Producing a Novel Symptom Burden Scale for People Living With Idiopathic Multicentric Castleman Disease (ISBUS)
NCT ID: NCT05995834
Last Updated: 2023-08-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2023-10-31
2024-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Zanuburutinib in Relapsed and Refractory iMCD: a Prospective, Single-center, Single-arm Trial
NCT04743687
Siltuximab In Siltuximab-RElapsed/REfractory Multicentric CAstleman Disease
NCT04838860
A Study of Anti-IL-6R mAb Injection in Patients With iMCD
NCT05345522
Efficacy and Safety of Pozelimab and Cemdisiran Combination Therapy in Patients With Sporadic Inclusion Body Myositis
NCT06479863
An Open Label Study of the Effects and Safety of Zanubrutinib in NMOSDs Adult Patients
NCT05356858
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This international mixed-methods study will be conducted in four stages:
Stage 1: Item generation
* Drawing on the content, data, and analysis from a previous international patient online survey in iMCD with 65 patients, generate draft PROM content (including a longlist of candidate draft items under existing themes) to assess symptom burden in iMCD.
* Incorporate expert opinion and lived experience to achieve consensus on which items will be tested for inclusion in the symptom burden scale via an online multi-stakeholder workshop involving the funder, research team, patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) representative(s) (i.e., patients with iMCD and/or their carers), healthcare professionals, and any other relevant stakeholders.
Stage 2: Item testing and refinement
* Cognitive debriefing interviews with about 10 people living with iMCD to assess the content validity of the items (and associated PROM content) in terms of relevance, comprehensibility, and comprehensiveness. This will include assessing whether they are important/meaningful to patients.
* Analyse and summarise qualitative evidence on content validity, make recommendations on revisions to the draft PROM, and agree this with the multi-stakeholder advisory group (as described above) and a separate group of PPIE collaborators.
Stage 3: Final item selection
* Administer the refined PROM (from Stage 2) to as wide a sample as possible of people living with iMCD. The estimated sample size is 100 patients. The PROM will be administered alongside additional sociodemographic and clinical questions and measures of burden and/or health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
* Taking into account the sample size, conduct appropriate psychometric analyses in order to provide evidence for final item selection and to provide preliminary psychometric evidence on the reliability and validity of the final measure.
* Taking into account all of the available qualitative and quantitative evidence, and a consultation with PPIE collaborators, agree (with the multi-stakeholder advisory group) on final item selection, with the goal of obtaining an 8-10 item measure of symptom burden.
Stage 4: Preliminary measures of change
* Stage 4a: Re-administer the refined PROM (from Stage 2) to participants (from Stage 3) alongside measure(s) of perceived clinical change.
* Stage 4b: Conduct qualitative interviews with about 10 participants who have completed the PROM at both time points to understand what constitutes a meaningful difference from their perspective.
* Triangulate quantitative and qualitative data to estimate a minimally important clinical difference (MCID) for the new PROM, agreed with the multi-stakeholder advisory group.
Recruitment for Stages 2-4 will take place in USA, Canada, Brazil, Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom. Interviews will be conducted online for Stages 2 and 4 and the psychometric survey will be hosted and administered online.
Governance: The results of each stage will be discussed and final decisions will be made with a multi-stakeholder group consisting of the wider research team, clinicians and other healthcare professionals and PPIE.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
OTHER
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Research questions
Stage 1: Secondary analysis of a previous international survey to identify items
Stage 2: Cognitive debriefing interviews with about 10 people living with iMCD to assess the content validity of the items
Stage 3: Completion of questionnaire to finalise scale
Stage 4a: Re-administering of follow-up questionnaire to Stage 3 patients to assess minimally important clinical difference. Test-retest will be calculated only in patients exhibiting no change.
Stage 4b: Qualitative interviews with a subset of participants from Stages and 4 to help with interpretation of meaningful difference from their perspective
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Adults (aged 18+ years)
* Fluent in English
Exclusion Criteria
* Children (aged \< 18 years)
* Not able to understand or communicate in English
* People lacking the capacity to consent
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Sheffield (ScHARR)
UNKNOWN
KMC Health Care
UNKNOWN
Castleman Disease Collaborative Network (CDCN)
UNKNOWN
RECORDATI GROUP
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anju Keetharuth, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Sheffield
Philip Powell, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Sheffield
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
example of registration of PROMs
example of registration of PROMs
example of registration of PROMs
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ISBUS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.