Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
NA
150 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-01-01
2026-06-26
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Pacing characteristics of a conventional bipolar, active fixation pacing lead for left bundle branch area pacing in patients with symptomatic bradycardia
Study Objectives:
To characterize an approach for left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in patients with bradycardia indications for pacing and to assess implant success rate, safety, and long-term stability with a conventional bipolar, active fixation pacing lead.
Methodology: Open-label, prospective, multi-center, non-randomized, single-arm study
Study Endpoints:
Primary Endpoint:
• Implant success rate
Secondary Endpoints:
* Intra-operative procedure time and fluoroscopic exposure time
* Intra-operative intracardiac electrogram (EGM) changes: paced QRS duration, stimulus to left ventricular (LV) activation time, and LBB potential
* Post-operative imaging data: posteroanterior, left anterior oblique 30O, right anterior oblique 30O, Left lateral views
* Serial paced 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and intracardiac EGM changes: QRS duration (QRSd), pacing-QRS interval, and new atrial fibrillation (AF)
* Serial echocardiography changes: left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), left atrial (LA) and LV chamber size, and global longitudinal strain (GLS) of tissue Doppler imaging
* Serial changes of pacing parameters: capture threshold, impedance, and sensing amplitude for both atrial and ventricular Solia S leads
* Safety:
Immediate (\< 24 hours), in-hospital, and chronic (12 months) adverse events
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
BIOTRONIK Conduction System Pacing With the Solia Lead
NCT05251363
BIOTRONIK Conduction System Pacing With the Solia Lead - Solia CSP S
NCT06540079
BIO|MASTER.CSP Study
NCT06620237
A Prospective Pilot Study (BIO|SELECT Pilot)
NCT03337763
BIO|CONCEPT.Amvia Study
NCT05610176
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Treatment Plan:This is a prospective, single-arm, open-label, non-randomized, multi-center study to investigate the feasibility and stability of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) for ventricular pacing in symptomatic bradycardia patients with a conventional bipolar, active fixation pacing lead. Eligible patients will be enrolled through the process of informed consent in the seven clinical investigational sites across Taiwan with competitive enrollment.
All subjects enrolled in the study will undergo LBBAP implantation using one or two Solia S leads in combination with any legally marketed BIOTRONIK pacemaker system delivered through a preshaped sheath (Selectra 3D) via left cephalic, left subclavian, or left axillary venous access. The available lengths of Solia S are 45, 53, and 60 cm. As for which one will be used, it will depend on the lead configuration and the anatomy of the subject. During the screening period, the subject's medical history and demographic information will be collected. The baseline data will be obtained prior to the pacing implantation. Depending on the needs of the subject, the screening and implantation procedures may be performed on the same day. Implant data will include lead measurements, implant technique, and lead positioning. After completion of pacemaker implantation, subjects will be followed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months or until lead failure (dislodgment, high capture threshold, or inadequate sensing requiring revision of the lead) or death. During follow-up, a determination will be made whether the system is able to provide appropriate pacing and sensing.
Device Description:
Solia Leads: The Solia S is a family of 5.6 French, steroid-eluting, transvenous, endocardial, bipolar active fixation leads with an extendable/retractable and electrically active screw. The Solia S is manufactured, like its predecessor, the Siello S lead, in three different models (45, 53, and 60 cm in length). It has an isodiametric structure and silicone insulation. The inner and outer conductors consist of quadruple wire coils.
Solia S has a diameter of 5.6 F and is covered by a polyurethane overlay for improved gliding. It has an IS-1 connector and a 10 mm pole distance. The area between tip and ring is flexible in order to minimize the perforation risk. The fixation screw of the Solia S is electrically active and has a fractal iridium coating. The screw can be extended by 1.8 mm and has an active surface area of 4.5 mm2. The ring electrode of Solia S has a surface area of approximately 17.4 mm2 and is fractally coated with iridium. The Solia S has a dexamethasone eluting steroid collar containing 0.85 mg dexamethasone acetate. The accessories that are delivered with the lead are identical to the accessories of the Siello S.
Test Device information is below,
* Name: Solia S lead with any BIOTRONIK Pacemaker
* Model: Solia S45/S53/S60
* Manufacturer: BIOTRONIK SE \& Co. KG
* Method of use: LBBAP implantation for all bradycardia indications.
* Mechanism of action: (1) Pacemaker stimulates the cardiac tissue to keep stable heart beats in patients with bradycardia. (2) LBBAP can be an alternative to right ventricular (RV) pacing to reduce RV pacing-induced ventricular dyssynchrony.
* Device category and grade: E3610 Cardiovascular devices, Class III
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Solia S lead with any BIOTRONIK Pacemaker
* Name: Solia S lead with any BIOTRONIK Pacemaker
* Model: Solia S45/S53/S60
* Manufacturer: BIOTRONIK SE \& Co. KG
* Method of use: LBBAP implantation for all bradycardia indications.
* Mechanism of action: (1) Pacemaker stimulates the cardiac tissue to keep stable heart beats in patients with bradycardia. (2) LBBAP can be an alternative to right ventricular (RV) pacing to reduce RV pacing-induced ventricular dyssynchrony.
* Device category and grade: E3610 Cardiovascular devices, Class III
Solia S lead with any BIOTRONIK Pacemaker
* Name: Solia S lead with any BIOTRONIK Pacemaker
* Model: Solia S45/S53/S60
* Manufacturer: BIOTRONIK SE \& Co. KG
* Method of use: LBBAP implantation for all bradycardia indications.
* Mechanism of action: (1) Pacemaker stimulates the cardiac tissue to keep stable heart beats in patients with bradycardia. (2) LBBAP can be an alternative to right ventricular (RV) pacing to reduce RV pacing-induced ventricular dyssynchrony.
* Device category and grade: E3610 Cardiovascular devices, Class III
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Solia S lead with any BIOTRONIK Pacemaker
* Name: Solia S lead with any BIOTRONIK Pacemaker
* Model: Solia S45/S53/S60
* Manufacturer: BIOTRONIK SE \& Co. KG
* Method of use: LBBAP implantation for all bradycardia indications.
* Mechanism of action: (1) Pacemaker stimulates the cardiac tissue to keep stable heart beats in patients with bradycardia. (2) LBBAP can be an alternative to right ventricular (RV) pacing to reduce RV pacing-induced ventricular dyssynchrony.
* Device category and grade: E3610 Cardiovascular devices, Class III
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Standard bradycardia pacing indications requiring new ventricular lead implantation
* Able to give informed consent for the participation in the trial
Exclusion Criteria
* New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class IV heart failure
* Life expectancy \< 1 year
* Right-sided approach for lead implantation
* Hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis patients
* Pregnant or breast-feeding women
* Abnormal baseline findings considered by the investigator to indicate conditions that might affect study endpoints
* Participation in another prospective interventional clinical study within a period of 4 weeks prior to the implantation of LBBAP
* Use of any recreational drugs or history of drug addiction
* Any other condition that, in the investigator's judgment, might increase the risk to the patients or decrease the chance of obtaining satisfactory data needed to achieve the objectives of the study
20 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Biotronik SE & Co. KG
INDUSTRY
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Chun Chieh Wang
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Linkou District, Taipei, Taiwan
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, , Taiwan
China Medical University Hospital
Taichung, , Taiwan
MacKay Memorial Hospital
Taipei, , Taiwan
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Hospital
Yilan, , Taiwan
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
202200877A3
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.