Mechanisms of Action on Rectal Motricity of Intrarectal Botulinum Toxin Injections
NCT ID: NCT05998187
Last Updated: 2023-08-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
PHASE3
21 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2023-12-01
2027-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Multi-centre, Phase II, Double-blind, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group, Dose-ranging Study in Patients With Faecal Incontinence; to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Locally Applied NRL001 Over an 8 Week Treatment Period
NCT01656720
Effect of Single Doses of 10 mg NRL001 Applied as a Suppository to the Anal Canal or Rectum
NCT00893607
Phase 2 Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of RM-131 Administered to Patients With Chronic Constipation
NCT01781104
Study to Investigate Safety and Response to 1 or 2 g Rectal Suppositories Containing 5 or 10 mg NRL001.
NCT00857467
Defecation Patterns in Constipated Patients
NCT04903470
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigator's team has therefore developed another therapeutic option, intra-rectal injections of botulinum toxin, in patients suffering from active fecal incontinence (i.e., preceded by defecatory urgency). The investigator have conducted two pilot studies, which demonstrated the efficacy of this treatment in an open-label setting, and the investigator are currently completing a randomized, double-blind, controlled study to confirm its efficacy (PHRCN 2014-003650-14). Nevertheless, the mechanisms of action of intra-rectal botulinum toxin injections remain hypothetical. By analogy with the intra-detrusor injections used for over 20 years to treat overactive bladder disease, it is possible that the toxin plays an inhibitory role on rectal motricity. Botulinum toxin inhibits the release of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction. Without this release, smooth muscle contraction cannot take place. In one of the two pilot, intra-rectal injections of botulinum toxin were performed in 6 patients with fecal incontinence and hyperactivity of the rectum or colonic reservoir after resection. In addition to the clinically demonstrated effect of these injections, there was a significant reduction in the amplitude of rectal contractions after injection. However, there was no correlation between the observed motor effect of botulinum toxin and the efficacy of the injections. Moreover, some patients did not exhibit colonic or rectal hypermotricity and still benefited from the injections. The investigator would like to continue exploring the motor effect of intra-rectal toxin injections on a larger group of patients suffering from faecal incontinence, using a more powerful motor recording system than anorectal manometry.
For this work, we hypothesize that intra-rectal botulinum toxin injections act primarily via a motor effect by inhibiting propagated rectal contractions. To test this hypothesis, a high-resolution recto-sigmoid manometry probe will be used to evaluate rectal and sigmoidal motricity spontaneously and in response to stimulant laxative injection, before and after intra-rectal injection of botulinum toxin. Patients included will be those suffering from faecal incontinence who have failed conservative treatments and are candidates for intra-rectal injections of botulinum toxin.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
intra-rectal botulinum toxin injections
Patients with fecal incontinence who have failed conservative treatments and are candidates for intra-rectal botulinum toxin injections.
intra-rectal botulinum toxin injections
Patients with fecal incontinence who have failed conservative treatments and are candidates for intra-rectal botulinum toxin injections.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
intra-rectal botulinum toxin injections
Patients with fecal incontinence who have failed conservative treatments and are candidates for intra-rectal botulinum toxin injections.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Impairment of quality of life at investigator's discretion
* Patients at least 18 years of age
* Patients who have read and understood the information letter and signed the consent form
* Patients affiliated to the French Social Security system
* Women of childbearing age using effective contraception (Cf. CTFG) (estro- progestins or intrauterine device or tubal ligation) for at least 1 month and a negative B-HCG urine pregnancy test at inclusion and for the duration of the study.
* Postmenopausal women: confirmatory diagnosis (non-medically induced amenorrhea for at least 12 months prior to inclusion visit)
Exclusion Criteria
* Pregnant women, women in labor, breastfeeding women, or women without proven contraception
* Patient deprived of liberty by administrative or judicial decision, or protected adult (under guardianship or trusteeship)
* Exclusive passive fecal incontinence
* Patient suffering from constipation (Rome IV criteria)
* Patient with an evolving inflammatory or cancerous digestive pathology
* Previous rectal surgery
* Person participating in another research protocol or having participated in another research protocol in the 4 weeks preceding the inclusion visit
Linked to botulinum toxin injections
* Hypersensitivity to botulinum toxin or to one of the excipients (human albumin, sodium chloride)
* Neuromuscular junction pathology (myasthenia, Lambert-Eaton syndrome, etc.)
* Presence of infection at injection site(s)
* General anesthesia less than one month ago
* Association with aminoglycosides and anti-cholinesterase agents (risk of increased toxin effects)
* History of neurogenic damage such as polyradiculoneuritis
* History of dysphagia with esophageal or neurological stasis, swallowing disorders, inhalation pneumonitis
* Botulinum toxin injections in the 3 months preceding the study
* Clinical anal examination suggestive of anorectal abscess
* Recent history (\<12 months) of myocardial infarction and/or rhythm disorders not reduced by appropriate treatment
* Peripheral motor neuropathies (such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or motor neuropathy) and underlying neurological disorders
* Current treatment with anticoagulants or anti-aggregants or haemostasis disorders according to recommendations (SFED). When patients are on anticoagulant or anti-aggregant therapy, the type of injections to be performed depends on the type of anticoagulation and the patient's thrombo-embolic risk:
* Patients on anticoagulant or anti-aggregant therapy with a major thrombo-embolic risk will not be included.
* Patients on anticoagulant or anti-aggregant therapy with a moderate or low thrombo-embolic risk may be included. If patients are taking a vitamin K antagonist, treatment will be continued provided that the INR is within the usual range of 2 to 3 (GETED, HAS, 2008). If patients are taking anti-aggregants, these can be continued (SFED, HAS, 2012). If patients are taking new oral anticoagulants, they should take a short break and not take the AOD the evening before or the morning of the injections (GIHP, 2015).
Linked to rectosigmoidoscopy
* Local pathology preventing colonoscopy (anal stenosis)
* Allergy or hypersensitivity to silicone and/or latex
Linked to laxatives
* Contraindication to DULCOLAX® 5 mg, gastro-resistant coated tablet
* Contraindication to XIMEPEG®, powder for oral solution
Linked to high-resolution manometry
* Clinically diagnosed intestinal obstruction
* Severe coagulopathy or oral anticoagulants
* Cardiac disorders for which vagal stimulation is poorly tolerated
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Rouen
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Charlotte DESPREZ
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Rouen
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Univesity Hospital, Rouen
Rouen, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rao SS, Bharucha AE, Chiarioni G, Felt-Bersma R, Knowles C, Malcolm A, Wald A. Functional Anorectal Disorders. Gastroenterology. 2016 Mar 25:S0016-5085(16)00175-X 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.009. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.009. Online ahead of print.
Xu X, Menees SB, Zochowski MK, Fenner DE. Economic cost of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 May;55(5):586-98. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823dfd6d.
Desprez C, Damon H, Meurette G, Mege D, Faucheron JL, Brochard C, Lambrescak E, Gourcerol G, Mion F, Wyart V, Sielezneff I, Siproudhis L, Etienney I, Ajamie N, Lehur PA, Duflot T, Bridoux V, Leroi AM; Club NEMO. Ten-year Evaluation of a Large Retrospective Cohort Treated by Sacral Nerve Modulation for Fecal Incontinence: Results of a French Multicenter Study. Ann Surg. 2022 Apr 1;275(4):735-742. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004251.
Bridoux V, Gourcerol G, Kianifard B, Touchais JY, Ducrotte P, Leroi AM, Michot F, Tuech JJ. Botulinum A toxin as a treatment for overactive rectum with associated faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis. 2012 Mar;14(3):342-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02585.x.
Gourcerol G, Benard C, Melchior C, Touchais JY, Ducrotte P, Menard JF, Bridoux V, Leroi AM. Botulinum toxin: an endoscopic approach for treating fecal incontinence. Endoscopy. 2016 May;48(5):484-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1393242. Epub 2015 Oct 8.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2021/0384/HP
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.