CLIF Correction VS. Conventional Correction Strategy for ASD

NCT ID: NCT05982808

Last Updated: 2023-08-09

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

NOT_YET_RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

420 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2024-07-01

Study Completion Date

2028-06-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The present study intends to: 1)establish a multi-center large-sample randomized controlled trial to explore the technical advantages and surgical indications of the novel surgical technique of CLIF correction for ASD compared with the conventional correction strategy; 2)analyze the postoperative clinical and imaging results, and to explore the related complications and preventive measures; 3) establish 2-year follow-up to further quantify the clinical and radiographical outcomes of CLIF correction.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is the most common spinal deformity in the elder, which often causes the low back pain and/or physical deformity. Severe cases need surgical treatment. Because the conventional posterior approach had the disadvantages of big trauma and slow recovery, and the elder were always complicated with complicated medical diseases, the perioperative risk was high. At present, the novel surgical technique of CLIF correction was a popular way for ASD treatment. Preliminary results showed that it had less trauma, shorter operation time, faster recovery, fewer complications and remarkable clinical and adiographical outcomes. Therefore, the present study intends to: 1) establish a multi-center large-sample randomized controlled trial to explore the technical advantages and surgical indications of the novel CLIF correction for ASD treatment compared with the conventional correction strategy; 2) establish 2-year follow-up to further quantify the clinical and radiographical outcomes, and to explore the related complications and preventive measures;. Therefore, the present project aims to explore the best surgical plan for treating ASD by studying the safety and effectiveness of the novel CLIF correction, and provide new surgical strategies for minimally invasive and Individualized treatment for ASD.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Deformity

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

with/without novel CLIF correction
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Novel CLIF correction

ASD patients with novel CLIF correction

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

CLIF correction

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

CLIF correction was a novel surgical techqiue of correction of spinal deformtiy with minimal invasive approach

conventional correction strategy

ASD patients with conventional correction strategy

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

conventional correction strategy

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

conventional correction was the classic surgical techqiue of correction of spinal deformtiy with open posterior approach

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CLIF correction

CLIF correction was a novel surgical techqiue of correction of spinal deformtiy with minimal invasive approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

conventional correction strategy

conventional correction was the classic surgical techqiue of correction of spinal deformtiy with open posterior approach

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* adult spinal deformtiy;
* 40yrs≤age≤80yrs;
* Lenke-Silva classification II-V grade;
* ineffective with conservative treatment;

Exclusion Criteria

* severe osteoprosis with T value \<-2.5;
* with preliminary spinal surgery;
* ASA score≥III grade;
* more than II degree spondylisthesis;
* with mental disease;
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Wang Zhiwei, MD

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zhi-wei WANG, Ph.D and MD.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

2nd Hospital, Zhejiang University, School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zejiang University

Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Zhi-wei WANG, Ph.D and MD.

Role: CONTACT

0571-88981080 ext. 86

Fang-cai LI, Ph.D and MD.

Role: CONTACT

0571-88981080

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Aebi M. The adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J. 2005 Dec;14(10):925-48. doi: 10.1007/s00586-005-1053-9. Epub 2005 Nov 18.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 16328223 (View on PubMed)

Ailon T, Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Lenke LG, Brodke D, Harrop JS, Fehlings M, Ames CP. Degenerative Spinal Deformity. Neurosurgery. 2015 Oct;77 Suppl 4:S75-91. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000000938.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26378361 (View on PubMed)

Schwab F, Dubey A, Gamez L, El Fegoun AB, Hwang K, Pagala M, Farcy JP. Adult scoliosis: prevalence, SF-36, and nutritional parameters in an elderly volunteer population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 May 1;30(9):1082-5. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000160842.43482.cd.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 15864163 (View on PubMed)

Smith JS, Shaffrey CI, Glassman SD, Berven SH, Schwab FJ, Hamill CL, Horton WC, Ondra SL, Sansur CA, Bridwell KH; Spinal Deformity Study Group. Risk-benefit assessment of surgery for adult scoliosis: an analysis based on patient age. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 May 1;36(10):817-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e21783.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 20683385 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CLIF correction for ASD

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.