Admitted to the emergency department after trauma less than 48 hours
* Patient with an indication on an x-ray of the limbs or/and pelvis
* Express patient consent
* Affiliated patient or social security beneficiary

Exclusion Criteria

* Polytraumatized patient
* X-ray of the corso-lumbar spine, skull, cervical spine (all parts of the body not affected by the intended use of the software)
* Pregnant, lactating or parturient patient
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Angers

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Damien Combes, Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University hospital of Angers

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dr Damien COMBES

Angers, Maine Et Loire, France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Damien Combes, Dr

Role: CONTACT

(0)2 41 35 42 81 ext. 33

Marie Bost

Role: CONTACT

(0)2 41 35 31 99 ext. 33

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Delphine DOUILLET, Dr

Role: primary

(0)2 41 35 37 15 ext. 33

Christophe AUBE, Pr

Role: backup

(0)2 41 35 42 81 ext. 33

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

49RC23_0343

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

AI PREDICTION FOR PROXIMAL HUMERAL FRACTURES
NCT06467006 NOT_YET_RECRUITING