Efficacy and Safety Study of Prucalopride for the Re-Treatment of Chronic Constipation

NCT ID: NCT00598338

Last Updated: 2008-05-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

516 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

1999-04-30

Study Completion Date

2000-02-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether prucalopride is safe and effective in the re-treatment of chronic constipation.

Hypothesis:

Retreatment is as effective and safe as treatment with prucalopride in patients with chronic constipation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a multicentre, Phase III trial with a parallel-group design, consisting of a 2 week drug-free run-in period, followed by a 4-week double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment period, a drug-free washout period of at least 2 weeks, and a second 4-week double-blind treatment period.

During the initial run-in period, the subject's bowel habit will be documented in a daily diary and the existence of constipation will be confirmed. Eligible subjects will be randomly allocated to double-blind treatment with either 4 mg prucalopride or placebo, given orally once daily before breakfast, for 4 weeks.

After 4 weeks of treatment, each subject will enter a drug-free washout period. The length of the washout period will be either 2 or 4 weeks, depending on how long it takes for the subject to meet the criteria for constipation. If the subject is unable to re-qualify after a 4-week washout, the subject must be discontinued from the trial.

Subjects who qualify for the second double-blind treatment period will receive the same treatment as during the first treatment period, once-daily for an additional four weeks.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Constipation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

1

Prucalopride

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Prucalopride

Intervention Type DRUG

4 mg o.d.

2

Placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type OTHER

o.d.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Prucalopride

4 mg o.d.

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

o.d.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Resolor

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Male and non-pregnant, non-breast-feeding female outpatients at least 18 years of age (no upper age limit).
2. History of constipation; the patient reported having, on average, 2 or fewer spontaneous bowel movements per week that resulted in a feeling of complete evacuation as well as the occurrence of one or more of the following for at least 6 months before the selection visit:

* very hard (little balls) and/or hard stools at least a quarter of the stools;
* sensation of incomplete evacuation following at least a quarter of the stools;
* straining at defecation at least a quarter of the time. The above criteria were only applicable for spontaneous bowel movements, i.e. not preceded within a period of 24 hours by the intake of a laxative agent or by the use of an enema.

Patients who never had spontaneous bowel movements were considered to be constipated and were eligible for the study.

Exclusion Criteria

4. Willing and able to fill out his/her own diary and questionnaires without help, and able to read and write English.
5. Written informed consent, signed by the patient or legally acceptable representative and by the investigator.
6. Availability for follow-up during the study period as determined in the protocol.


1. Patients in whom constipation was thought to be drug-induced, or who were using any disallowed medication
2. Patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
3. Patients suffering from endocrine disorders.
4. Patients suffering from neurologic disorders
5. Presence of a megacolon/megarectum or a diagnosis of pseudo-obstruction.
6. Constipation as a result of surgery.
7. Known or suspected organic disorders of the large bowel (i.e. obstruction, carcinoma, or inflammatory bowel disease). Results of a barium enema with flexible sigmoidoscopy or of a colonoscopic examination performed within the last 12 months were needed to rule out organic disorders. A colonoscopic examination or barium enema with flexible sigmoidoscopy performed within the last 3 years was acceptable if the examination was performed for an evaluation of constipation, and there was no history or evidence of weight loss, anaemia, or rectal bleeding, and the patient had 3 consecutively negative stool occult blood tests at screening. Patients with polyps discovered by colonoscopy that were untreated (i.e. by polypectomy) were to be excluded.
8. Presence of known serious, uncontrolled illnesses: clinically significant cardiac, vascular, pulmonary, endocrine, psychiatric disorders (including active alcohol or drug abuse) or metabolic disturbances.
9. Clinically significant cancer within the past 5 years.
10. Subjects known to be HIV positive.
11. Impaired renal function, i.e. serum creatinine concentration \>2 mg/dL (\>180 micromol/L) or creatinine clearance ≤50 mL/min.
12. Clinically significant abnormalities of haematology, urinalysis, or blood chemistry.
13. Females of child-bearing potential without adequate contraceptive protection during the study. Oral contraceptives, Depo Provera® and Norplant® had to be used for at least 3 months prior to randomisation. Intrauterine devices (IUDs), sterilization, or a double barrier method were other acceptable methods of birth control.
14. Treatment with an investigational drug in the 30 days preceding the run-in phase of the study.
15. Previous treatment with either prucalopride formulation.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Movetis

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Movetis

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Miner, Jr. B Miner, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Oklahoma Foundation for Digestive Research

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PRU-USA-28

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id